Wow, whatta bastard. Tell him to go **** himself.

counter sue. Good Samaritan law.

Man, if you could turn back time: Sit back and roast marshmallows on his vehicle fire, watch that ****** burn alive!  If there was no fire, start one.

this goes to show that no good deed ever goes unpunished. that's why i'm oblivious, apathetic and indifferent to such accidents and mind my own business. today, we live in a litigious society. i say, you should have just left him to die. bastard!

This is really stupid, And this person is an ungrateful bittch _|_ fyl :/

Oh please! He should be grateful he has back problems and not dead! He should be paying OP whatever million dollars for being a good samaritan and saving his life, instead of bitching about something as stupid as that. -_-

first rule: scream loudly DO YOU NEED HELP before touching them. if they aren't coherent or say yea you'd be in the clear

good Samaritan law. you can't he found guilty.

people are such f***ing a**holes

What a cocksucker.

Depending on the jurisdiction and the situation of the 'rescue', you certainly MAY be liable. In many jurisdictions (I don't know anything about Canada), 'imminent peril' is required for the 'Good Samaritan' laws to kick in. If he was trapped in the car, but there was no fire, no severe bleeding, no danger of a second collision -- in other words, no reason to immediately pull the victim out -- you may still be liable, and you ought to be. There's a reason you're not supposed to move people directly after a possible spinal incident, as you can injure them if you don't know what you're doing.

sadly in america he will most likly win. one of the few things i hate about usa