By FML - 05/07/2010 00:15 - United States
By Hank-T4 - 11/10/2015 11:45 - Australia - Truganina
By congrats grad - 08/06/2013 05:12 - United States - Panorama City
By Gaylord - 28/04/2016 02:17 - United States - Aspers
By Boredstoner420 - 14/03/2020 21:00
By Anonymous - 22/09/2017 04:30
By GlassPwn - 19/12/2009 05:01 - United States
By Anonymous - 26/12/2012 08:30 - United States - Evergreen
By Alana - 01/01/2011 05:27 - Australia
By lindsey822 - 08/04/2021 10:59
By Anonymous - 30/04/2009 19:42 - United States
By -_- - 07/10/2015 11:29 - United States - San Francisco
By anahira6 - 27/09/2013 19:41 - United States - Houston
By PukinFireman - 17/10/2009 08:20 - United States
By middleagednurse - 14/01/2015 17:49 - United States - Miami
By jesus christ, dad - 06/09/2013 16:48 - United Kingdom - Manchester
By ConfusedGinger - 10/11/2016 11:50 - United States - Downingtown
By screwed - 24/01/2009 18:56 - Chile
By queenbitch - 20/04/2015 01:39 - United States - Dearborn
By well crap... - 21/06/2020 14:18
By Dr.Anonymous - 22/03/2014 11:56 - India - Mumbai
By ItGirl - 09/11/2014 02:36 - Sweden - Eskilstuna
By Anonymous - 18/12/2012 07:48 - United States
By guyshithappensto - 22/05/2010 02:41 - United States
By Anonymous - 11/07/2019 02:00
By Cherie - 31/08/2009 21:18 - United States
By me - 30/11/2011 06:43 - Canada
By Renter - 24/03/2011 14:54 - United States
By FMyEx - 06/12/2012 11:50 - United States - Southington
By tnt007 - 10/01/2010 21:46 - France
By OiVey - 01/11/2017 18:30 - United States - Padre Island Ntl Seashor
By dmvsucks - 13/09/2010 15:14 - United States
By ashily24 - 07/02/2018 15:00
By Anonymous - 07/12/2010 00:20 - United States
By Anonymous - 16/04/2020 20:00
By kevdev - 09/09/2010 19:58 - United States
By Sugar - 22/11/2008 11:51 - United Kingdom
By oooops - 24/01/2011 19:18 - United States
By J Claire Sanchez - 22/03/2020 15:56
By Anonymous - 12/12/2020 07:56 - Germany - Zittau
By It'd be nice to see you too. - 09/06/2014 02:17 - United States - Minneapolis
Add a comment - Reply to : #
agreed^ if you were truly an asset you wouldn't have to change the way you work in order to obtain a promotion. what makes you think that you are the number 1 option without sales experience. Yeah her boobs are big and fake but if she has any sales experience you can't say anything.
How the hell would you "prove" yourself if you're working in the stocks? Besides, put yourself in the customer's shoes. Especially in retail, if you're a ugly girl and you see an attractive girl wearing the clothes from the store, the customer subconsciously thinks "maybe I can look good too if I wear the same clothes". Stuff your bra and maybe the boss will notice you ;) If your a guy.... um, stuff your crotch and hope your boss is bisexual?? lol good luck either way.
1: As 67 said, she may just be better at sales than you. No need to jump on the bitchy, feminist bandwagon quite yet. 2: Even if he did hire her for her boobs, he did the right thing for the business. My friend owned a bar with a big chested waitress, and she brought in tons of customers. He made the sensible decision in this economy.
Sucks for you OP, but you sound so bitchy. : maybe she's nicer. Maybe, if you're working in retail, for example, she'es better suited because she might be more concerned with her image and therefore makes a huge effort to be fashionable. She might be more sociable and easy to talk to, or she just might be nicer. And more qualified, as other people've said. :P But still sucks for you. Keep trying.
get used to it. this happens in non-sales/customer facing jobs too. big fake boobs like hedi montag = promotion or better job. this will happen to you throughout your career, even in the medical field. But your coworkers who are better educated (Ms, Phd) or experienced will hate you.
136: Sometimes it's obvious. OP: Show up to your next shift or employee review with a giant stuffed bra under your shirt. Or if you really want to make a statement, do the same after taking a short vacation for "medical reasons." Bonus points if you're a guy.
75: Watching too much David Brent again, aren't you? ;) 81: *blushes* I'll answer you despite my embarrassment because it takes guts for a virgin to ask such things-- guts I wished I had when I was a virgin. The position allows for, erm, deeper penetration and more male control (without as much physical exertion as missionary or other male-controlled positions), and causes a visually-pleasing bouncing effect. I suspect the preference also has to do with a sense of domination, spanking convenience, and the implied anal connotations. It's a primal position that tends to have more to do with purely physical, animal satisfaction and less emotional intimacy (screwing or f*cking as opposed to making love).
It's cultural. We have decided that they are a symbol of femininity and thus must be hidden. So... wah lah. They are sexy. I have never heard the idea that they evolved in order to resemble the butt, but I seriously doubt that. In most non-Western cultures, breasts are not considered to be sexual or attractive at all. The same way that other cultures would think our supermodels are unattractive. Most of what we find sexy is cultural. Take a college course in Human Sexuality and you will get SCHOOLED on the ethnocentrism of our visions of sexuality, haha.
The other problem with using evolution to explain things like that is that evolutionary psychology is methodologically flawed. You see something and then retroactively try to explain it. Ex. "I think boobs and butts look the same SO we must have evolved to like boobs because we already liked butts." It is easy to track the path of physical evolution because of the fossil record, but psychological evolution is 99% guesswork. For example, we know that the vagina gradually moved to the front of the pelvis as people started to have face-to-face sex, but maybe they started doing that because they liked boobs, and not because boobs followed? And again, that makes the ethnocentric assumption that all societies work the same way that our does and like the same things. Obviously, "culture" is a difficult idea to socially quantify, making people hesitant to just use it to explain everything, but evolutionary psychology is just as generalizing and useless. In an unrelated note: The USA only has one state (Michigan) that bans discrimination based on looks. They get very few cases, because no one wants to go in and say, "Look, I'm obviously ugly. That's why this person fired/didn't hire/didn't promote me.