By bip - 15/12/2008 05:36 - France

Today, I wanted to see if the frying pan was hot. I no longer have fingerprints. FML
I agree, your life sucks 8 859
You deserved it 57 320

Add a comment

You must be logged in to be able to post comments!

Top comments

Now you can commit crimes without worrying about getting caught.

It's a frying pan. What precisely were you expecting?

Comments

Comment moderated for rule-breaking.

Show it anyway

Fingerfood! lolZ.

LULZ! i dont want fingerprints. that would be effing sweet

It's a frying pan. What precisely were you expecting?

Now you can commit crimes without worrying about getting caught.

Now we are gunna have 500 other people burning their finger prints off to get away with crimes. Thanks number 10 lol

i hope op didnt do it with every single finger on his hand. and for no finger prints at all he had to dive right in there with both hands.

Fingerprints do grow back...

No, the police will simply have to look for someone lacking fingerprints.

Yeah, I guess burning off your fingerprints is much more practical rather than, I don't know, wearing gloves?

#10 Practical thinking Turn you FML into a positive scenario

rock on. I almost did the same thing with the heat lamp at my work, in the pass-thru. (i work at a restaurant), because it looked like the bulb was out. I am glad i did not, we are open for 24 hours, and those things are never turned off. Luckily i asked my manager first, otherwise, i may not have fingers. I need those. Be grateful, because after asking my boss, she told me why one of my coworkers carries her tray with her left hand...and why she does not have the tips of her fingers on her dominant hand.

I can help shorten it by just a smidgen. I nearly burned my fingers off on a heat lamp.

sounds like you got... burned

... wow but seriously dude, you need to go steal shit now :)

# 10 if you dont have fingerprints then that makes it even more obvious that you did a crime! not a lot of people don't have fingerprints!

But more then one person does so they cant prove anything.

Depending on how many fingerprint-less people live in that area. My guess is not many. Although w/o fingerprints it could just look like op was wearing gloves, which I'm surprised more criminals don't think of.

But a lot of people would wear gloves, so it really is no different.

True! But I know a person who actually HAS a fingerprint! Im not lying, im serious

#14 But you can't prove that the reason there were no prints was that the perp had no prints. He could have been wearing gloves.