I'm not saying cheating is "right" by any moral standard, but it's in no way below human expectations by traditional standards. "Fidelity" isn't natural for many species, in general. I'm a biologist, but I'm not saying you should take my word for it. Just do some research to better understand, as to not irrationally take a stance on the matter. Overall though? Yes, I do feel bad for the OP, because in American society, monogamy is the prevailing course of intimacy. Her douchenozzle boyfriend should've known better.

#43 I'm glad you are intelligent enough to know all of that because most people aren't. But you read into that way too much. I think it's safe to assume they were referring to moral and not traditional standards. Still, since I am pointing that out I must also point out that it still wouldn't be the "lowest of the low" because there are many other things someone could do that is MUCH worse than cheating. So I guess their comment is invalid either way. But maybe they were thinking that infidelity is against human nature. In that case, I apologize for thinking you read into too much.

I agree that it's definitely not the lowest of the low, but, it's still betrayal, so, even if it's in general human nature, it's still bad. Just because humans normally want to not stay with the same person for too long, if that is what you are saying, doesn't make it okay to do so without telling the other person.

Yup she's going to take grainy little pictures on her phone (I'm sure) to an expert for evaluation .... Right...

You do realize that means people pay others to have sex with them, right? No one said he was being paid to have sex with anyone.