Legally a drunk person cannot give consent so having sex with a drunk person is considered rape. However, if it's your significant other or a previous partner, this is not an accurate method as the drunk person could likely be fine with it regardless (as I'm sure OP was when that happened). I doubt it would hold up in any court. Therefore I think OP's gf meant drunk sex with someone you've never slept with before. Not to say she should've broken up with you over that, but you both could have been clearer and more understanding.

Modern day feminists... oh my. Needless to say, they have one rule for themselves, another for everyone else and call it equality. As to the the OP, I admire you speaking up, albeit in not a particular smooth way.

If you know the person isn't able to make logical decisions, without communication while sober it's fine to have sex with them while drunk, I'd consider it rape. If both are too drunk to make logical decisions, neither could really consent so there's not really much you can do. Just like sex with a sleeping person, unless prior consent that in that situation it's fine, it's rape.

Legally, she's right.

Aren't double standards awesome!?

Sounds like you could do so much better.

Well, your girlfriend is a rapist, are you truly surprised by her reaction?

At least you have common sense

This is one of those "technically right, but you're missing the point" times, it seems. Sure, she said "100%", and she meant it. But the idea behind it is that people shouldn't be taking advantage of drunk people. Between two people in a serious relationship - especially to the point of living together - there is often an understanding that it's acceptable. Hell, sometimes couples even discuss this. So yes, you were technically right, but sometimes being technically right will get you in to trouble because you're missing a greater point.

I'd vote your life sucks but it seems it just got better. I voted you deserved it, because you can do better