108
Add a comment
You must be logged in to be able to post comments!
Create my account Sign in
Top comments
Comments
Reply
  hama806  |  19

That's failure to disclose. You should see a lawyer about that. You might be able to get out of there without having to sell or lose a lot of money.

Reply
  LovesSushi  |  25

Does it have to be disclosed if people are only making statements about it and nothing has currently been proved? I know that here in Wa state you won't be told if anyone has died in the home unless you ask.

Reply
  JanisEvans  |  10

These to things are completely different and unrelated.

Reply
  LovesSushi  |  25

I'm just trying to say that you must ask very specific questions to receive certain information. Depending on where you live, it may not be considered failure to disclose, but I don't know. I'm not a lawyer.

Reply
  Cilleemaan  |  4

The seller has to disclose material facts, you don't have to ask anything, that is how the law is in most English speaking western countries and it is especially strongly enforced on real estate. Think about it, there are hundreds of things that could affect the price of a house in a big way -- material facts -- do you think the law would expect an ordinary buyer to know all of them and ask all of them? What remedy they can get, a refund or large discount, that she'll need to ask a local real estate lawyer about. She should get a fresh real estate lawyer -- not the lawyer who handled the sale. The lawyer who handled the sale might be one of the people she is naming in the suit, but definitely her suit would name the real estate agents and seller. Really, she should move out, don't stay more than months. Rent if you need to.

Reply
  Cilleemaan  |  4

Someone dying in a home doesn't affect resale value, therefore it is not a "material fact", it is more like trivia. In older parts of the country most homes have had people die in them at some time or another. Sure, someone recently dying might deter the odd buyer, but two years down the road it won't affect the resale value of the house. Being built on or next to a toxic waste dump -- that hugely affects the value and the effect will not go down over time, that makes it a material fact. Something that required a large expenditure to fix, like cracked foundation walls hidden behind wall panels, that could be a material fact too.

By  screenager5  |  35

Well let's just hope you don't grow any extra appendages or eyes!

Reply

Rude much? When I read this I instantly thought of the fish from the Simpsons.... Three eyes? Obviously biology doesn't work that way, it's called joking. Maybe you should familiarize yourself with it lol

Reply

A "biology degree". How convenient that you have one just so you can say that in response.

Reply

72- Generally on most websites commenters who have been picked on always end up having a degree on the exact subject that was brought up. Sometimes they actually do. A lot of times it's fluff. Either way, flaunting a degree, real or fake, to some strangers online is just beating your chest really. I would know. I have a Social Networking Commenting Degree.

Reply
  screenager5  |  35

60- Or, ya know, I actually just have that degree because that's what I chose to study in college. And yes, it is convenient. That's why I brought it up.

Reply
  Voij  |  16

He might just be fine, depending on how well he can inform himself and stuff. The "are claiming" in the post reminded me of a somewhat similar story here in Germany: A telecommunication company decided to build a new sending mast near a city. Only about 2 months after it was built, a petition went out to have it abolished because the people living near it had complained about constant headaches, increased stress and regular collapses. The company answered to these claims by stating: "Man, that sounds really bad. Wonder what will happen when we actually turn that thing on." So what I'm saying here is that not all toxic waste dumps are actually dangerous for the people who are living nearby. You first have to make sure whether you can see this whole thing rationally and if so just need to find out how much danger the dump actually poses.

Reply
  jem970  |  19

The fact that the word TOXIC was used to describe the dump makes me wonder. Also, cancer is a bit more serious than a headache and generally people who claim to have cancer actually do because they went to a doctor for a check up and something abnormal was found.

Reply
  Voij  |  16

#81, that still doesn't necessarily mean that this case of cancer was caused by the waste dump. Remember those thousands of cases that said that mobilephones caused cancer? And people who said that microwaves caused cancer? A connection between these things and cancer could not be proven to date, even though there've been dozens of studies so far.

Reply
  oj101  |  33

Why do people even live in such areas? It would hardly be a picturesque place if it used to be a toxic wasteland - so why did OP even look there?!

Reply
  evilplatypus  |  34

50 - Actually, landfills usually look rather nice once they're sealed up. I know quite a few that have been turned into parks and nature preserves. Most of them don't look like the backdrop of a bad 1980's superhero movie.

By  BlackRogue  |  8

You might be able to get your money back.. I'm not sure in the states, but in Canada I think there's a law against realtors not informing clients about potential hazards like that.. Good luck!

Loading data…