By luceeloo - 23/11/2016 22:10
By achoo - 27/04/2009 12:52 - United States
By Well then - 10/09/2018 03:30
By Anonymous - 16/02/2011 15:47 - United Kingdom
By nofriends - 27/08/2009 02:28 - United States
By Anonymous - 05/05/2013 15:53 - United States
By tan disaster - 27/02/2009 23:09 - United States
By yourmainman - 28/01/2013 05:03 - Canada
By bookworm - 08/06/2019 14:00
By Anonymous - 04/07/2015 08:55 - United States - Hood River
By Loot - 17/02/2009 00:26 - United States
By clementine8 - 14/02/2009 06:23 - United States
By phant776 - 13/05/2011 04:02 - United States
By B-Man - 11/12/2009 21:55 - Canada
By ashleyramsay - 23/10/2009 19:13 - Canada
By Anonymous - 21/05/2012 01:10 - United States - Saint Louis
By Chris - 02/02/2010 05:40 - France
By screwed - 04/01/2010 05:29 - United States
By Evolution mama - 05/02/2014 19:52 - Iceland - Reykjav
By lulabell - 19/05/2009 02:07 - United States
By Lola - 20/12/2008 12:23 - France
By Why's it so cold in here? - 01/02/2015 18:13 - United States
By Anonymous - 16/07/2009 19:04 - United States
By andrea99 - 03/10/2010 09:35 - United States
By Jim - 09/10/2017 13:00
By amiadori - 01/05/2009 09:50 - United States
By Anonymous - 22/08/2015 06:58 - United States - Cadillac
By deliveryboy - 05/03/2011 15:46 - China
By Anonymous - 30/01/2012 23:45 - United Kingdom
By annoyed - 10/02/2009 03:59 - United States
By MoreThenFriends - 16/08/2018 22:00
By Anonymous - 25/09/2019 02:02
By huulo - 16/11/2010 10:07
By notapedobear - 13/01/2011 08:21
By It's CSI Miami - 24/06/2015 04:16 - United States - San Francisco
By ew - 15/09/2015 16:33 - United States - Las Vegas
By lk mm, n vwls - 11/01/2014 01:20 - United States - Mansfield Depot
By concusion - 23/08/2010 09:03 - United States
By Anonymous - 02/10/2018 17:30
By sucks - 12/03/2009 17:53 - United States
By Anonymous - 02/07/2021 18:01 - South Africa - Bryanston
Add a comment - Reply to : #
I'm calling out your boss for sexism. He wouldn't need your help if his 'superior skills' got him the job. Sorry OP.
That's the only information presented. The female with enough experience/skill/competence to train others got passed over while an untrained/unskilled male was promoted instead. If we had more information, it could be another bias. Maybe the boss and junior guy are the same race, but OP is not. Or junior is secretly the boss's nephew. Or the boss and junior guy are the same religion, but OP is not. Or junior is hotter/younger than OP. Or OP is hotter/younger and the boss considers that "too distracting". They're all equally bad. Any way that you slice it, the person who approved junior's promotion is an asshole.
Sexism exists, deal with it. It comes in many forms and effects all genders. In this case, it is a possibility, so it's not a bad thing to call out that this could be the case for this situation. This guy got a job he had no knowledge of and wasn't qualified for. So why exactly did he get the job? What differences were there between OP and this other guy that made him the better candidate? Because it certainly wasn't for his "superior skills" like the boss said. His new employees wouldn't have to train him if he did indeed possess these "superior skills."
Let's blame sexism or racism cause they are definitely the cause of every single problem in the world. Yeah, sexism is a possibility. But so is the boss simply liking the worker they promoted more. Or OP's new superior just simply lied about their Excel skills and the boss didn't notice it. Every time someone misidentifies sexism as the cause of a problem it makes it harder to believe it is the cause the next time someone claims it. Stop crying wolf unless you can actually see the wolf.
You're calling the boss out for sexism, but do you really know if that's the case? Do you even know if the boss is a man? Maybe her boss just doesn't like her. There are far too many reasons for one person to dislike another, to make that kind of assumption without knowing the people in the situation personally.
You're right. It is a possiblility, and it should be considered. But these people just flat out crying "sexism" are acting like it's the only possibility, without knowing all the details. In my own humble opinion, that's just being narrow minded. Maybe the boss is friends with the new guy. Maybe the boss just doesn't like her because of things that have happened... Who knows. Like I said before, there are too many possibilities to just assume
Unless something akin to nepotism is at work here, I don't see why you can't simply refuse to teach him, and point out to HR that he obviously lied to get the position.
I feel like there's a 90% chance that whoever approved the promotion was fully aware this dude didn't have the right skills to begin with. It's not like 2 strangers applied for a job. The higher ups would already know (based on their daily job duties) that OP uses Excel everyday and the office junior had no experience with it. So the question is not IF the promotion was biased, only WHAT KIND of bias was at play. I agree it's still bullshit and OP should bring it up with HR.
did you read the FML? He obviously is not. Otherwise he wouldn't need to be taught anything regarding Excel, much less the basics... And let's face it, if you were good at excel and applied to a promotion and got denied because of the promotion winner's "superior" excel skills only to have to teach them the skills that supposedly won them the job and lost you it, you'd be fucking pissed as well. There is really no reason to defend the guy... especially if he (obviously) lied to get the promotion and he got away with it to. Unless of course it was one of those mock promotion openings that they allow anyone.to try out for but actually have a certain person in mind. Happens in the government all the fucking time. The root is typically nepotism so I wouldn't be surprised if that was at play in OP'S unfortunate case. :/
The OP can't because it's obvious the guy brought real skills and the Excel thing was just a side skill. Additionally, he may actually have superior excel skills, but could need training on their formatting. The OP here sounds angry that they lost the promotion, and are lashing out.
Obvious? This post has little context, it very well be that they're lashing out but assuming (either way) based upon a 3 paragraph post on a website that one side is wrong or right is poor judgement skills. Either way, if OP felt the need to write on a website over this, again assuming it's legit, the likely hood of it simply being formatting or some company specific way of utilizing excel is not very high. It's true, they could be the sort of person to do that but in that case this would also be a fa/ke af FML. :'D
I bet Trump also has someone teaching him the necessary skills to be president.
Teach him the incorrect way to do it. He can't blame it on you for he is the "expert". Win-win for you. Unless your boss is the real asshole, then nothing may work on your favor.
"Evil" implies either the other guy doesn't deserves it despite lying or that the overall boss doesn't deserve it despite either not checking how they compare or checking but picking the guy anyways even though OP was more qualified. Either way, they deserve it so it's more "*karma-Ing intensifies*."
OP: why dont you just pretend you dont know the answer/s when they ask more related excel questions? Just tell them what you did teach them, is what you know. Why should they get extra pay for a job you could presumably easily do and get free training from you as well, not to mention the fact that it may put you back further in YOUR job tasks?
As someone who comes from an industry where excel is a big part of the job I know many companies see students write they are experts in excel. They know the students exaggerate and are just average. To us it only counts when we say in which way we used excel and give very specific examples or had excel based classes at uni like "financial modeling in excel" etc.. You should question the person saying the guy got the job due to superior excel skills though.