By Cult - 30/03/2014 14:27 - United States - Glenside
Same thing different taste
By branded - 14/05/2009 19:57 - United States
By TatooFAIL - 06/10/2009 14:38 - United States
By Anonymous - 16/05/2012 21:56 - Sweden - V?llingby
By bananamuffin - 30/03/2012 19:13 - United States
By Anonymous - 04/01/2011 04:19 - United States
By popemichael - 19/06/2009 22:48 - United States
By PeeLeg - 11/03/2013 07:43
Great idea
By aridaley - 21/05/2011 23:33 - United States
By scaredinnyc - 14/11/2012 01:03 - United States - Trenton
By twnty1 - 31/05/2010 15:43 - United States
Top comments
Comments
If it's his favorite band it obviously meant something to him so shut up.
I don't understand people who comment things like "it's stupid to get your favorite thing tattooed because preferences can change" or "you knew the band could break up so YDI". First, even if your preferences have changed, the tattoo could represent a certain period in your life, so it's not stupid. Second, if the band breaks up it doesn't mean that it stops being your favorite band. My favorite band is The Beatles and they broke up a few decades before I was born. Anyways, OP, I don't think that you should be upset because now you have a part of the band's history on your body
People who are judging the OP for getting a tattoo in the first place... It's HER body so it's HER business. I bet you don't mind when girls pierce their ears, so why do you consider tattoos a disfigurement of one's body? Just because they are less common than earrings?
i like McDonalds. you won't see me tattoo their logo anywhere.
Its an April fools joke... Bayside wouldnt still be using the logo on guitar picks and album covers if it were true.
get a cover up!
No big deal, the logo still means a lot to you whether they still use it or not. The music is still attached to it.
Way to fall for an april fools joke aha
Keywords
But now you have a permanent part of their history, and it doesn't decrease your appreciation for the band. It's not that bad.
26, at least you tried.