18/07/2009 20:19 - United States
30/08/2010 18:42 - United States
02/09/2015 20:13 - Germany
15/05/2010 06:21 - United Kingdom
06/10/2016 15:50 - United States - Saint Louis
05/06/2009 07:49 - United States
17/10/2012 20:16 - Canada - Grande Prairie
21/05/2011 15:31 - United States
25/12/2009 08:14 - Canada
06/03/2015 01:38 - United States - Montclair
27/03/2012 17:51 - United States - Phoenix
27/02/2014 22:42 - Sweden - Stockholm
By Anonymous - 14/01/2021 14:01
30/03/2013 05:19 - United States - El Cajon
11/02/2012 01:02 - United States
17/02/2010 19:49 - United States
02/06/2009 12:19 - Israel
23/02/2014 02:27 - France - Paris
03/03/2013 09:29 - United States - Camden
18/09/2015 21:14 - United States - Jonesboro
02/02/2012 18:07 - India
24/11/2014 01:59 - United States - Bar Harbor
22/03/2009 01:41 - United States
04/05/2014 06:12 - United States - Eureka
01/03/2015 23:22 - United States - Houston
21/05/2010 12:07 - United Kingdom
04/03/2010 05:30 - Australia
By katta2009 - 29/08/2010 11:29 - United States
By Anonymous - 29/06/2020 17:00
30/06/2015 06:18 - Belgium - Li?ge
03/02/2012 15:49 - United Kingdom
11/07/2015 03:49 - Australia - Kew
10/08/2009 22:48 - United States
By Abeille - 17/03/2011 00:50 - Canada
28/08/2013 21:29 - Canada - Oshawa
29/05/2012 07:54 - Australia - Melbourne
31/01/2013 12:26 - France - Ostricourt
07/08/2015 15:16 - United States - Elkhart
Add a comment - Reply to : #
Doesn't solve the whole problem. If the ring was stolen, he can not become the owner of it, it still belongs to the person it was stolen from. So .... he lost the money for the ring. If he is very, very lucky the cops might catch the thief before he spend all the money. Of course buying a ring from "some guy" ... sounds like there might be a YDI involved.
I'm confused... if you bought a car from him, how is the ring evidence? Was the ring in the car when you bought it? Or did you buy the ring from this guy too?
yeah but what does his car have to do with it? unless he bought both his car AND the ring from the robber, his statement doesn't match up. i think he meant to say that he bought the ring from the robber, and then the ring was confiscated as evidence, so not only was he arrested, he lost all the money he spent on the ring.
exactly my question. i know the cop would ASSUME that it was an evidence. but wouldnt you have a receipt or some sort of carbon copy of your check or bank account statement to show that you bought the ring yourself? assuming you didnt get it off from the car thief who stole the ring. however, if you did buy it off the car guy, what were you thinking? you should have bought it from a store/some place legit, it'd show sincerity to your proposal, instead of some 2nd hand ring from some random guy who steal cars. with that said, it still sucks that your car seller was a thief. that is still a FYL.
The car was used in a jewellery store robbery - the same store OP bought his ring from. After the robbery, the actual thief sold his car to the OP. When the police recognised the car, they searched him, found the ring that he BOUGHT from the store, and is using that as evidence.
If you have a receipt for the ring you're OK. Sure it sucks being inconvenienced.