106
Add a comment
You must be logged in to be able to post comments!
Create my account Sign in
Top comments
By  PlutoSA  |  0

That's when you say "I'm actually a common-law attorney investigating allegations of incorrect labour practice. I'll listen to your excuses now, but I'm not going to believe any of them."

Comments
Reply
  5t3ff1k4h  |  42

52- That's discrimination, and they can get in a lot of shit if their boss finds out they refused to hire someone for aesthetic reasons. OP- Hopefully it's because you didn't have the required credentials or you didn't meet the criteria.

Reply
  axxhelairon  |  0

Reply
  5t3ff1k4h  |  42

95- According to the law, everyone has the right to fair treatment. Meaning, they can't be refused at an interview because they're of a particular race, gender, orientation, etc. The only reason why a person may be refused like that is because they were dressed unprofessionally. It's a universal unspoken rule that one must dress modestly and appropriately when going to an interview. 97- Please refer to the latter half of my previous paragraph.

Reply

Perhaps the interviewer had a hot but poorly-qualified candidate in mind, and he wanted to stack the odds in his or her favor. Why yes, it is Conspiracy Theory Wednesday. Incidentally, it is also Rosh Hashanah. Shana tova!

Reply
  libertarian  |  0

Desperation. hard rimes call fir sucking up your dignity. Who knows, maybe the op can change their mind. Or considerit practice. Practice makes perfect and a job interview is no different.

Reply

Perhaps the interviewer had a hot but poorly-qualified candidate in mind, and he wanted to stack the odds in his or her favor. Why yes, it is Conspiracy Theory Wednesday. Incidentally, it is also Rosh Hashanah. Shana tova!

By  PlutoSA  |  0

That's when you say "I'm actually a common-law attorney investigating allegations of incorrect labour practice. I'll listen to your excuses now, but I'm not going to believe any of them."

Reply
  rob935  |  5

Too many negative votes, comment buried. Show the comment

Reply
  libertarian  |  0

then I'd reply this business has the right to higher someone based on our standards. it could have been a job as a personal trainer and the op is a lil fatties.

Reply
  PlutoSA  |  0

@24 Congratulations, you managed to turn a hypothetical rebuke into an advert for the dangers of idiocy and ignorance in the space of one statement. I envy your dedication. And by dedication, I mean lack of comprehension for the concept of contextualisation. And by that I mean you were being a damn idiot.

Loading data…