YDI for taking a bet that goes against your values in life. that's just stupid.

That's what I was going to say, 7. If not eating meat is such a big deal to her, she never should have made a bet where there was a possibility that she would have to eat meat.

Too many negative votes, comment buried. Show the comment.

totally, since when dumbfucks become vegetarian? you should be eaten

iwadsan, the OP is a man.

This comment has been moderated.

OH NO! Where is the OP going to get his false sense of superiority now?!?!

(Also #37 way to be sexist and assume it's a she just because he's a vegetarian, it says "man")

first of all big macs have meat. u all should watch food inc. a movie about food production in America. u might understand why he wants to be a vegetarian. but the way to change the world is not by being a vegetarian (its kind of stupid too) you need to find and promote a lifestyle anyone can and might accept. for instance not eating at restaraunts that promote horrific cruelty to animals. not wasting meat. eat less meat, if the nation ate 1% less cow, does anyone know how many cows would be spared? think about it look it up watch the movie "food inc"

This comment has been moderated.

Actually, #97, it's more likely that #37 associated the OP with being female because she is female. I do that too, occasionally. Sometimes I don't check the gender and I read it from a female perspective.

Too many negative votes, comment buried. Show the comment.

dude nobody gives a shit. they taste good

yeh but still what sort of
person bets against there principles.
you deserved it you douche

Agreed with #7--YDI
If eating meat goes against what you believe then why would you bet on that in the first place? YOU did have a choice to accept the bet and I'm sure that if you had tried then you could of changed the stakes for it.

Too many negative votes, comment buried. Show the comment.

One word.... Fatty

I think OP forgot the FML part of this post.. the fact that he probably started having serious stomach trouble afterward if he has not eaten meat in that long.

#102 ~ How many cows could be spared? NONE. They'd just breed less cows, that's all, ultimately decreasing the cow population. Less would be slaughtered, but less would live in the first place.

Bah duh dut dut dyyyyy I'm loving it. McDonald's puts the happy in happy meal : - )

Sure go promote that life-style cause no one has done that already. Maybe people are just tired of preachers (ms). Seriously you don't need to promote anymore

Too many negative votes, comment buried. Show the comment.

That's nothing but one sided propaganda #102. If everyone in the world stopped eating meat, we'd be overrun with a cow infestation problem. You would mess up the balance of life by not killing those animals. In addition, the human population would suffer greatly as there wouldn't be enough food to feed everyone.

As for you OP, YDI. 1) You made a bet that was "against your morals" If you didn't want to do something, you wouldn't have made a bet like that no matter how sure you were that you'd win. 2) You liked it, which means you're nothing but a hypocrite, just like the rest of the hippie wannabe activists.

Yeah, I saw food inc, the other day, and now everytime i see one of my friends eating something i look at them and go, "your eating corn", and they give me the weirdest looks. And to the OP YDI for making a bet that, if you lost, would make the past 8 years of being meat free kinda pointless. Guess you'll have to start over again.

Too many negative votes, comment buried. Show the comment.

Harsh. Apparently the op didn't think it was so stupid. He can do what he wants.

not harsh, the OP is a dumbass

Well obviously the OP isn't a pussy anymore. So i think the FML is the 8 years of being vegan. :-P

Too many negative votes, comment buried. Show the comment.

true dat!! animals eat other animal why shouldent we eat animals too??? after all were animals right???

exactly. Why would you enter the bet and still keep it? ydi. don't complain

Big Mac is Dim Mak !

cuz she was a vegiterrean for eight years...

HE

^^^ This ^^^.

I agree completely with tanaqqash. A person can be opposed to the idea of animal cruelty but that doesn't negate his/her taste for meat. Conversely, there are lots of people who don't like meat and rarely or never eat it, but they don't subscribe to any form of vegetarianism.

No, what's retarded is you judging something as retarded because it doesn't agree with your beliefs. And yes, I know I'm judging that his judgment is retarded based on my belief that his judgment is retarded. And if you understand that then I am happy to lose this argument, because I don't.

I don't think that vegetarianism is retarded, to some extent, however, if they are vegetarians because they think it's cruelty to animals, and they try push and/or discuss that eating an animal is cruel, then I will fuck them up.

I hate PETA more than anything on the Earth.

I agree. PETA should not exist.

hey hey!! there is room for all Gods creatures... right next to the mashed potatoes

You must have some other definition of the word vegan that I was not before aware of.

If McDonalds tasted like crap it wouldn't be the most popular fast food world wide, appealing to people from a vast number of different countries with different cultural food. If you want to jump on the hating McDonalds bandwagon there are probably better reasons than saying something stupid and pretty blatantly untrue about the taste of it.

because it's cheap food. that's it

There's a lot cheaper food.

3 or so dollars may sound cheap but in comparison to how much you'd spend on a non-fast-food meal/homemade meal.. it's not.

Mac donald's IS awful. I don't hate it. I just think people that enjoy it have no culinary education and can love anything that is only sugar and fat. Mac donald's is food for children, and you should have lost your love for it at the same time you lost your first teeth.

Besides, Britney Spears sells a lot of discs. Do you think it is good music ? Gregarious.

I think billions of people would disagree with you considering 75 hamburgers are sold every second of the day, and I'm pretty sure they're NOT all children.

Britney Spears may sell a lot of CD's both the consumers who are purchasing them do it because they like her. Same goes for Mickey D's

Ba da pa pa pa... I'm lovin' it.
;)

Plenty of chefs enjoy the occasional McDonalds meal from time to time. My best friend has been a chef for the last 5 years, and has spent almost as long studying cooking and still has McDonalds at least once a month and enjoys it. It's not cheap in comparison to other foods and yet people from all cultures eat it. And it certainly wouldn't be the majority of people who eat McDonalds who only eat food full of sugar and fat, and there are other foods with far more sugar and fat I doubt you would accuse people who eat it from time to time of only liking foods full of sugar and fat.

