By bip - 15/12/2008 05:36 - France
Same thing different taste
By PizzaPants - 29/02/2016 18:12 - United States - Denver
By HarvestMoon_gal - 24/07/2010 05:09 - United States
Kitchen nightmare
By cookiemonster - 13/08/2013 16:10 - South Africa - Johannesburg
By .. - 13/09/2011 14:48 - United States
By princess - 08/09/2018 13:00
Kitchen nightmares
By Anonymous - 19/09/2021 00:30 - Australia - Mypolonga
By numbtongue - 13/03/2015 04:19 - New Zealand - Dunedin
By Anonymous - 04/03/2011 17:18 - Germany
By My__life___ - 21/05/2014 00:53 - United States - Chicago
By burnt - 13/08/2012 04:43 - Australia - Middle Swan
Top comments
Comments
Comment moderated for rule-breaking.
Show it anywayWhy?•____•
It's a frying pan. What precisely were you expecting?
Now you can commit crimes without worrying about getting caught.
Now we are gunna have 500 other people burning their finger prints off to get away with crimes. Thanks number 10 lol
i hope op didnt do it with every single finger on his hand. and for no finger prints at all he had to dive right in there with both hands.
No, the police will simply have to look for someone lacking fingerprints.
Yeah, I guess burning off your fingerprints is much more practical rather than, I don't know, wearing gloves?
#10 Practical thinking Turn you FML into a positive scenario
rock on. I almost did the same thing with the heat lamp at my work, in the pass-thru. (i work at a restaurant), because it looked like the bulb was out. I am glad i did not, we are open for 24 hours, and those things are never turned off. Luckily i asked my manager first, otherwise, i may not have fingers. I need those. Be grateful, because after asking my boss, she told me why one of my coworkers carries her tray with her left hand...and why she does not have the tips of her fingers on her dominant hand.
I can help shorten it by just a smidgen. I nearly burned my fingers off on a heat lamp.
sounds like you got... burned
# 10 if you dont have fingerprints then that makes it even more obvious that you did a crime! not a lot of people don't have fingerprints!
But more then one person does so they cant prove anything.
But a lot of people would wear gloves, so it really is no different.
True! But I know a person who actually HAS a fingerprint! Im not lying, im serious
#14 But you can't prove that the reason there were no prints was that the perp had no prints. He could have been wearing gloves.
Keywords
Now you can commit crimes without worrying about getting caught.
It's a frying pan. What precisely were you expecting?