By Anonymous - 11/07/2013 14:24 - United States
Same thing different taste
Specially for dad
By anonymous - 01/02/2020 20:00 - United States - Shawnee
Life goals
By ShayisPay101 - 15/02/2010 18:58 - United States
By ppema - 31/07/2015 18:28 - United States
By Anonymous - 17/11/2014 15:47 - United States - Rochester
By Anonymous - 08/05/2016 08:42
Irony failure
By alcoholic - 31/10/2009 14:30 - Estonia
Uptight girl, she's been living in her uptight world…
By TheVirginJenny - 07/10/2012 00:05 - United States - Spanaway
By tamponmayhem - 09/03/2009 19:30 - Canada
By Anonymous - 10/07/2013 16:38 - United States - Spencer
By healthfreak - 07/09/2014 01:57 - United States - Marietta
Top comments
Comments
Well.. ****.
Sometimes I wonder about this generation...
33- exactly, i hate how people always blame crazy shit people do on "this generation" when their generation has done equally stupid stuff.
Oh lord, I'm sorry to tell you, but she is probably going to be pregnant by 16. Unless she uses protection, no not at all...
Being the horny 13 year old boy I am, it was probably me that got her off.
Now now 26, every generation has it's faults. I remember as a kid they'd try you for staring in Salem
Phoebe the Time Traveler?
92, Just cause someone has a boyfriend or girlfriend at that age doesn't mean they're going all the way. In fact, most of them aren't. At least thats how it was 10 or 11 years ago when I was 13 or 14.
Ike
What exáctly does is matter whether you have a boyfriend at the age of 13/14 or not? That's their choice and, at the moment, they're happy. I however do not agree if you already commence in sexual intercourse at that age. You can perfectly have a boyfriend and be happy (probably only though if you're reasonable and don't go psycho, if it breaks up). Live, Laugh, LOVE. :) PS, I'm fourteen, have had one boyfriend (which some people are going to hate me for) and he broke up with me, because he was gay, BUT, I am a perfectly normal student in grammar school (meaning I don't go ditching classes and I practically can't even lie) and can perfectly think for myself, thank you :)
54- well, the Romans thought it was perfectly fine for a girl to get married and have babies by 13. Then again, life expectancy was in the 40's so... The more you know. These tidbits are fascinating.
209, Regardless of the practices you stated, back then in most parts of the world, that was the norm. Physically, a boy's and girl's bodies are capable of childbirth. And, due to the shorter life expectancy as was stated, they had to get married and start a family earlier than what we're used to in order to compensate for it.
209- Hardly the moral authority to be quoting? You must tell that to the Europeans and Americans who still emulate that society. Both Europeans and Americans had slaves. That rape was occurred during plundering is true, and still today we have that action in our marriage rights: the man carrying the woman through the threshold is from the Rape of Lucretia. As for the feeding people to lions, it was two parts effective. Only criminals fought and participated in the gladiatorial events, and it served as public entertainment to make the plebeians happy. Besides, gladiators could fight for their freedom as well. Morally that may seem wrong to just kill off criminals like that, but look at our prison system today where it costs millions to keep prisoners. I was not suggesting that teenage girls go out and get married and have children by 13, I was just stating that indeed the human body is, and has been, capable of such things by 13.
157 you'd be surpriaed by the amount of 13/14 year olds already sexually active...it's sad.
#208 I know this wasn't the point of your post but technically the life expectancy was only 40 because that was an average since a lot of people died in childhood. If you made it past childhood there was a good chance you would make it to your 60s.
stfu, they are not mentally ready or mature enough + what a waste of words^^
Hey no worries, I am also 17 with no romantic experience. It doesn't even bother me the slightest bit because It is by choice. Many guys have showed interest in me but I feel like I am young and don't want to waste my time giving guys a shot when I feel nothing for them. Out of all the guys I have ever met or laid eyes on, only one has ever caught my attention.
@205, of course you're going to defend the people your age. Why do people your age feel the need to be in 'deep' relationships. Frankly, it's quite hilarious for others to watch you edit your profile pics together and declare your undying love for each other after an hour of making it 'official' by changing your relationship status on Facebook.