What exactly is bad about Britney Spears music? It might not be your taste, but would you care to elaborate on what actually makes her music bad?

In a recent report in The New York times, they stated that obeisety in America is due to cheap foods (from your local fast food producers, mcd's burgerking.. and so on). Not only does this say that the food is cheap but most people eat who eat at these places are spending 1 dollar on a double cheese burger. I don't eat dinner for a dollar. Thus concluding that a bad troll is a bad troll. Britney spears has nothing to do with this. BAD

So because the New York Times says that it's cheap, it's cheap?

McDonalds have franchises in almost every developed country in the world. McDonalds is not the reason Americans are obese. It doesn't really matter what you say the New York Times says. McDonalds is still more expensive than a lot of other food. Most people eat more than 1 cheeseburger for a meal, and you're certainly not going to get obese from that. Homecooked meals often work out to be cheaper than that at any rate, depending on what you cook.

I'll eat most animal, I don't do rodent though.. I'll pass on the miced meat.

what if it was wrapped in bacon?

aw no, I'm muslim...

If I could see your point there, I'd probably agree with you!

Lol, i think what he means is being a veg because of the way the animals are killed is wrong, that he should have a better reason to be a veg, which honestly i can't find.. :)

Loolll. I have vegetarian and vegan friends but I still believe that if God didn't want us to eat meat, there would be vicious teeth on cows and chickens and whatnot.

That would be a good point if god existed.

hahahaha (:

that would be a good point if the circle of life involved keeping chickens and cows in cages/pens so incredibly small that they cannot move.

Yeah. When my cousin was little, all he ever ate was PBJ's and goldfish, and he never wanted to eat anything else, even when his parents tried to force him. They could never get him to eat meat until he was like 8, and by then, his body was rejecting it. He's a doctor now, and he says that if he were to attempt to eat meat, it would fuck him up out of both ends, because your body loses the enzymes meant to break down meats.

glad someone finally caught this. this is totally true. after 8 years you wouldn't "love" the big mac. you would be puking it up for the next six hours.

agreed. i knew someone who was a vegan for two years and he got violently ill from eating an egg.... fake

Killing animals for food or accidentally in the process of harvesting food and animal cruelty are different things. They are probably opposed to the way the animals are treated prior to being killed and the awful way in which they are killed. Yes there are some farms that treat the animals well, but I don't think it's as easy to distinguish which meat is which, unlike eggs.

If you can think of one thing that you would not eat due to its gross out factor, then your argument is lost. I'm thinking roaches, dog, worms, animal testicles, anything at all that you wouldn't eat.

All those things sound rad to me, I'd try it.

Try doing some research before you make a ridiculous comment like that.

what about my comment isn't true?

I've been vegetarian for 20 years; I ate meat recently and it didn't make me sick, so that's what isn't true.

well, congrats on not getting sick, but the majority of people will get sick after eating something they have abstained from. Ask any vegan who has gone back to veg or a vegan/vegetarian who has gone omni, it's not easy.

Perhaps the OP was an exception to the rule like pendatic, but that's doubtful.

pendatic, why would you eat meat after being veg for 20 years?

I was vegan for many years and went back to meat, I didn't get sick. I have several friends who've done the same and have never gotten sick. You don't know what you're talking about.

Actually, she does. As someone mentioned before, your body loses the enzymes needed to process meat. Of course, everyone is different, so it affects people in different ways; some, not at all, others, it makes them really sick. Don't jump on someone just because it didn't happen to you specifically.

Actually, I do know what I'm talking about...I've gone from omni to vegan to veg, so I've had plenty of experience with changing the way I eat. Back_in_action knows what I'm talking about.

They probably don't consider that animal cruelty though, because pesticides kill pests and the animals who have their habitat destroyed are too small to matter. But I totally agree with your point :)

yea if people REALLY care about animal cruelty we all just have to die

Yeah, we're probably at the same level as you people who relish the fact that what you eat has been slaughtered.

Animals that die because you stole thier habitat, as well as the ones that die from pesticides, die a slower, more painful death than slaughter. Congrats on being ignorant.

You must look really odd if you don't have incisors, are you a homeless guy?

I'm aware we have teeth called incisors, but our "incisors" are dull and not made to grind meat unlike the actual incisors of omnivores or carnivores.. and I wasn't aware that homeless people had different dental structures? that was an awful excuse for a joke :/

Incisors aren't meant for grinding. They are meant to cut and shear food. All food. Plus we have canines which are solely meant for ripping and tearing meat into manageable portions.

did you fail the paper?

Most of the comments on these pages are the reason I hate people. Most of them are such fucking morons. My problem is with those who cram their beliefs down others' throats because they generalise about particular groups from the comments of a few.
Thank you for those words of wisdom, achristie9.

Most of the comments on this page are saying how they hate Vegetarians. Come on until this post the Vegetarian/non vegetarian arguments were mostly not spoken, and then I can mainly see people against vegeterian, saying as a meat eater myself, this is simply about a dumb vegetarian who made a idiotic bet and deserves it if she actually went through with it, Not which lifestyle is better, don;t make it that.

Just as many are not slaughtered. Less demand for meat = less animals bred and killed for consumption. The OP isn't trying to cram their beliefs down anyone's throats, and as far as I can see, nor is anyone else asides from people claiming vegetarianism is stupid.

