By Anonymous - 05/12/2014 13:44 - United States - San Bruno
Same thing different taste
How very dare you?
By Anonymous - 25/09/2022 21:00 - United Kingdom
Nice try, Susan
By Anonymous - 14/08/2025 00:00
By Anonymous - 30/05/2015 03:07 - United States - Salem
Get off my lawn!
By control your mutt! - 23/02/2022 22:00
Mad lad
By its still broken - 11/06/2015 00:13 - United States - Jacksonville
Thanks Deborah
By Anonymous - 18/06/2022 10:00 - Canada - Lachine
By pist - 13/05/2018 01:30
Smooth criminal
By Anonymous - This FML is from back in 2015 but it's good stuff - United States - Huntingtown
By fionnathehuman - 09/10/2012 22:56 - United States
Vandals
By Interpid traveler - 07/09/2021 05:01
Top comments
Comments
Cite the tender years doctrine in court. Children 7 and under can't generally be held liable for negligent acts. The only caveat is if you failed to adequate supervise him, but as long as your justification is strong your defense should hold. You're lucky he's 7, the legal standard changes at 8.
I'm pretty sure the fact the kid had time to gain access to weed killer, go to the neighbors house and spraying enough to kill the entire garden says not adequately supervised.
You deserve it, it's your kid. No matter the age under 18 the parent is always responsible
21 in some states, at least financially, iirc.
Pretty sure the judge is gonna just laugh this out of court. Let's hope it's put on one of the stupid tv shows so we can watch it.
My neighbor got a $15,000 settlement when her next door neighbor mowed down all her prize winning roses. If the neighbor does competitions, and does well, it's seen as a loss of income.
Why would you even let that go to court? Your ******** kid destroyed something beautiful, you should apologize and pay for it then take parenting classes. Or at least have the common sense to lock up toxic chemicals, what if your 7 year old was stupid enough to drink it?
Your son must really hate your neighbor. This is why we keep chemicals away from little kids.
Well, maybe you should have taught your child to respect other people's property.
"Dead as ****" :,D
Maybe you shouldnt have raised him to be an asshole
CPS should be called on you. You can't leave a 7-year-old child unsupervised. Expecially around chemicals/poisons.
Seriously? When I was 7 or younger my parents let me take myself to the park by myself to make friends with who ever was there at the time. Usually I would go s few times a week. When I was 5 I would play in the road/front garden. There was a very low speed limit with signs saying children playing.
I often wonder if people who leave comments like this, even have children. I watch my daughter like a hawk, but leave her safely in her playroom for one second while heaven forbid I go take a pee, and she's climbing something, or finding the one thing she can't have that I forgot to put away, or breaking the child locks off the drawers. It only takes a second for something to happen. Don't be a dick and make a parent feel worse then I'm sure they already do.
Parents can't watch their kids all the time. My brothers and I would play outside or in the basement when we were younger and our parents didn't watch us constantly. I do agree that OP needs to keep chemicals, like weedkiller out of his son's reach. He may have been trying to help his neighbor by killing the weeds and not understanding that it would kill the roses too. This means the son doesn't understand the harm these chemicals can do and shouldn't be allowed near them.
Keywords
How would a 7 year old get access to weed killer?
He's 7. He should know right from wrong and to stay out of other people's property. Rose gardens aren't cheap and the neighbor probably spent a lot of time on it. I'd be pissed too, 7 year old or not.