I'm 16 and I'm the same way. I just wanna focus on college before I get in a relationship. Also I wanna figure out who I am before I get with someone.
You kidding? I'm a 90's baby and I never did stupid things. I do a few now but not much.
"only one has ever caught my attention" Sorry to be the one to tell you that you are a lesbian.
I see why you're in grammar school...
Uh, like the 70's maybe?
it's always great when people are all "kids today are a sorry lot". sorry but I know what you guys did in the 60's
209, You're describing literally every empire ever.
Honestly, I had the opportunity to lose my virginity at age 13. I came really close to it, but no matter how much I wanted to be in that situation, I chickened out. Why? Because the man was 40 years old and wanted to meet me for sex. Who knows what could have happened? He was a pedophile. I reported him to the FBI instead. The reason I am saying this is: Op, it could have been a lot worse. She most likely had sex with someone her own age. Just think how much worse it would be if the man was much older than her. She should've waited, that's true, but as long as she doesn't engage in other risky activities, and promises to wait a few years before trying to have sex, then it's not that bad. Make sure she knows to be safe and watch for warning signs of rape. I mean it's a scary thought, but knowing before it happens can save her in the future. Just in case. This world is ****** up. Why deny It?
#92 I can relate so well on that it's not even funny
Comment moderated for rule-breaking.
Show it anywayStupid too....
Yes lets lie for the rest of our lives. #53
88, He was referring to this particular situation, not everything in general. Her being honest about losing her virginity at a ridiculously young age isn't going to reverse it. That's the point he was trying to make.
At least she didn't do drugs.
Comment moderated for rule-breaking.
Show it anywayAt least she doesn't drink
#21 They are both equally importantvto worry about
Important to*
You don't know that. She could be drinking when her parents aren't around.
Yes, because drinking isn't as bad as having sex. They're both just as bad especially at that age.
#3 - Doesn't drink? You reckon? Given that she wanted a Daquiri and had no idea what a "virgin" cocktail was, I think we can safely say that her sobriety is likely to be going the way of her virginity....
Comment moderated for rule-breaking.
Show it anywayI'm willing to bet that alcohol was probably involved in her losing her virginity. If she's having sex that young, I'm willing to bet she drinks too.
105, I knew what a strawberry Daiquiri was when I was that age, and didn't know that it was called 'virgin' when it didn't have alcohol in it, and I never drank alcohol and I still don't.
Actually sex at a young age can be very bad for you both for your mental and physical development. A girl is capable of sex from a very young age. In the 1930's a five year old girl in South-America gave birth to a son (who was also her half-brother). This is an extreme case but you can not say that she was ready for this or the sexual act that was forced on her. Likewise a thirteen year old child is not ready to have sex. It can mess up how she perceives it and can stunt her pubescent growth.
159, what an ironic username....puberty does NOT mean children are ready for sex (not for baby producing anyway, which seems to be your reason here). In some countries it's common to marry girls off to older guys as soon as they have their period. They fall pregnant and, guess what? A good number of them die during childbirth because, although they've had their period, their bodies still aren't ready for that.
Wtf. How would you even know if she does or not?
You're all complete morons. Stop stereotyping teenagers and trying to "**** shame", it's pathetic and slightly misogynistic. None of you know anything about this girl.
Only because the drink was impotent...
201 wtf do you think puberty does in a woman if it doesnt prepare the body to carry children. by 15 years old i was fully developed, physically at least, as a woman aa were most of my female classmatew. im not saying that makes sex ok as soon as you are physically capable but think about the age of consent. its 16 where i am from, some people are ready at 15 some are not ready until 17, 18 or even 21 but an age has been picked where most are deemed physically ready.
This generation. 13 is just to young.
Based on your picture, 6 is just right? Just Kidding.
*too
It has been 10 seconds and i have been corrected. I'm so sorry for my terrible mistake of mixing up to and too. I will go sit in the corner now.