Lions aren't omnivores and don't have other options, and they way the kill their prey isn't as awful as the way a lot of meat work factories kill the animals we eat. Which brings me to another point; kill your own dinner and eat it before you tell anyone else to grow a pair because lions in the wild kill other animals.

lions dont keep a farm load of prey and kill them regardless of whether it needs food or not. We do. A lion kills when it need to eat unlike us who kill animals and in a lot of cases process the hell out of them, most of the meat does get used up but some doesnt meaning some of the animals die in vain.

Im not a vegi and i understand the whole "they would die anyway" argument. All i'm saying is a little bit more respect towards the animals that we eat (which thankfully a lot of farms, slaughterhouses do have) would not go amiss.

To OP what the hell were you thinking, you eat a big mac and your oppossed to animal cruelty? If you are going to make a decision like that at least have the courage to follow it through.

I can't speak for all vegetarians, but I'm aware that on my own, I'm not making a difference. However, I don't have to take part in something I don't feel right about. I try not to be a moral beacon of superiority, because nobody wants to hear "ew, that's dead animal" or anything of the like. That has less to do with vegetarianism and more with being a pretensious douchebag. Hope that helped put it into perspective a bit.

blaaaaaakely, everything you're saying I'm agreeing with one hundred percent. this guy. :)

a lion and a human being have entirely different sets of judgements and if we are to claim to be so civilized and advanced, shouldn't our ethics (namely regarding meat consumption) advance too? To me, it seems a lot of contradicting statements are being offered here.

and in regards to all the people stating that vegetarians disgust them and that we need to 'grow a pair', the lack of rational arguments involved with these posts really prove to me that I've picked the 'right side'. :)

go fuck yourself

Haha, after all those long comments, josh's one made me lol, it's like a punch-line.

put this as a fml

TL;DR

Nice input, thanks for stopping by.

Everything you eat is alive at one point whether it's a tomato or a cow so unless you eat rocks stfu.

I guess you both didn't understand both my post or the terms of service for this website.

"TLDR"
Terms of Service: TXT language and abbreviations are forbidden on the website. Be careful with your spelling and read your post a few times to be sure before posting. Do not hesitate in using an automatic spelling corrector to avoid spelling mistakes.

"Everything you eat is alive at one point whether it's a tomato or a cow so unless you eat rocks stfu"

Terms of Service: Respect and good manners are essential. Don't post any shocking or hateful comments about the other users or the original poster of the FML you are commenting on. Remember that Fmylife is a site open to a wide audience.

As for your point, we are sentient beings that evolved on a diet of other life forms and eating some form of life to live is unavoidable. Maybe you should reread my post, but Veganism is about incorporating other sentient being interests into our own actions and minimizing our impact on them. Is it not enough that we are driving them off land and towards extinction at an incredible pace, couldn't we not also use and treat them as a product or stock?

Too many negative votes, comment buried. Show the comment.

Vegetarianism is the practice of following a plant-based diet including fruits, vegetables, cereal grains, nuts, and seeds, with or without dairy products and eggs. A vegetarian does not eat meat, game, poultry, fish, crustacea, shellfish, or products of animal slaughter such as animal-derived gelatin and rennet.[1][2] There are a number of vegetarian diets. A lacto-vegetarian diet includes dairy products but excludes eggs, an ovo-vegetarian diet includes eggs but not dairy products, and a lacto-ovo vegetarian diet includes both eggs and dairy products. A vegan diet excludes all animal products, including dairy products, eggs, and honey. Vegetarianism may be adopted for ethical, health, environmental, religious, political, cultural, aesthetic, economic, or other reasons.

Semi-vegetarian diets consist largely of vegetarian foods, but may include fish and sometimes poultry, as well as dairy products and eggs. With these diets, the word "meat" is often defined as only mammalian flesh.[3][4] A pescetarian diet, for example, includes "fish but no meat".[5] The colloquial application of the word "vegetarian" to such diets has led vegetarian groups, such as the Vegetarian Society, to clarify that such fish or poultry-based diets are not vegetarian, due to the fact that fish and birds are animals.[6]
Contents
[hide]

* 1 Terminology and varieties of vegetarianism
o 1.1 Other dietary practices commonly associated with vegetarianism
o 1.2 Semi-vegetarian diets
* 2 Etymology
* 3 History
* 4 Health benefits and concerns
o 4.1 Nutrition
+ 4.1.1 Protein
+ 4.1.2 Iron
+ 4.1.3 Vitamin B12
+ 4.1.4 Fatty acids
+ 4.1.5 Calcium
+ 4.1.6 Vitamin D
o 4.2 Longevity
o 4.3 Food safety
o 4.4 Medical use
o 4.5 Physiology
o 4.6 Animal-to-human disease transmissions
o 4.7 Eating disorders
* 5 Additional reasons for a vegetarian diet
o 5.1 Childhood IQ and diet choice
o 5.2 Ethics
o 5.3 Religion
+ 5.3.1 Hinduism
+ 5.3.2 Jainism
+ 5.3.3 Buddhism
+ 5.3.4 Sikhism
+ 5.3.5 Judaism
+ 5.3.6 Classical Greek and Roman Thought
+ 5.3.7 Christianity
+ 5.3.8 Islam
+ 5.3.9 Rastafari
o 5.4 Environmental
o 5.5 Labour conditions
o 5.6 Economical
o 5.7 Psychological
o 5.8 Cultural
* 6 Demographics
o 6.1 Gender
o 6.2 Country-specific information
* 7 See also
* 8 Notes
* 9 References
* 10 External links

