By toxic waste - 12/02/2013 04:18 - United States - Tonawanda
By ryu1356 - 22/09/2015 13:24 - United States - Dallas
By ihateteenagers - 30/12/2010 02:12 - United States
By K-Rat - 09/10/2016 12:16 - United States
By anonymous - 05/07/2013 06:11 - United States - Saint Paul
By terrified - 18/01/2012 19:02 - United States
By Anonymous - 11/03/2010 05:04 - United States
By Mavis - 03/02/2009 07:54 - Canada
By anonymous - 27/10/2009 13:27 - United States
By black hoodie - 19/05/2013 23:07 - United States - Shrewsbury
By UsedForSurgery - 28/10/2017 01:30
By macguy - 20/10/2016 14:25 - Philippines - Quezon City
By BurnedDown - 28/10/2014 20:45 - United Kingdom - Bridlington
By My sister is a scumbag - 09/04/2021 17:00
By FMJoblessL - 04/02/2010 05:02 - United States
By Anonymous - 04/03/2015 18:20 - United States
By Anonymous - 12/02/2019 00:00
By Anonymous - 12/09/2014 20:47 - United States - San Francisco
By Anonymous - 14/03/2012 06:15 - Australia
By fuck family - 17/07/2013 20:13 - Poland - Walbrzych
By melonhead77 - 29/03/2012 11:46 - Cyprus
By Anonymous - 24/06/2019 22:04
By Anonymous - 22/05/2012 20:49 - Canada - Edmonton
By Anonymous - 05/07/2009 05:59 - United States
By preggers - 08/02/2010 10:52 - United Kingdom
By zaynemaliksvagina - 24/06/2015 17:10 - United States - Shrewsbury
By Username - 04/12/2010 21:04 - United States
By Joshua - 03/06/2016 17:53 - United States - Weatherford
By vishuzzbabe77 - 22/08/2011 06:04 - United States
By goldie09 - 18/02/2010 17:36 - Canada
By 9gingerface66 - 15/01/2012 06:29 - United States
By Cheating - 27/01/2012 23:52 - United States
By Anonymous - 14/03/2010 20:30 - United States
By warp_routine - 31/03/2009 14:17 - United States
By anon - 25/12/2014 20:20 - United States - Irwin
By bigbill - 03/08/2011 04:45 - Canada
By traveller - 13/04/2009 10:45 - United States
By marysparklez - 05/03/2021 22:59
By Anonymous - 02/10/2009 08:37 - Australia
By Anonymous - 12/02/2015 20:14 - Canada - Ajax
By Tiffer27 - 25/01/2016 18:02 - United States
Add a comment - Reply to : #
Not to sound rude but you should've done research before buying
The seller has to disclose material facts, you don't have to ask anything, that is how the law is in most English speaking western countries and it is especially strongly enforced on real estate. Think about it, there are hundreds of things that could affect the price of a house in a big way -- material facts -- do you think the law would expect an ordinary buyer to know all of them and ask all of them? What remedy they can get, a refund or large discount, that she'll need to ask a local real estate lawyer about. She should get a fresh real estate lawyer -- not the lawyer who handled the sale. The lawyer who handled the sale might be one of the people she is naming in the suit, but definitely her suit would name the real estate agents and seller. Really, she should move out, don't stay more than months. Rent if you need to.
Someone dying in a home doesn't affect resale value, therefore it is not a "material fact", it is more like trivia. In older parts of the country most homes have had people die in them at some time or another. Sure, someone recently dying might deter the odd buyer, but two years down the road it won't affect the resale value of the house. Being built on or next to a toxic waste dump -- that hugely affects the value and the effect will not go down over time, that makes it a material fact. Something that required a large expenditure to fix, like cracked foundation walls hidden behind wall panels, that could be a material fact too.
Well let's just hope you don't grow any extra appendages or eyes!
72- Generally on most websites commenters who have been picked on always end up having a degree on the exact subject that was brought up. Sometimes they actually do. A lot of times it's fluff. Either way, flaunting a degree, real or fake, to some strangers online is just beating your chest really. I would know. I have a Social Networking Commenting Degree.
Move out quick! I would put the house back up for sale and stay at moms for awhile?
Well, that sounds fun :( FYL, though it is true you should have researched the place first. Hope you'll be okay, OP.
He might just be fine, depending on how well he can inform himself and stuff. The "are claiming" in the post reminded me of a somewhat similar story here in Germany: A telecommunication company decided to build a new sending mast near a city. Only about 2 months after it was built, a petition went out to have it abolished because the people living near it had complained about constant headaches, increased stress and regular collapses. The company answered to these claims by stating: "Man, that sounds really bad. Wonder what will happen when we actually turn that thing on." So what I'm saying here is that not all toxic waste dumps are actually dangerous for the people who are living nearby. You first have to make sure whether you can see this whole thing rationally and if so just need to find out how much danger the dump actually poses.
#81, that still doesn't necessarily mean that this case of cancer was caused by the waste dump. Remember those thousands of cases that said that mobilephones caused cancer? And people who said that microwaves caused cancer? A connection between these things and cancer could not be proven to date, even though there've been dozens of studies so far.
That's something they have to disclose, you should be able to back out of the deal.