By anniecook - 27/11/2009 00:26 - United States
Add a comment - Reply to : #
You must be logged in to be able to post comments!
YDI 50 times over for using that overused, annoying euphemism "happy sacks." I hope you get hit in the "happy sacks" 402,561,993,002,729.5 more times, or however many times it takes for you to become a man and stop saying happy sacks! Seriously, why cant you just say "nuts" or "balls" like a normal person! GUH!!!!! /rant
i can't believe this type of crap gets published. Who's in charge here? this one doesn't even make any sense and it's definitely not interesting. He first talks about one guy and then refers to multiple "women." this is plagued with error. "they were a woman?" pathetic. make sense next time and let's try to keep crap from being published. and also, yes, people need to stop using "happy sacks." don't be an idiot.
There's no other easier way to phrase it in English. "They" is often incorrectly used to refer to a person of undetermined gender, but the practice is so widespread everyone understands it. The only other option is to use "he or she" which wouldn't work at all in this sentence and would completely give away the FML immediately if used.
why does everybody and their fucking idiot mother use the words 'happy sacks' on this site. its maybe funny the first time they used it; you deserve everything bad that happens to you for referring to your balls and happy sacks.
I origionally used balls, but i guess the website just loves to write "happy sacks" i have never used those words in my life, trust me. AND TO EVERYONE ELSE: and im sooo very sorry for that horrible epidemic of "They."i really hope the sky doesnt fall