FML : Today, I was fired when a customer called corporate, saying I was unprofessional and rude. The "customer" in question was my little sister, who I would...

FML - The follow-up

Today, I was fired when a customer called corporate, saying I was unprofessional and rude. The "customer" in question was my little sister, who I would not let buy beer with a fake ID. FML

I agree, your life sucks

You deserved it

Kannachan13 Say more :

Op here. It's an at will state, and the store had a strict please-all-guests policy. From what I was told it was out of my bosses hands as they actually called corporate and there was no proof it was her. As far as parents well I doubt anything will come of that

By Kannachan13 / Wednesday 28 August 2013 23:02 / United States - New York

Work

Add a comment

You must be logged in to be able to post comments!

Create my account Sign in

Top comments

By packrat | 26

#5648910 - Thursday 29 August 2013 11:28

Surely they have to keep a record of who the complainant is??? And when the alleged incident occurred? Her childish behaviour warrants her being dragged by the ear to your head office to please explain.

By noir_heart | 8

#5648913 - Thursday 29 August 2013 11:31

Did they not know who filed the complaint or why the complaint was really sent? Because they should probably check that out first... Bring your sister to your boss to explain what she did, why she did, and to apologize.

Comments

By packrat | 26

#5648910 - Thursday 29 August 2013 11:28

mattjamt | 16

#5648944 - Thursday 29 August 2013 11:57

Its their way of saying they don't want to bother with you/your sister. Welcome to the corporate world.

By noir_heart | 8

#5648913 - Thursday 29 August 2013 11:31

noir_heart | 8

#5648920 - Thursday 29 August 2013 11:37

I just realized I basically re-worded the first comment. Whoops.

packrat | 26

#5648925 - Thursday 29 August 2013 11:40

It's OK. I'll give you a thumbsup anyway :)

By StraightEdge325 | 11

#5648918 - Thursday 29 August 2013 11:35

Little sisters, they're cunts.

demonmonkey | 13

#5649005 - Thursday 29 August 2013 12:34

This just means OP has to get some serious revenge

warehouse_rat | 8

#5649268 - Thursday 29 August 2013 04:02

that would imply usefulness ;p

kingdomgirl94 | 27

#5649392 - Thursday 29 August 2013 05:09

like making up for the lost money until you get a new job, with an involvement of the parents and a smack.

By dayaCouture | 3

#5648919 - Thursday 29 August 2013 11:36

I dont believe something like that can get you fired .

By Docbee | 11

#5648923 - Thursday 29 August 2013 11:38

It sounds like lazy management or they were just trying to find a way to fire you.

thatnucca | 36

#5649635 - Thursday 29 August 2013 08:13

Nah OP's sister's lemonade business is where it's at...

By Verst | 16

#5648927 - Thursday 29 August 2013 11:40

Obviously corporate didn't dig deeper into the complaint. Oh I don't know, maybe ask you about it?

By Verst | 16

#5648929 - Thursday 29 August 2013 11:43

EDIT: Ignore my first comment. Talk to your boss and have your little sister explain the shit she tried to pull.

By raytyler26 | 16

#5648931 - Thursday 29 August 2013 11:45

Haha she made you her bitch.

By purebliss_fml | 19

#5648932 - Thursday 29 August 2013 11:45

Unfair dismissal? Surely they should be investigating all complaints and not firing you off the words of one 'customer '. Also you should receive three written warnings (depending on the severity of the complaints) before you are fired.

Catahoulaqueen_fml | 17

#5648965 - Thursday 29 August 2013 12:13

Not necessarily. some states are 'right to work states.' they can fire you at pretty much anytime for any reason. it's a shitty deal, really.

purebliss_fml | 19

#5649024 - Thursday 29 August 2013 12:50

That is a shitty deal. I live in Australia and you can't just fire someone without good reason to and you must put everything in writing or risk having the former employee take legal action.

TheDrifter | 23

#5649053 - Thursday 29 August 2013 01:11

Right to work doesn't mean they can fire you for nothing. That's the "at will" employment law. Right to work is about the choice whether or not to join a union. Who keeps spreading this misinformation?