By Anonymous - 28/12/2014 18:41 - United States - Flower Mound
By HMM - 28/07/2010 11:42 - United States
By "Anti_Sora" - 05/01/2019 00:00
By thairsha - 09/02/2012 11:05 - Japan
By 3rdWheel1stBorn - 23/03/2018 19:00
By it'sabitwindy - 09/12/2011 06:05 - United States
By CARnage - 21/05/2010 10:11 - Australia
By Evjoel - 12/09/2016 10:52 - Bermuda - Hamilton
By Shrekkk - 02/07/2019 06:14
By Mike - 27/05/2021 22:01
By Anonymous - 22/03/2015 09:52 - United States - Las Vegas
By SkinsCastSelection - 17/01/2011 09:53 - France
By doody - 30/12/2009 22:42 - United States
By sting - 06/12/2014 01:32 - United States - Valencia
By quickfingers100 - 01/06/2011 16:05 - United Kingdom
By Anonymous - 11/10/2010 01:16 - United States
By Wtffmlfs - 26/09/2019 04:01
By Anonymous - 13/02/2021 02:01
By Forever Alone - 03/07/2013 04:26 - Canada - Toronto
By beno - 07/01/2009 15:25 - United States
By tiffylueg - 21/06/2016 13:38
By martin1022 - 05/10/2016 11:29 - United States
By Rohirus - 07/06/2012 23:09 - Sweden
By Cuzles - 23/03/2011 16:11 - United States
By xen - 20/12/2020 11:02
By Nice guy finishing last. - 07/04/2017 12:00
By My_Cow_kiM - 28/04/2009 23:05 - United States
By sam - 02/05/2010 00:12 - Australia
By Anonymous - 13/05/2014 05:42 - United States - Las Vegas
By Anonymous - 13/10/2011 23:25 - United States
By Anonymous - 21/11/2013 20:37 - United Kingdom - Bristol
By PainStressLife - 11/11/2013 05:17 - United States - Dublin
By Bali_Boil - 16/01/2010 00:44 - United States
By postop - 26/06/2015 03:06 - United States - Far Rockaway
By Liz - 27/09/2010 19:30 - United States
By ouch. - 10/12/2018 09:30 - United States - Stamford
By mommytobe - 05/08/2011 03:56 - United States
By Adam Gordon - 30/03/2017 14:00
By sad as shit - 01/01/2016 00:41 - United States - Conway
By Anonymous - 28/06/2012 12:08 - Ireland - Dublin
By Anonymous - 27/06/2021 08:01
Add a comment - Reply to : #
#46 yes it is protected which while not a great thing does stand for the protection of all free speech. I for one don't see this as a complete bad thing considering I don't want to see Amy restrictions by the government on what we are allowed to say or think. I believe that us as people should move past such hate but that on a legal level the government shouldn't interfere
I live in Denmark and here we also have the freedom of speech, but we also have something called the rascisme paragraph, where you can get fined if you use your freedom to speak in a rascist manner. So you can be able to speak freely and while still having certain restrictions as to how much hate you'll allow. On a second note I'm not sure if it's a good idea to actually report you're mothe-in-law. Always tricky when it's family.
Just send it back and say, "Didn't you mean this for yourself?" With a winky face.
There's plenty of statistics and the pure fact that at least 3 times a week I have to hear about a black teen or young adult being murdered by the police b/c they feared for their life when an unarmed teen was near them is enough for me. I've seen police brutality up close and personal, I've also seen how my white friends can be drunk, high, armed and driving and not even be detained but I can be sober and sleep but be harassed.
Last year a white homeless man was beaten to death here in Fullerton for resisting arrest. In videos you can hear him sobbing, begging for them to stop, saying he wanted his dad. It's not just black people that police victimize. But, look how many officers are killed in the line of duty versus how many citizens, innocent or criminal, are killed. The only difference between the two is that officers are rarely convicted of their crime when they do go corrupt.
#130, that's terrible! I agree, it isn't just black people. I think people in general are harassed by the police, simply because the police can do anything and say it was self defense. I'm not saying every policeman is a terrible person, as I am married to an officer, but there are some people out there that shouldn't have a badge.
Racism is unacceptable.. but the actual definition is saying one race is superior to another race.. almost everyone forgot the real definition of racism. FYL
13, To be fair, the mother in law was not being racist in this instance. Hateful, yes, but not racist. Pretty much all she did was point out that a black man with anything that looks like a gun will get shot by the police. Granted the 'black ass' part was racist but not the other part.
This is not difficult to understand, though. OP is not saying that this one event mentioned in the FML makes his mother-in-law racist. OP is saying she is a racist, and we don't know the woman to know if she's racist or a 'bigot' as you say. I'm going to trust OP with this one because OP actually knows the person.
#30, you're right you guys are misinterpreting the fml. OP said that he first got a packaged gift from his racist mother-in-law. Then he opened the package and found the squirt gun. Had he called her racist after recieving that, then you have a right to say he misused the term racist. Since he called her racist BEFORE he found out what was inside, this implies that he knows his mother-in-law has actually been racist in the past, giving OP uneasy feelings about the package before opening it. You can't really say that OP misused racist because he referred to the mother-in-law as racist before the opening of the package. IF you knew her personally, then sure, go ahead, but you probably don't.
#27 OP is speaking from experience that she is racist. The adjective doesn't have to refer to what she did here. But the fact that she suggested that he, a black man, take the toy gun and walk around the police station to (she hopes) get his 'black ass' shot sounds pretty racist to me.
Too bad she's your mother-in-law because I would call that a "hate crime"! She deserves jail!