By alone - 23/09/2011 11:04 - China
Add a comment - Reply to : #
You must be logged in to be able to post comments!
Pentadik, having a partner who 'can' support you is probably more relevant today than in the 1950s, so if she were to fall pregnant or develop an illness or couldn't work for whatever reason, she would have a back up plan. Not saying the man HAS to support her or that it's impossible alone, but I'd say she deserves someone who at least makes an effort to look for jobs instead of screwing other women.
I agree with Pendatik. In today's day in age, no one should be expecting a man to support a woman simply because he's a man. And even looking for a man who COULD potentially support you is far-fetched. In today's economy, it takes two incomes to get by in a comfortable manner. A man shouldn't be expected to financially support (as inferred by the first poster) his girlfriend simply because of what swings between his legs. Nor does a woman "deserve" to be financially supported simply by virtue of being a woman.
What about us women who like being stay at home mothers and our husbands being the only one employed outside the home? I love the way my hubby is kind of like the 50's opens doors, sweet, no problem supporting our family even when we were dating he always paid I never expected him too but I never told him not to
Leave him and tell his ass to get a job.
Are you sure you didn't catch his long-lost twin brother, the one with the terrible accent?