By BornInTheWrongEra - 31/03/2013 06:24 - United States
Add a comment - Reply to : #
You must be logged in to be able to post comments!
You a stupid hoe, you a you a stupid hoe.
Bring out the ol white flag. I just saw an image which depicts a comparison between pink Floyd and Justin bieber. The fact that someone even thinks is a fair comparison Is sad and depressing. The fact that they think Justin is better has caused a small amount of my soul to wither into a pile of despair which was briefly ignited by the fires of blasphemy.
70 - wait, are you saying the day Nicki or Nikki Minaj changes her act, becomes a real artist, actually tries to make music that's good and decent is the day you give up on our generation's music? And our generation's music is great, you're just looking in all the wrong places. I mean, we have Arcade Fire, Radiohead. They' re amazing. Bad music has always been around. Case and point: the Monkees. An artificial band made to mimic the Beatles. Their albums sold more than The Beatles and the Rolling Stones combined, and that was when Beatlemania was still rampant
Nicki Minaj, Justin Bieber, etc. probably won't be remembered 20+ years from now. Most bands and artists of any genre today won't be remembered. The Beatles, Rolling Stones, etc. and those bands will never be forgotten. What makes an artist/band great isn't how many people listen to them, or how many copies they sell. It's the impact they have on music as a whole. I'm not saying The Beatles are the greatest band ever based their musical impact, but they had a far bigger impact on music than any artist today.
I listen to metal, and as part of this music taste, I have talked to other older people with similar tastes, whose favorite bands are Metallica, slayer, led zeppelin and so forth told me that the Beatles were the Justin beibers of today. It's all respective. I'm not saying they are bad or not talented, I personally don't care for them, and find most of their lyrics horribly repetative (yellow submarine) but there was a different environment of music back then. Today, I love so many bands with real raw talent and skill from such unbelievably humble beginnings and have meaningful lyrics, I know my genre is alive and kicking, but there is talent out there in others as well. Look at Adele. I love her voice and her lyrics, and just the way she handles being famous, by never letting the press near her. The Beatles loved attention and every girl was screaming after them like they are for Justin beiber today. I find most older music to just be annoying and repetitive and don't hand out my respect because they were actually the Justin beiber of the day, they have to make me look at the world and see it in a new way, make me feel like when the music starts I and dragged into a new world and when it stops I am no longer there, and make me yearn to go there again. That is music to me. But I digress. The Beatles are 10 trillion times better than the talentless fucks that make up the main stream rap scene, I don't even like the Beatles...
Are people really down voting 185 for having a specific preference in music? I don't care how popular or disliked an artist is at least one person will not like them. For example, you might not like music that's normally way too loud so you'd say you don't like metal. And you know what? That's okay. You can't force someone to like a band. And not every song an artist publishes will be considered a "good song" by everybody. This will get down voted but I'm sure everyone here or anywhere would want to be looked down on for their taste in music. OP go and complain to them if you don't like it. It's not fair to you if they keep blasting that music and they made you take off yours. It's also not fair to other neighbors who don't want to hear your music either. If they refuse to put it down, file a noise complaint. Invest in some headphones to block out the other people and still hear your music.
See what did I tell you. I actually said that for two reasons. One to see what would happen, and two because its the truth. See everyone who down votes someone with a opinion that they don't like well if we look back in history you might find you are kind of like a nazi in world war 2. You had a opinion about hitler and it was bad, you would be killed. Huh seems different when your compared to a nazi now is it. Also thanks 191 for defending me
I just want to add one thing... Nicki Minaj is NOT. RAP. Nor hip hop. People always say they hate rap and hip hop, but are always talking about Lil Wayne or Drake or Nicki Minaj. These people are not rap artists or hip hop artists. This is just plain crap. Hip Hop is like Nujabes, Wu Tang Clan, hell, you could even say Rage Against The Machine is hip hop (it is partially). That is the real stuff.
5 - I hate this generation too, and unfortunately I'm technically considered part of it. The internet does indeed increase the audience for stupidity, however, people's values actually have changed. They change in every generation, typically to be more lax than before. In my opinion it's really sad to see some of the teenagers and what they consider to be "normal" or "acceptable" these days.
How is pop music not real music? The Beatles were extremely poppy, they'd even admit that. Hold me tight if I fell I wanna hold your hand is all pop music written and aimed towards teenage girls, so that's your definition of real music? I love the Beatles but you can't call other music crap considering they were writing songs exclusively to become rich. By the way there's nothing wrong with that and they are the greatest band ever.
The difference between Nikki Manaj and the Beatles is the fact the quality of sound. The Beatles took their time and recorded music that was GOOD. Nikki Manaj makes music that is just loud, obnoxious screaming into the microphone. I love pop music. Like Alanis Morrisette, The Beatles, Maroon Five, etc. I hate crap music. Like Nikki Manaj, Drake, etc.
Who would willingly listen to Nicki Minaj?
When you live in the ghetto what can you say .....