are you that retarded?

It's definitely still cheating..whether you're aware of it or not.

I feel like cheating isn't the main problem here, i mean the guy had sex and impregnated an underage girl, which is absolutely disgusting, He could and should go to jail

Here's the thing about "underage" people. I mean we have no idea how old O.P. And her son or husband are. For all we know they're 19 or 20 years old and said underage girl is 17 soon to be 18. At that point you're talking a two year difference and she's almost an adult. There is a fine line between underage and actually statutory rape. Now is OPs husband 31 and she's 15? That is not ok and needs to be dealt with accordingly.

It wouldn't matter if they were 19, 20, or if the girl was 17 soon to be 18, underage is still underage. He should have thought about what he was doing, knowing he'd have to face these consequences. As for OP, report them to the police. He'll go down for statutory rape, and the girl's mother will be forced to take her back since she's a minor or she'll be looked after by someone else.

You're right 97. Because before you turned 18 if you found someone who was 18 you would never think to have sex with that person. Or vise Versa if now you find someone who you love or that you've been with for 3 years now and you turned 18 you're saying you wouldn't have sex with them until they turned 18? Tomorrow is your boyfriends 18th birthday but you can't sleep over so for his birthday you guys have sex the night before. Still rape right? Get ******* over yourself. If someone is 17 and I just turned 18 and we've been dating for the last 3 years I would stop having sex with them because of a couple month age difference. If you truly believe that is still considered rape then you are what is wrong with society.

It is legally rape. It doesn't matter how you view it, when there is a certain amount of age difference between two minors or an adult sleeps with a minor, it is rape. You cannot legally consent in those situations.

Depends, 104. My state has "Romeo and Juliet" laws, so if the two people involved are within (I believe) two years of each other, then it isn't considered statutory rape or illegal- especially if the two were involved before one of them turned 18. I don't know about other places and if they have similar laws, but sometimes it isn't so black and white.

Did no one catch his blatant sarcasm? Just me? Okay.

Many states have the Romeo and Juliet clause. If you're underage but it's 2 years or less it's legal.

It's actually around 4 in some states. and some states also have differing ages of consent, some states it's 16

In Europe, legal age for consent is 16 for many countries. Just a random fact.

Another random fact: in the time of Romeo and Juliet, the legal age of consent was about 12

OP is the one that needs to grow a pair..

No they both do.

He apparently has a pair already, as they were deep inside that minor.

Hell, she doesn't even owe them that. Their living arrangements should be the last of her worries. What she needs to worry about is the lesson that her son will get from this situation by letting people take advantage of her.

Why should she give them money for it? Just kick them out. Who cares where they go?

I guess to give them money so that a pregnant teenager isn't sleeping on the streets. Whatever the crimes of OP's husband the girl shouldn't have to sleep on the streets. Hopefully her family is understanding and takes her back.

How is that her problem?

She doesn't owe them anything, that's correct - giving them money for a night would simply make it easier to get rid of them without having to call the police, and would also probably fit OP's character better since I bet she'd feel guilty for making them leave even though they're the ones invading her home.

#56 it isn't OP's problem but it is the humane thing to do to at least give them somewhere to stay for the night if they can't get one themselves.

Great idea, especially because the OP is a pushover. But also because the of the young pregnant women. And also because if they are in the US and stay in her place for more than 30 days they are legal tentants, and then our kind hearted OP will never get them out.

I understand op wanting to house them, especially the pregnant teen. I agree with sending them to a hotel. And no, op doesn't owe them this, but she obviously feels it's the right thing to do. But at the very least op, you shouldn't be giving up your bed. You've shown a lot of generosity here and no one would blame you for wanting to sleep in your own bed, and to also be able to have a quiet place to retreat to while all this is going on under you house. I suggest you ask your husband what he plans to do (help him with that plan even if that makes you feel better). But if he doesn't get a job or has no goals than they'll be living with you as long as you allow them too, which by the sounds of your personality, could be a very long time! Oh, and I'd be getting the paperwork started for a divorce if I were you.

Passive idiocy comment for the win. Totally YDI OP. I think you should also babysit the kid when he/she comes along so your husband and his girlfriend can spend some quality time together in your bed. Make sure to have dinner ready for them while you're at it.