That's always the risk you take with cute sexy clothes coming between you and a horny man. Look at lower price tags next time!

looks like your lingerie worked TOO well

Why don't women understand you don't need sexy clothes to turn on a man? Hell, you don't even need clothes at all!

lets be honest there can be sexy ones for $20, but for me $110 is overboard .....guess she really loves him.

Yeah, like love has something to do with the amount of money someone likes to waste...

That being said, my sexy lingerie sets are cheap (H&M + sales = winwin), but I'm still happy my boyfriend doesn't destroy them. Can't imagine how mad/sad I would be if he did. But on the other hand, it shows that he really is into it, and it doesn't sound so nice to become mad/sad on him because of that.

Solution: let him buy you another sexy new lingerie set. See if he's still going to destroy it.

Let's be honest: a ham sandwich will turn us on.

That would depend on where the ham is placed.

#54: if i was that guy and had to buy the new once... I still would have distroyed it next time lol

There should be a 'one time use' tag on things like that.

Target and JCPenney. It's all you need :)

#54 it's not like he is destroying it while you don't have it on. He is seeing that you're doing something to turn him on and is trying to return the favor with great sex.

If it was literally destroyed when he ripped it off, it was probably shit quality anyway! Buy either cheaper lingerie, or better quality.

OP don't complain you still got some

Money well spent.

So true. OP should be happy. They did EXACTLY what they were intended to do ;)

Take it as a compliment. He wanted you so bad he ripped your clothes off!

Sounds like the recipe for a rapist. O.o.

it's just hulk-style.

Hm. I thought when you ripped something completely off of another thing, they would still be intact. Who would've known they'd get destroyed.

Doesn't matter. Had sex.

Under appreciated

That's what you get for buying something that over priced!

Too many negative votes, comment buried. Show the comment

"That's trashy"
Says the person with a "guard your nuts" profile picture.

30- You're one of those assholes that thinks wearing more expensive clothes makes you better than everyone else.

Well, you live and learn, right!? apart from #30...

30 hahaha in this economy? Good luck.

30 was being sarcastic.... Seriously, people.

30- If the woman didn't tell you, you would never know the difference.

30- uhhh... Some people don't have the money to buy $110 lingerie. 3 is right, It's what she gets. Quit being such a douche and love ur lady for her, not her clothes and the price of them.

Ugh, the nerve of some people! Lol ;)

30- How do you know if it's from Walmart or Target? Do you check the tag of a girls underwear before you go out on a date? Honestly a lot of intimate clothes from both stores are just a sexy as Victoria's Secret stuff and a hell of a whole lot cheaper. If you are that shallow you need to be single.

Like the country singer Grechen Wilson said "I don't need no designer clothes to make my man want me."

30 - I don't think you're sleeping with any girls.

Haha that sucks

You probaly shop at Abercrappy & Bitch, 30.

You could've still looked cute for cheaper. He might not have been as excited, but it would save you money. IMO, less is best. If she is in just undies and a T-shirt to get my 'attention', that would get me going.

Even if someone can afford some over priced shit, they could spend the money on something more productive. Plus, you shouldn't judge someone by their clothes.

I got some lingerie from Target for $18 the other day and wore it last night and my husband went nuts. I wouldn't buy it at Walmart simply because the quality isn't good, but Target is way better quality than that. On another note, I do have a few tops from Walmart that actually aren't poor quality. I also have Chanel sunglasses and a Louis Vuitton purse. I grew up spoiled ridiculously rotten and still never bought designer clothes for myself. I shopped (and still do) at Macy's, Old Navy, JCPenney, and Target. My stepmom got me my LV purse for Christmas and I only carry it so I don't hurt her feelings but it's ugly and something I would never buy myself, money or not. Expensive designer price tags don't make things any better than something else. The quality might be better and it'll last you longer, but some of it is as ugly as hell. Is better to save money where you can even if you're rich because one day you might not have all that money and you'll have no idea how to survive without it.

Talk about foreplay

That's a lot of money for lingerie. I'm sure he would have been just fine with you being naked. Plus, it's less work for him.

Not necessarily. I know lingerie gets me going better than if my girl just starts out naked. The slight tease and getting her out of it is all part of the fun.

12- maybe so, but $110?! That's a little much. I think lingerie half that price could still satisfy.

In the end you got want you wanted attention and really good sex so win win!!

Looks like you got ripped off twice.

Fucking love you perdix

YEEEEAHHHH!!!!!!

Lmao, that was so creative. :-)

You're hot

Bu dun tish

next time goto Spencer's and get the edible lingerie ;) cheaper and more fun

Oh yeah that is fun!

Except for the fact that it tastes like plastic asshole.

@124 the one my ex picked out from there was strawberry so idk lol

131 - you're 15, what are you doing eating candy lingerie off of anyone?

touche' lol

It tastes like shit. Me and my best friend tried that out...

i see :3

Haha that's the best!

Haha that's the best!

Haha yummy!

Crap I'm sorry I didn't see me comment get through

205/206/207/208 Haha your an idiot!!

Doesn't matter had sex

Still counts!

a winner?(:

Look into buying an iron suit next time I'd love to see him try to tear that shit apart

Lol

Chastity belt and a flak jacket. :)

Hell for sex any guy would find a way to tear that shit off lol

Aww! #37, I was gunna say that! Great minds think alike, I suppose. Well, in that case, DEFINITELY! :)

What if hes iron man