58
By Anonymous - / Friday 26 October 2018 05:00 /
Add a comment
You must be logged in to be able to post comments!
Create my account Sign in
Top comments
Comments
By  BurnInDemonFire  |  24

Boys, and select girls, pick your jaws up off the floor, and help this man out. There are more important things to deal with besides the fact that his wife suggested a threesome with her sister. Apparently.

Reply
  KingAdrock  |  12

No, I'm going to say he deserves some flak for not thinking this one through. His wife suggested an incestuous threesome with her own SISTER and that didn't ring any alarm bells?

AND they didn't use protection?

As another poster said, that's fifty shades of fucked up.

Reply
  Mungolikecandy  |  15

A sensible man who thought with his big head and not his little one would turn it down straight away.

By  Razell  |  12

It's not that bad, just adopt the kid when your wife's sister gives birth.

(I'm assuming the sister doesn't have a husband of her own. Or whatever.)

Reply
  MamaChey  |  22

Simply adopt the baby? Sweets, why the hell would OP adopt a kid who is his biological child? as for the wife? Yes, I’m certain that she’ll want to adopt her sister’s child. It’ll be like a vacation souvenir to remind her of that ‘magical night’

Reply
  Razell  |  12

Simple: the kid's mother is not the father's legal wife, so he has no legal parental rights to the kid. In order to get legal parental rights, he would have to adopt the kid. Adopting the kid would also free him from having to pay child support to his sister-in-law.

Since he mentions that his wife is "still not pregnant", that implies that getting pregnant is a goal for the couple, implying that they want kids. Adopting the kid would give the couple a kid, remove the burden of single-motherhood from the sister(again, assuming that the sister is single), and give the kid a set of stable (... relatively speaking) married parents.

As far as the wife is concerned, the adopting the kid won't be any more or less a reminder of the trio's complete idiocy than seeing the kid every holiday at family reunions. Quite frankly, if the wife didn't want the risk of her husband impregnating her sister, she shouldn't have invited her sister into their bed in the first place.

Alternately, OP needs to get a paternity test on the kid. If dear sister would f*ck her own brother-in-law, who know who else she's been f*cking?

By  bogolopian  |  10

Threesome with the wife's sister is not as rare as many might think. Not done it myself but have friends who have. The pregnancy is a problem that is solvable. Depending on their own beliefs and desires, abortion, adoption or just mum bringing up the child herself. Good luck.

By  MikuandKaito  |  21

If she's crazy enough to initiate a threesome with her own sister, she's crazy enough to place all the blame on you. You /could/ have negated some of that crazy by using protection, but alas the three of you are, in all sense of the word, fucked up.

By  ohsnapword  |  21

Sounds like a Maury episode in the making.

Loading data…