79
By anniecook - / Friday 27 November 2009 00:26 / United States
Add a comment
You must be logged in to be able to post comments!
Create my account Sign in
Top comments
By  shankzilla  |  0

why does everybody and their fucking idiot mother use the words 'happy sacks' on this site. its maybe funny the first time they used it; you deserve everything bad that happens to you for referring to your balls and happy sacks.

By  anniecook  |  0

I origionally used balls, but i guess the website just loves to write "happy sacks" i have never used those words in my life, trust me. AND TO EVERYONE ELSE: and im sooo very sorry for that horrible epidemic of "They."i really hope the sky doesnt fall

Comments
Reply
  CaiDog  |  20

71. Please. OP didn't know what to call the thing he helped across the street, so he called it 'they'. 'it' would have been the proper term, but it's probably the only thing OP could think of. Also, start your own thread instead of commenting on 1.

By  shankzilla  |  0

why does everybody and their fucking idiot mother use the words 'happy sacks' on this site. its maybe funny the first time they used it; you deserve everything bad that happens to you for referring to your balls and happy sacks.

Reply
  flying_vegan  |  0

I know! It wasn't particularly funny the first time, now it's just annoying. And sacks? Plural? As in two sacks? Two ball sacks? A sack for each ball? Some people have some weird junk...

Reply
  aero_fml  |  0

Yeah this is starting to piss me off, why change it to happy sacks? There is a lot more fucked up shit going down on this website than reading "testicles" or "nutsack" or "balls". C'mon guys. It's not funny.

Reply
  anniecook  |  0

I origionally used balls, but i guess the website just loves to write "happy sacks" i have never used those words in my life, trust me. AND TO EVERYONE ELSE: and im sooo very sorry for that horrible epidemic of "They."i really hope the sky doesnt fall

By  DynamicDave  |  11

YDI 50 times over for using that overused, annoying euphemism "happy sacks." I hope you get hit in the "happy sacks" 402,561,993,002,729.5 more times, or however many times it takes for you to become a man and stop saying happy sacks! Seriously, why cant you just say "nuts" or "balls" like a normal person! GUH!!!!! /rant

By  DRC84  |  0

i can't believe this type of crap gets published. Who's in charge here? this one doesn't even make any sense and it's definitely not interesting. He first talks about one guy and then refers to multiple "women." this is plagued with error. "they were a woman?" pathetic. make sense next time and let's try to keep crap from being published. and also, yes, people need to stop using "happy sacks." don't be an idiot.

Reply
  Coldie  |  0

There's no other easier way to phrase it in English. "They" is often incorrectly used to refer to a person of undetermined gender, but the practice is so widespread everyone understands it. The only other option is to use "he or she" which wouldn't work at all in this sentence and would completely give away the FML immediately if used.

Loading data…