First off, all generations have their flaws. Secondly, human nature does not dictate this aspect of how we act, that is determined by how we are raised. So basically, most of the children in my generation are stupid fools, but you are the ones who raised them to be like that.
40 - actually it had been about 8 minutes before I corrected you but I'll cut you some slack this time. ;)
73, the fact that being 13 and not being in a relationship is strange nowadays, just shows how badly our generation is screwed up.
For most of human history, girls would have been married and pregnant by 13 or 14. It's not just young people now, it's young people for all of human history.
On average, throughout history boys were usually older than the girls they were married to. Girls were bargaining chips for their parents, and as a result they had little to no need for education or work in their parent's eyes. Boys did, however, as they were the providers and had to have achieved something before they were deemed "worthy" enough by the parents to marry their daughter.
They also died by 30-50 though. When my grandmother was born, her mom was only 14. The only reason she didn't get shipped out was because she got married.
139, Shipped out? Shipped out where? For what purpose? I'm genuinely curious.
#139, people were NOT dying at an average age of 30-50, especially not people in your grandma's generation. This has got to be my biggest pet peeve about misunderstood history and you just inflated it ridiculously. Any statistics you see declaring 30 to be an average lifespan (which is usually applied to the Middle Ages, not the freaking 1940s) are factoring in young babies' deaths. Lots of kids died young, but generally if you made it past toddlerhood, you were good to go for another 60-ish years. Sorry to go off topic, I was just astounded by the ignorance being spouted here.
169, You beat me to it. 30 or so was the average lifespan. However, since infant mortality was incredibly high, it tended to skew that average down.
DON'T PRETEND OTHER GENERATIONS DIDN'T HAVE THEIR SHARE!
143, they would send them to homes for unwed teenaged mothers or to relatives. They didn't want to be associated with a pregnant teen.
169, I was meaning to make that a separate point. I wasn't meaning around when my Nana was born.
64 i'm sorry they are thumbing you down. I appreciate the correction and found it funny.
thats what society makes you think. back in the olden days at the age of 14 girls were being married.
You realize that before society deemed the teenage years too.young to have sex (which I totally agree with, btw), people In past civilizations were married by that age? I'm js, it's bad, but not a damnable offense
Lost mine at 15, still 15
Well now we know how she lost her Virginity, drinking Strawberry daiquiri, sucks that's she's only 13
Wait...what the actual ****?
Yes, OP's daughter did actual *******.
Am I the only one here actually wondering what the expression on the waitresses face was?
I wonder as well, but, I'm guessing her mouthing holy shit and walking away for a minute.
Comment moderated for rule-breaking.
Show it anywayShe could have done it behind his back like most teenagers do.
It's the kids decision actually... Her dad couldn't be like IF YOU HAVE SEX I WILL SHOOT THE MAN YOU HAD IT WITH! Even if he did then she would've done it just to piss him off. Teenagers aren't exactly known for listening to authority figures very well.
I doubt op was nearby when it happened.
177- whether there's a law or not the kids don't care. They had sex, their decision. How can it not be their decision? A law can't dictate decisions until a certain age..
In Canada, as long as the partner was not over the age of 18, its legal (the age of consent is 16, with close in age laws for persons under 16). Over 18, that nets u the charge of sexual interference of a person under 16 years of age.
#177- Actually, in most states, age is only an issue with an age gap over 2-5ish years. Even so, they won't care, they will do it anyway. parents can only press charges if their kids are under age of consent and they are over the maximum age limit for the state.
Here here!
Congratulations, on the most downvoted FML I've ever seen.
Holy crap in a hat that's the last thing a dad wants to hear from his 13 year old...
yes, but every dad knows it will happen.... eventually
167- My sister tends to say "frick on a stick." It's really entertaining.
Better than "I'm pregnant"
"But dad, i only got 2 STD."
175, So true. Unfortunately, if the daughter keeps up this habit of poor decision making, it will almost undoubtedly lead to that in the near future.
Yeah....I don't know what to say to that. Good luck man
Keywords
1 - Yes, yes she did :)
Don't pretend like any other generation didn't do their share of questionable things.