[edit] Terminology and varieties of vegetarianism
Foods in the main vegetarian diets. Each of the diets listed in the table are subsets of vegetarianism. Diet name Meat, poultry, fish Eggs Dairy products Honey
Lacto-ovo vegetarianism
No
Yes Yes Yes
Lacto vegetarianism
No
No Yes Yes
Ovo vegetarianism
No
Yes No Yes
Veganism
No
No No No[7][8][9]
[edit] Other dietary practices commonly associated with vegetarianism

* Fruitarianism is a diet of only fruit, nuts, seeds, and other plant matter that can be gathered without harming the plant.
* Su vegetarianism (such as in Buddhism), excludes all animal products as well as vegetables in the allium family (which have the characteristic aroma of onion and garlic): onion, garlic, scallions, leeks, or shallots.
* Macrobiotic diet is a diet of mostly whole grains and beans. Not all macrobiotics are vegetarians, as some consume fish.
* Raw veganism is a diet of fresh and uncooked fruit, nuts, seeds, and vegetables.
* Dietary veganism: whereas vegans do not use animal products of any kind, dietary vegans restrict their veganism to their diet.[10]

Strict vegetarians also avoid products that may use animal ingredients not included in their labels or which use animal products in their manufacturing e.g. cheeses that use animal rennet (enzymes from animal stomach lining), gelatin (from animal skin, bones, and connective tissue), some sugars that are whitened with bone char (e.g. cane sugar, but not beet sugar) and alcohol clarified with gelatin or crushed shellfish and sturgeon.
[edit] Semi-vegetarian diets

Semi-vegetarian diets primarily consist of vegetarian foods, but make exceptions for some non-vegetarian foods. These diets may be followed by those who choose to reduce the amount of animal flesh consumed, as a way of transitioning to a vegetarian diet, or for environmental reasons. The term "semi-vegetarian" is contested by most strict vegetarians,[6] who believe that vegetarianism must exclude all animal-based foods.

Many individuals describe themselves as "vegetarian" while practicing a semi-vegetarian diet that includes fish or poultry.[11]

* Semi-vegetarianism: A diet that excludes certain meats, particularly red meat, but may include others.
* Flexitarianism: A diet that consists primarily of vegetarian food, but includes occasional exceptions.
* Pescetarianism: A diet that is mainly vegetarian but also includes fish.

[edit] Etymology

The Vegetarian Society, founded in 1847, claims to have "created the word vegetarian from the Latin 'vegetus' meaning 'lively' (which is how these early vegetarians claimed their diet made them feel) ..."[12] However, the Oxford English Dictionary and other standard dictionaries state that the word was formed from the term "vegetable" and the suffix "-arian".[13]

The Oxford English Dictionary also gives evidence that the word was already in use before the foundation of the Vegetarian Society:

* 1839 - "If I had had to be my own cook, I should inevitably become a vegetarian." (F. A. Kemble, Jrnl. Residence on Georgian Plantation (1863) 251)
* 1842 - "To tell a healthy vegetarian that his diet is very uncongenial with the wants of his nature." (Healthian, Apr. 34)

but notes that "The general use of the word appears to have been largely due to the formation of the Vegetarian Society at Ramsgate in 1847."
[edit] History
Main article: History of vegetarianism

The earliest records of (lacto) [14] vegetarianism as a concept and practice amongst a significant number of people come from ancient India.[15] Vegetarianism was also practiced by the ancient Greek civilisation in Southern Italy and in Greece in the 6th century BCE.[16] In both instances the diet was closely connected with the idea of nonviolence towards animals (called ahimsa in India) and was promoted by religious groups and philosophers.[nb 1]

Following the Christianisation of the Roman Empire in late antiquity, vegetarianism practically disappeared from Europe.[18] Several orders of monks in medieval Europe restricted or banned the consumption of meat for ascetic reasons, but none of them eschewed fish.[19] Saint Genevieve, the Patron Saint of Paris, is mentioned as having observed a vegetarian diet — but as an act of physical austerity, rather than out of concern for animals.

Vegetarianism re-emerged somewhat in Europe during the Renaissance.[20] It became a more widespread practice in the 19th and 20th centuries.

In 1847, the first Vegetarian Society was founded in England;[21] Germany, the Netherlands and other countries followed. The International Vegetarian Union, a union of the national societies, was founded in 1908. In the Western world, the popularity of vegetarianism grew during the 20th century as a result of nutritional, ethical, and more recently, environmental and economic concerns.
[edit] Health benefits and concerns

Vegetarianism is considered a healthy, viable diet. The American Dietetic Association and the Dietitians of Canada have found a properly planned vegetarian diet to satisfy the nutritional needs for all stages of life, and large-scale studies have shown that "Mortality from ischemic heart disease was 24% lower in vegetarians than in nonvegetarians" [22][23][24] Necessary nutrients, proteins, and amino acids for the body's sustenance can be found in vegetables, grains, nuts, soymilk, eggs and dairy.[25]

Vegetarian diets can aid in keeping body weight under control[26][27] and substantially reduce risks of heart disease and osteoporosis.[28][28][29][29] Non-lean red meat, in particular, has been found to be directly associated with dramatically increased risk of cancers of the esophagus, liver, colon, and the lungs.[30][31] Other studies, in contrast, have shown no significant differences between vegetarians and nonvegetarians in mortality from cerebrovascular disease, stomach cancer, colorectal cancer,breast cancer, or prostate cancer, although the sample of vegetarians was small and included ex-smokers who had switched their diet within the last five years.[32]

