By samaris - 08/07/2016 21:19

Today, 5 months after doing a shoot for a stock photo site, someone finally used one of my photos. In an article about meth abuse. FML
I agree, your life sucks 12 311
You deserved it 1 179
Mother's Day: Sweets and Bummers
Between disastrous breakfasts in bed and unusual gifts, Mother's Day is an inexhaustible source of laughter. More…
Previous FML Next FML

Same thing different taste

Next

Top comments

SixthSinEnvy 39

Yay! People are finding and using your site! Think positive. Better than no views at all.

86 3

Comments

SixthSinEnvy 39

Yay! People are finding and using your site! Think positive. Better than no views at all.

86 3
Mpii 11

Also it could be a before and after-type photo. You might be on the before side, highlighting what people could lose.

15 0
lexiieeex3 32

Kinda wondering what OP was taking pictures of that could be used alongside an article about crystal meth...

4 0
watermelon15 35

Comment moderated for rule-breaking.

Show it anyway
0 37
childproofpizza 19

People buy the rights to them, get them without the watermark and use them for ads and billboards

3 0
TheNewGuy03 28

Is this a serious question? Every ad agency (like 6 said), journalistic outlets, and thousands (if not millions) of other sites use them, and I'm not saying this because I happen to be a stock photographer. There are many kinds of stock photos. If people never had need of stock photos, there would be no profit in being a stock photographer.

5 0
cocacola999 27

There are LOADS of stories about meth every day. If you manage to get famous for posing for meth pictures, there should be some serious money.

11 1
lexiieeex3 32

Isn't that a violation of intellectual property?

1 27
tarlax 11

You don't really get what stock photography is, do you?

45 4
TheNewGuy03 28

A stock photographer takes photos of things and uploads them to stock sites like Getty (and its subsidiary, iStock) and Bigstock. Simply put, if a photographer takes an image of a recognizable person, a model release must be signed by that person. If a brand appears in a photo, a property release is required. The same goes for certain major landmarks or monuments. If neither can be obtained, it is for editorial use only. OP most likely signed a model release.

3 0
neirbanian97 8

As long as it wasn't being used as the "after" photo...

14 1
Jachin357 28

That's not exactly what you would have had in mind but ok...

3 0
FalloutScrolls 25

If it's for one of those before/after ads, then let's hope you're before.

4 0