*rimshot*

#188; Rimshot? More like Rim Job..heh. I'll show myself out.

A wise man once said, "Sex is like a boxing match. If both people don't agree to it, one of them is committing a crime."

I desperately hope she is joking. Otherwise, I definitely agree.

maybe she's proving a point and OP like most guys wont STFU about wanting anal sex with her ass and she wants to turn the tables . . . its only fair ;-)

Don't dish what you can't take. It goes both ways. If you're pestering your significant other for anal, don't be a bitch when they ask you for it. Of course, I'll give OP the benefit of the doubt that he doesn't ask her for anal.

I've carefully explained to my girlfriend, that if she tries to put anything in my ass, I'll break up with her no questions asked. Safe to say that I haven't been penetrated.

And that man is John Oliver I believe

Hey man don't knock it till you try it. My boyfriend was super against it. Then he realized what the male g spot is like. Totally worth it.

Just don't slip and fall forwards

I wouldn't turn my back on that girl

Otherwise he wouldn't be able to run, if you catch my drift.

Well, not yet...

you mean buggered

#5

It does. One cannot give consent if they are asleep. OP's girlfriend is either just trying to scare him, or is seriously messed up.

I don't know if they will do anything cause he is a guy but I would call the police if she does it or tries.

Seriously. What's with all the ass rape going on lately on FML?

As long as she inserts something into him, it will be rape. Is she forces him inside her, it would not be.

If she forces his penis in her. That is rape.

40, both are sex acts. It doesn't matter who's inserting into whom, nonconsensual sex acts are sexual assault/rape.

#40- Yes it would. Rape is any kind of sexual intercourse where one person is being forced/unconscious/below the age of consent. I doesn't matter who or how, rape is still rape.

The police definition doesn't count it as rape even though it should be.

@67 That's just bananas.

the banana is right, beind forced to penetrate is not legally considered rape. because apparently getting an erection is a voluntary action, although I think anybody with a penis has had an unwanted boner at some time.

Actually, your body is able to react even if you don't want it to. Many female rape victims experience sensation and even orgasm. Hence the self blaming that many of them admit to. Therefore, even if a male experiences an erection, if he is forced into a sex act that he did not want, it IS legally rape.

banana, its not listed as rape but it is listed as sexual assault. it SHOULD be but anti make propaganda tries to silence speakers. same with domestic abuse.

I assume you mean to say 'anti male propaganda'. Where do you think the idea that men are so tough and always up for sex that they can't be raped came from? It's definitely a view that needs changing but it's way more than some shadowy anti-male organisation at work.

I think they meant "anti rape propaganda." Also, it's not an anti-male organisation, but is actually another issue with female qualities being seen as inferior. Outdated views of gender roles state than men need to be stoic, and vulnerability is seen as feminine, therefore any make displaying vulnerability isn't taken seriously as he is considered to be less masculine than the stoic guy who suppresses his feelings. It's fucking bullshit because it shows the attitude society has towards anything "feminine," which has a negative impact on all genders.

A lot of people argue that men can not be raped because they do get an erection and it is always assumed it is because they are turned on. However men to get a hard on in fearful situations as well as just randomly happening. They do not always have to be turned on to get an erection.

I don't want to sound ignorant, but couldn't you put it in even if he isn't erect? I mean, I don't see the point, but if he never got hard would that still constitute as rape/assault to the police?

You, my friend... Clearly don't understand how laws or rape works. Police don't make the laws, and any police WOULD consider anyone putting anything into or on anyone else, in a sexual manner, without consent as rape. Though in this case it would most likely be specified as forceable sodomy (still an act of rape). Now, proving the crime is the difficult part. Since it's a dildo and there would be no DNA evidence left behind it would be based on tearing and a case of he said she said. THIS would be the fact that police would impress upon the victim, not the fact that they 'weren't raped'.

#67, it depends on the location. I know in the UK, it isn't considered rape, but in some US states it is.

Actually, 40 is right depending in the country. In the USA, rape is defined as penetration, so a man being forced to insert his penis doesn't count. Most countries classify it as sexual assault, not rape, but the charge is the same.

No, that's not true. Not even in the least bit.

After nearly 150 dislikes later, I hope you've come to realize your stupidity.

That is still rape. He would not be a consenting partner

Oh nah???

It's bad when a grown ass man has to fear stereotypical shower rape in his own home from his own girlfriend.

I would suggest calling the police. This surely counts as the threat of rape.This situation is not ok. And more than that, the fact that many people might struggle to make the phone call for fear of society's reaction is not okay. Please protect yourself OP - this is really wrong and she has no right to do that to you or make you feel like this.

Or just take and hide/lock away the dildo and tell the wannabe rapist that no means no. What a fucking nutter.

144 hiding the dido might not stop her. She could very easily use something else.

Just make sure it's not the brown eye that's open.

And she will seek ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)