The American Dietetic Association and Dietitians of Canada have stated: "Vegetarian diets offer a number of nutritional benefits, including lower levels of saturated fat, cholesterol, and animal protein as well as higher levels of carbohydrates, fibre, magnesium, potassium, folate, and antioxidants such as vitamins C and E and phytochemicals."[24] Vegetarians tend to have lower body mass index, lower levels of cholesterol, lower blood pressure, and less incidence of heart disease, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, renal disease, osteoporosis, dementias such as Alzheimer’s Disease and other disorders.[33]
[edit] Nutrition
Main article: Vegetarian nutrition
A fruit and vegetable stall in Barcelona

Western vegetarian diets are typically high in carotenoids, but relatively low in long-chain n-3 fatty acids and vitamin B12. Vegans can have particularly low intake of vitamin B and calcium if they do not eat enough items such as collard greens, leafy greens, tempeh and tofu (soy). High levels of dietary fibre, folic acid, vitamins C and E, and magnesium, and low consumption of saturated fat are all considered to be beneficial aspects of a vegetarian diet.[34][35]
[edit] Protein

Protein intake in vegetarian diets is only slightly lower than in meat diets and can meet daily requirements for any person, including athletes and bodybuilders.[36] Studies at Harvard University as well as other studies conducted in the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and various European countries, have confirmed that vegetarian diets provide sufficient protein intake as long as a variety of plant sources are available and consumed.[37] Proteins are composed of amino acids, and a common concern with protein acquired from vegetable sources is an adequate intake of the essential amino acids, which cannot be synthesised by the human body. While dairy and egg products provide complete sources for lacto-ovo vegetarians, the only vegetable sources with significant amounts of all eight types of essential amino acids are lupin, soy, hempseed, chia seed, amaranth, buckwheat, and quinoa. It is not necessary, however, to obtain protein from these sources—the essential amino acids can also be obtained by eating a variety of complementary plant sources that, in combination, provide all eight essential amino acids (e.g. brown rice and beans, or hummus and whole wheat pita, though protein combining in the same meal is not necessary). A varied intake of such sources can be adequate, a 1994 study found.[38]
[edit] Iron

Vegetarian diets typically contain similar levels of iron to non-vegetarian diets, but this has lower bioavailability than iron from meat sources, and its absorption can sometimes be inhibited by other dietary constituents. Vegetarian foods rich in iron include black beans, cashews, hempseed, kidney beans, lentils, oatmeal, raisins, black-eyed peas, soybeans, many breakfast cereals, sunflower seeds, chickpeas, tomato juice, tempeh, molasses, thyme, and whole-wheat bread.[39] The related vegan diets can often be higher in iron than vegetarian diets, because dairy products are low in iron.[35] Iron stores often tend to be lower in vegetarians than non-vegetarians and iron deficiency is thus more common in vegetarian and vegan women and children (adult males are rarely iron deficient), however, iron deficiency anaemia is rare no matter the diet.[40][41]
[edit] Vitamin B12

Plants are not generally significant sources of Vitamin B12.[42] However, lacto-ovo vegetarians can obtain B12 from dairy products and eggs, and vegans can obtain it from fortified foods and dietary supplements.[43][44] Since the human body preserves B12 and reuses it without destroying the substance, clinical evidence of B12 deficiency is uncommon.[45][46] The body can preserve stores of the vitamin for up to 30 years without needing its supplies to be replenished.[42]

The only reliable vegan sources of B12 are foods fortified with B12 (including some soy products and some breakfast cereals) and B12 supplements.[47][48] The research on vitamin B12 sources has increased in the latest years.[49]
[edit] Fatty acids

Fish is a non-vegetarian source of Omega 3 fatty acids. Plant-based, or vegetarian, sources exist such as soy, walnuts, pumpkin seeds, canola oil and especially hempseed, chia seed, flaxseed, and purslane. Purslane contains more Omega 3 than any other known leafy green. Plant foods can provide alpha-linolenic acid but not the long-chain n-3 fatty acids EPA and DHA, which are found in low levels in eggs and dairy products. Vegetarians, and particularly vegans, have lower levels of EPA and DHA than meat-eaters. While the health effects of low levels of EPA and DHA are unknown, it is unlikely that supplementation with alpha-linolenic acid will significantly increase levels.[50] Recently, some companies have begun to market vegetarian DHA supplements containing seaweed extracts. Similar supplements providing both DHA and EPA have also begun to appear.[51] Whole seaweeds are not suitable for supplementation because their high iodine content limits the amount that may be safely consumed. However, certain algae such as spirulina are good sources of gamma-linolenic acid (GLA), alpha-linolenic acid (ALA), linoleic acid (LA), stearidonic acid (SDA), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), and arachidonic acid (AA).[52][53]
[edit] Calcium

Calcium intake in vegetarians is similar to non-vegetarians. Some impaired bone mineralisation has been found among vegans who do not consume enough leafy greens, which are sources of abundant calcium.[54] However, this is not found in lacto-ovo vegetarians.[55] Some sources of calcium include broccoli, cauliflower, beet greens, bok choy, collard greens, kale, watercress, and soy beans. Watercress, and kale are especially high in calcium.[56][57] Collard greens are high in calcium, but the calcium is bound to oxalate and therefore it is poorly absorbed.[58]
[edit] Vitamin D

Vitamin D levels do not appear to be lower in vegetarians (although studies have shown that much of the general population is deficient[59]). Vitamin D needs can be met via the human body's own generation upon sufficient and sensible UV sun exposure. Products including milk, soy milk and cereal grains may be fortified to provide a good source of Vitamin D[60] and mushrooms provide over 2700 IU per serving (approx. 3 oz or 1/2 cup) of vitamin D2, if exposed to just 5 minutes of UV light after being harvested;[61] for those who do not get adequate sun exposure and/or food sources, Vitamin D supplementation may be necessary.
[edit] Longevity

