Bad at maths
By Anonymous - 21/05/2022 22:00
By Anonymous - 21/05/2022 22:00
By Anonymous - 07/08/2018 04:43
By Anonymous - 13/04/2024 23:00
By Anonymous - 12/04/2024 08:00 - United Kingdom
By Patrick - 29/10/2020 03:08 - Trinidad and Tobago - Couva
By Anonymous - 16/06/2024 08:00 - United Kingdom
By Anonymous - 26/06/2024 05:00 - United Kingdom
By Anonymous - 21/06/2022 00:00
By Ihatemyjob - 24/04/2019 06:00 - United States
By anabolic - 27/02/2009 23:05 - United States
By Underpaid - 08/05/2022 12:00 - Canada
If his offering overtime because its necessary, doesn't that mean that the lads have worked the necessary hours (e.g. 8hrs) but more work still needs to be done. If that is the case, then wont it be that if the lads pay is increased to 26 an hour, then still the lads will work 8hrs, however, because there is still more work to be done (since the overtime is out of necessity), then your overtime hours are still going to be the same, however, you are now paying 26 for the normal time worked plus 1 and half times of 26 (as opposed to 18). In my view, increasing the lads pay will actually be catastrophic, unless my math's is bad
Screw you all for using child labor and being sexist at it, too! Only lads, no lassies? Let the boys have a childhood, Scrooge!
Keywords
Screw you all for using child labor and being sexist at it, too! Only lads, no lassies? Let the boys have a childhood, Scrooge!
If his offering overtime because its necessary, doesn't that mean that the lads have worked the necessary hours (e.g. 8hrs) but more work still needs to be done. If that is the case, then wont it be that if the lads pay is increased to 26 an hour, then still the lads will work 8hrs, however, because there is still more work to be done (since the overtime is out of necessity), then your overtime hours are still going to be the same, however, you are now paying 26 for the normal time worked plus 1 and half times of 26 (as opposed to 18). In my view, increasing the lads pay will actually be catastrophic, unless my math's is bad