82
By slondons - / Tuesday 18 January 2011 20:53 / United Kingdom
Add a comment
You must be logged in to be able to post comments!
Create my account Sign in
Top comments
Comments
Reply
  banana_buddy  |  11

Too many negative votes, comment buried. Show the comment

Reply
  kofinater  |  15

No, it's Should HAVE, should've sounds like should of and thats why most people type it that way. Google Chrome's spell check is telling me should've is wrong though . . .

Reply
  mintcar  |  15

Are you guys even familiar with what a contraction is? Contractions such as "could’ve,” “should’ve,” “would’ve,” “might’ve,” and “must’ve,” are usually avoided because they encourage people to believe the proper pronunciations are “should of," which is completely wrong. I typed should'VE because that's what she was trying to aim for when she spelled out " should of. " You are all complete idiots with the exception of maybe one or two. I also don't consider myself a Grammar Nazi, as one would have corrected her whole sentence all together. HERP DERP! 55-you really want me to take advice from someone whose username seems to have been made by a three year old? Shut the fwuck up.

Reply
  pwincessa23  |  15

actually, it was the way someone very loved by me used to pronounce it. it wasn't a three year old, it was a two year old. they may no longer be here but they are still very much loved. at least Im not the one getting anal because someone misspelled something or used something incorrectly. it's a website not a grammar competition. I'm sure people have better things to do than worry about whether they used a contraction right or not. fugly nigga. idc what u say or think. I'm not racist, just dislike you very much.

By  DncrHap  |  26

you know what would've been better? telling them you wouldn't go, and then show up. that way you'd be by yourself in a bar, and you could hook up with some random guy/girl to make yourself feel better. happy birthday!

Loading data…