By ausmill12 - 19/11/2012 06:18 - United States - Pensacola
Same thing different taste
Leg it
By BobbyHutchinson - 20/10/2009 15:57 - Australia
Help!
By clip_kate - 01/07/2016 02:36
By Anonymous - 16/09/2010 00:40 - United States
By anonynomi - 19/11/2015 17:26 - United States - San Francisco
Drunk with power
By Anonymous - 29/09/2023 22:00
By Anonymous - 16/09/2014 14:34 - United States - Wallingford
Don't bother
By NoticeTheLackOfNumbers - 12/08/2009 22:43 - United States
By lamed - 04/12/2009 22:01 - United States
Smooth criminal
By Anonymous - 28/04/2012 01:55 - United States - Darien
The Child Catcher
By Not a child hater - 30/10/2024 18:00 - United States
Top comments
Comments
Your intention was good just not very well thought out. (PS does anyone think the manager would have said something? If he was chasing the kid, he would have seen OP right?)
I understand where the police are coming from, you can't really use your car to stop someone. Especially when they are only a teenager and by the sounds of it weren't armed. Also if you had caused the teenager a serious injury sorry to say but they would more than likely have sued you for a lot and very high chance they would have won. Next time if you really want to help just take a picture or video so that maybe it will help ID him and make a case against him stronger.
Aw, what happened to the good Samuratan Law that protects you from this kind of bullshit?
To 33- Actually if you read it the FML OP never actually states they hit the guy they just got arrested for hitting a pedestrian so the guy could have just ran into the car when it was blocking the way, which mind you still counts as hitting a pedestrian because you willfully moved your car into the pedestrains way knowing full well they would hit you. Maybe you should read it again especially since no where in the FML does it say accidently.
The cops always get pissy when you do their job better than them. That's why they're always trying to arrest Batman and Spider-Man.
llama612: I read it fine, thanks. I said accidentally because OP did it without the intention of hitting the thief, correct? Their INTENTION was to block the way of the thief, which IS stated in the FML. If it was UNINTENTIONAL but it still happened, then it was ACCIDENTAL. Maybe you should go back to English class before you try to argue semantics.
That's what you get for trying to be a hero and doing the police's job!
By the way, I'm not saying OP should've played the hero, I'm just saying that he didn't do it on purpose.
I actually happen to work at a Walgreens. When they train you they tell you, the normal employee to NOT go after the thief and only let the managers do it because they could have a weapon on hand and you could get hurt and the company would be liable. So therefore YDI.
See kids, this is why you don't comment after working a 9.5 hour shift. Your brain is too tired to comprehend everything. If a mod sees this, please delete this and my original comment. Thank you Alan.
To maninthemachine He INTENTIONALLY blocked the thief so by INTENTIONALLY blocking the thief he forced the thief to run into his car which doesn't make it an accident. I read it fine thanks :)
Keywords
GTA Logic - Someone runs into your car, you get 1 wanted level
The world is ****** up.