A 1999 metastudy[22] combined data from five studies from western countries. The metastudy reported mortality ratios, where lower numbers indicated fewer deaths, for fish eaters to be .82, vegetarians to be .84, occasional meat eaters to be .84. Regular meat eaters and vegans shared the highest mortality ratio of 1.00. The study reported the numbers of deaths in each category, and expected error ranges for each ratio, and adjustments made to the data. However, the "lower mortality was due largely to the relatively low prevalence of smoking in these [vegetarian] cohorts". Out of the major causes of death studied, only one difference in mortality rate was attributed to the difference in diet, as the conclusion states: "vegetarians had a 24% lower mortality from ischemic heart disease than nonvegetarians, but no associations of a vegetarian diet with other major causes of death were established."[22]

In "Mortality in British vegetarians",[23] a similar conclusion is drawn: "British vegetarians have low mortality compared with the general population. Their death rates are similar to those of comparable non-vegetarians, suggesting that much of this benefit may be attributed to non-dietary lifestyle factors such as a low prevalence of smoking and a generally high socio-economic status, or to aspects of the diet other than the avoidance of meat and fish."[62]

The Adventist Health Study is an ongoing study of life expectancy in Seventh-day Adventists. This is the only study among others with similar methodology which had favourable indication for vegetarianism. The researchers found that a combination of different lifestyle choices could influence life expectancy by as much as 10 years. Among the lifestyle choices investigated, a vegetarian diet was estimated to confer an extra 1–1/2 to 2 years of life. The researchers concluded that "the life expectancies of California Adventist men and women are higher than those of any other well-described natural population" at 78.5 years for men and 82.3 years for women. The life expectancy of California Adventists surviving to age 30 was 83.3 years for men and 85.7 years for women.[63]

The Adventist health study is again incorporated into a metastudy titled "Does low meat consumption increase life expectancy in humans?" published in American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, which concluded that low meat eating (less than once per week) and other lifestyle choices significantly increase life expectancy, relative to a group with high meat intake.[64] The study concluded that "The findings from one cohort of healthy adults raises the possibility that long-term (≥ 2 decades) adherence to a vegetarian diet can further produce a significant 3.6-y increase in life expectancy." However, the study also concluded that "Some of the variation in the survival advantage in vegetarians may have been due to marked differences between studies in adjustment for confounders, the definition of vegetarian, measurement error, age distribution, the healthy volunteer effect, and intake of specific plant foods by the vegetarians." It further states that "This raises the possibility that a low-meat, high plant-food dietary pattern may be the true causal protective factor rather than simply elimination of meat from the diet." In a recent review of studies relating low-meat diet patterns to all-cause mortality, Singh noted that "5 out of 5 studies indicated that adults who followed a low meat, high plant-food diet pattern experienced significant or marginally significant decreases in mortality risk relative to other patterns of intake."

Statistical studies, such as comparing life expectancy with regional areas and local diets in Europe also have found life expectancy considerably greater in southern France, where a low meat, high plant Mediterranean diet is common, than northern France, where a diet with high meat content is more common.[65]

A study by the Institute of Preventive and Clinical Medicine, and Institute of Physiological Chemistry looked at a group of 19 vegetarians (lacto-ovo) and used as a comparison a group of 19 omnivorous subjects recruited from the same region. The study found that this group of vegetarians (lacto-ovo) have a significantly higher amount of plasma carboxymethyllysine and advanced glycation endproducts (AGEs) compared to this group of omnivores.[66] Carboxymethyllysine is a glycation product which represents "a general marker of oxidative stress and long-term damage of proteins in aging, atherosclerosis and diabetes." "Advanced glycation end products (AGEs) may play an important adverse role in process of atherosclerosis, diabetes, aging and chronic renal failure."
[edit] Food safety

Libby Sande argued in a blog for USA Today that Vegetarianism reduces E. coli infections,[67] and in a piece for The New York Times linked E. coli contamination in food to industrial scale meat and dairy farms.[68] E. coli infections in the US during 2006 were traced to spinach and onions.[69][dead link][70]

Transmission of pathogenic E. coli often occurs via fecal-oral transmission.[71][72][73] Common routes of transmission include unhygienic food preparation[72] and farm contamination.[74][75][76] Dairy and beef cattle are primary reservoirs of the E. coli strain O157:H7,[77] and they can carry it asymptomatically and shed it in their feces.[77] Food products associated with E. coli outbreaks include raw ground beef,[78] raw seed sprouts or spinach,[74] raw milk, unpasteurized juice, and foods contaminated by infected food workers via fecal-oral route.[72] In 2005, some people who had consumed triple-washed, pre-packaged lettuce were infected with E. coli.[79] In 2007, packaged lettuce salads were recalled after they were found to be contaminated with E. coli.[80] E. coli outbreaks have been traced to unpasteurised apples,[81] orange juice, milk, alfalfa sprouts,[82] and water.[83]

Salmonella outbreaks have been traced to peanut butter, frozen pot pies & puffed vegetable snacks.[84] BSE, also known as mad cow disease, is linked by the World Health Organization to Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease in humans.[85]

There have been reports of fears of foot-and-mouth disease in sheep, PCBs in farmed salmon, mercury in fish, dioxin concentrations in animal products, artificial growth hormones, antibiotics, lead and mercury,[86] pesticide contamination of vegetables and fruits, banned chemicals being used to ripen fruits.[87][88][89] In 2005, fears that "bird flu" could be caused by eating chicken were featured in a PETA call for vegetarian diets.[90]
[edit] Medical use

