Uh... Why? It's not her house, and they're not her kids. It's got nothing to do with her whatsover!

Separating the art from the artist is all well and good for some academic exercises, but the reality of the situation with Rowling is that at least some portion of the money you spend on HP merch and ends up in her pockets will go towards viciously anti-trans causes and organizations - And I'm not comfortable with any action I've taken helping to fund that - Especially in the very direct through-line that is there with her. Watching/reading her stuff boosts numbers for her and keeps her as a relevant pop-culture figure - Which she (and her even more transphobic/homophobic/etc. friends and allies) uses to promote her awful beliefs and try to convince others that since she's so popular, people must agree with all her abhorrent opinions. So, yeah, again, definitely don't want to give her any more clout (however minuscule my individual contribution would be - But that's how aggregate stuff works). Finally, I'm well aware that there's no truly ethical consumption under capitalism, and that many of the things I buy or services I use directly fund awful things in the world. And yeah, I could probably do some good by not purchasing them - It's not even always a matter of need, but preference and comfort. And I guess, when they get to be as uncomfortable for me as the idea of my money going to Rowling, I'll be forced to confront myself on that. So, yeah, I'm not a perfect being, nobody is. But one of the ways I've chosen to theoretically make the world less-bad is not giving any money to someone who is clearly a bigot and actively making things worse for a minority that already has a pretty rough go of it.

Everything you wrote is correct, but your views on JKR. But as you said I won’t change what you’re thinking. :D