By anonymous / Friday 8 January 2016 06:49 / United States
Add a comment
You must be logged in to be able to post comments!
Create my account Sign in
Top comments
  mariri9206  |  32

I don't think it's the security they hired. It's probably security from who they're leasing from and that person likely won't hire new security.

  leogachi  |  15

@19 It wouldn't be in their best interest to not hire new security because their property is being damaged.

  ThatHorse  |  15

#20, you clearly didn't understand the comment.
Sort of like everyone else.

The Secret Service has been caught on many many occasions trying to cover up their fuckups. Things like Presidential details getting blackout drunk while on duty in the middle of the day and other such things.


#28, That's not the idea. He's not saying that the SS was the security, he's comparing what happened here to their shenannigans. Nowhere did he say, (or even imply), that the President's Secret Service was working security for an ordinary store.

  jake131000  |  21

Guys you have all been to middle school, right? A simile is the comparison of two things using the word like or as. I compared the similarities of the secret service to the security guards at the store. Everyone that disliked my comment is retarded.

By  neuronerd  |  28

You're not going to accept that answer, are you? Surely there has to be legal recourse.

Loading data…