In Western medicine, patients are sometimes advised to adhere to a vegetarian diet.[91] Certain alternative medicines, such as Ayurveda and Siddha, prescribe a vegetarian diet as a normal procedure.[nb 2]
[edit] Physiology

The Vegetarian Resource Group, among others, has concluded that humans are naturally omnivores based on the human ability to digest meat, as well as plant foods,[93][94] with the correspondent metabolic tendency to an adaptation that makes them need both animal and vegetable nourishment. Other arguments hold that humans are more anatomically similar to herbivores, with long intestinal tracts and blunt teeth, unlike omnivores and carnivores.[citation needed] Nutritional experts believe that early hominids evolved into eating meat as a result of huge climatic changes that took place three to four million years ago, when forests and jungles dried up and became open grasslands and opened hunting and scavenging opportunities.[95][96]
[edit] Animal-to-human disease transmissions
Unbalanced scales.svg
The neutrality of this section is disputed. Please see the discussion on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until the dispute is resolved. (January 2010)

The consumption of meat can cause a transmission of a number of diseases from animals to humans.[97] The connection between infected animal and human illness is well established in the case of salmonella; an estimated one-third to one-half of all chicken meat marketed in the United States is contaminated with salmonella.[97] Only recently, however, have scientists begun to suspect that there is a similar connection between animal meat and human cancer, birth defects, mutations, and many other diseases in humans.[97][98][99][100][101][102][103] In 1975, one study found 75 percent of supermarket samples of cow's milk, and 75 percent of egg samples to contain the leukemia (cancer) virus.[98] By 1985, nearly 100 percent of the eggs tested, or the hens they came from, had the cancer virus.[97][98] The rate of disease among chickens is so high that the Department of Labor has ranked the poultry industry as one of the most hazardous occupations.[97] 20 percent of all cows are afflicted with a variety of cancer known as bovine leukemia virus (BLV).[97] Studies have increasingly linked BLV with HTLV-1, the first human retrovirus discovered to cause cancer.[97] Scientists have found that a bovine immunodeficiency virus (BIV), the equivalent of the AIDS virus in cows, can also infect human cells.[97] It is supposed that BIV may have a role in the development of a number of malignant or slow viruses in humans.[97]

The proximity of animals in industrial-scale animal farming leads to an increased rate of disease transmission. Transmission of animal influenza viruses to humans has been documented, but illness from such cases is rare compared to that caused by the now common human-adapted older influenza viruses,[104] transferred from animals to humans in the more distant past.[nb 3][106][107][108] The first documented case was in 1959, and in 1998, 18 new human cases of H5N1 influenza were diagnosed, in which six people died. In 1997 more cases of H5N1 avian influenza were found in chickens in Hong Kong.[104]

Whether tuberculosis originated in cattle and was then transferred to humans, or diverged from a common ancestor infecting a different species, is currently unclear.[109] The strongest evidence for a domestic-animal origin exists for measles and pertussis, although the data do not exclude a non-domestic origin.[110]

According to the 'Hunter Theory', the "simplest and most plausible explanation for the cross-species transmission" the AIDS virus was transmitted from a chimpanzee to a human when a bushmeat hunter was bitten or cut while hunting or butchering an animal.[111]

Historian Norman Cantor suggests the Black Death might have been a combination of pandemics including a form of anthrax, a cattle murrain. He cites many forms of evidence including the fact that meat from infected cattle was known to have been sold in many rural English areas prior to the onset of the plague.[112]
[edit] Eating disorders

The American Dietetic Association indicates that vegetarian diets may be more common among adolescents with eating disorders but that the evidence suggests that the adoption of a vegetarian diet does not lead to eating disorders, rather that "vegetarian diets may be selected to camouflage an existing eating disorder."[113] Other studies and statements by dietitians and counselors support this conclusion.[nb 4][116]
[edit] Additional reasons for a vegetarian diet
[edit] Childhood IQ and diet choice

A study published in the British Medical Journal in 2007 compared children's IQ at age 10 with their having a vegetarian diet at age 30. The report did not provide information on whether or not the children were already vegetarian at the time when their IQ measurement was taken. It also noted that there was no difference in IQ among those vegetarians who ate only plants, and those who also ate chicken and fish.[117] The BBC summarised part of the results of the study, stating "Men who were vegetarian had an IQ score of 106, compared with 101 for non-vegetarians; while female vegetarians averaged 104, compared with 99 for non-vegetarians."[118] The report concluded that “Higher scores for IQ in childhood are associated with an increased likelihood of being a vegetarian as an adult.”[117] Lead researcher Catharine Gale noted that this link may not be causal, but “may be merely an example of many other lifestyle preferences that might be expected to vary with intelligence.”[118]
[edit] Ethics
Main article: Ethics of vegetarianism

Various ethical reasons have been suggested for choosing vegetarianism.
[edit] Religion
Main article: Vegetarianism and religion
Indian cuisine offers a wide range of vegetarian delicacies because Hinduism, practiced by majority of India's populace, encourages vegetarian diet. Shown here is a vegetarian thali.

Hinduism, Buddhism and Jainism teach vegetarianism as moral conduct. Buddhism in general does not prohibit meat eating, while Mahayana Buddhism encourages vegetarianism as beneficial for developing compassion. Other denominations that advocate a fully vegetarian diet include the Seventh-day Adventists, the Rastafari movement and the Hare Krishnas. Sikhism[119][120][121] does not equate spirituality with diet and does not specify a vegetarian or meat diet.[122]
[edit] Hinduism
Main articles: Vegetarianism in Hinduism and Hindu dietary law
Indian Vegetable Salad containing Lemon, Tomato, Radish, Beetroot, Cucumber and Green Chillies

Most major paths of Hinduism hold vegetarianism as an ideal. There are three main reasons for this: the principle of nonviolence (ahimsa) applied to animals;[123] the intention to offer only "pure" (vegetarian) food to a deity and then to receive it back as prasad;[124] and the conviction that non-vegetarian food is detrimental for the mind and for spiritual development. Hindu vegetarians usually eschew eggs but consume milk and dairy products, so they are lacto-vegetarians.

However, the food habits of Hindus vary according to their community and according to regional traditions. Historically and currently, those Hindus who eat meat prescribe Jhatka meat.[125]
[edit] Jainism
Main article: Jain vegetarianism

Followers of Jainism believe that everything from animals to inanimate objects have life in different degree and they go to great lengths to minimise any harm to it. Most Jains are lacto-vegetarians but more devote Jains do not eat root vegetables because this would involve the killing of plants. Instead they focus on eating beans and fruits, whose cultivation do not involve killing of plants. No products obtained from dead animals are allowed. Jains hold self termination from starvation as the ideal state and some dedicated monks do perform this act of self annihilation. This is for them an indispensable condition for spiritual progress.[126][127] Some particularly dedicated individuals are fruitarians.[128] Honey is forbidden, because its collection is seen as violence against the bees. Some Jains do not consume plant parts that grow underground such as roots and bulbs, because tiny animals may be killed when the plants are pulled up.[129]
[edit] Buddhism
A vegetarian dinner at a Japanese Buddhist temple
Main article: Vegetarianism in Buddhism

Theravadins in general eat meat. If Buddhist monks "see, hear or know" a living animal was killed specifically for them to eat, they must refuse it or else incur an offense. However, this does not include eating meat which was given in alm or commercially purchased. In Theravada cannon, Buddha did not make any comment discouraging them to eat meat (except specific types, such as human, elephant, horse, dog, snake, lion, tiger, leopard, bear, and hyena flesh[130]) but he specifically refuse to institute vegetarianism in his monastic code when a suggestion has been made.

In Mahayana Buddhism, there are several Sanskrit texts where the Buddha instructs his followers to avoid meat. However, each branch of Mahayana Buddhism select what sutra to follow and some branch of Mahayana Buddhism including majority of Tibetan and Japanese Buddhism do eat meat while most of Chinese Buddhism do not eat meat.
[edit] Sikhism
Main article: Vegetarianism in Sikhism

The tenets of Sikhism do not advocate a particular stance on either vegetarianism or the consumption of meat,[131][132][133][134] but rather leave the decision of diet to the individual.[135] The tenth guru, Guru Gobind Singh, however, prohibited "Amritdhari" Sikhs, or those that follow the Sikh Rehat Maryada (the Official Sikh Code of Conduct[136]) from eating Kutha meat, or meat which has been obtained from animals which have been killed in a ritualistic way. This is understood to have been for the political reason of maintaining independence from the then-new Muslim hegemony, as Muslims largely adhere to the ritualistic halal diet.[131][135]

"Amritdharis" that belong to some Sikh sects (eg Akhand Kirtani Jatha, Damdami Taksal, Namdhari,[137] Rarionwalay,[138] etc.) are vehemently against the consumption of meat and eggs (though they do consume and encourage the consumption of milk, butter, and cheese).[139] This vegetarian stance has been traced back to the times of the British Raj, with the advent of many new Vaishnava converts.[135] In response, to the varying views on diet throughout the Sikh population, Sikh Gurus have sought to clarify the Sikh view on diet, stressing their preference only for simplicity of diet. Guru Nanak said that over-consumption of food (Lobh, Greed) involves a drain on the Earth's resources and thus on life.[140][141] Passages from the Guru Granth Sahib (the holy book of Sikhs, also known as the Adi Granth) say that it is "foolish" to argue for the superiority of animal life, because though all life is related, only human life carries more importance.

"Only fools argue whether to eat meat or not. Who can define what is meat and what is not meat? Who knows where the sin lies, being a vegetarian or a non-vegetarian?"[135]

The Sikh langar, or free temple meal, is largely lacto-vegetarian, though this is understood to be a result of efforts to present a meal that is respectful of the diets of any person who would wish to dine, rather than out of dogma.[142][135]
[edit] Judaism

A number of medieval scholars of Jewish religion (e.g. Joseph Albo) regard vegetarianism as a moral ideal, not just because of a concern for the welfare of animals, but because the slaughter of animals might cause the individual who performs such acts to develop negative character traits. Therefore, their concern was with regard to possible harmful effects upon human character rather than with animal welfare. Indeed, Rabbi Joseph Albo maintains that renunciation of the consumption of meat for reasons of concern for animal welfare is not only morally erroneous but even repugnant.[143]

One modern-day scholar who is often cited as in favour of vegetarianism is the late Rabbi Abraham Isaac Kook, the Chief Rabbi of Pre-State Israel. It is indeed the case that in his writings, Rabbi Kook speaks of vegetarianism as an ideal, and points to the fact that Adam did not partake of the flesh of animals. In context, however, Rabbi Kook makes those comments in his portrayal of the eschatological (messianic) era.

According to some Kabbalists, only a mystic, who is able to sense and elevate the reincarnated human souls and "divine sparks", is permitted to consume meat, though eating the flesh of an animal might still cause spiritual damage to the soul. A number of Orthodox Jewish vegetarian groups and activists promote such ideas and believe that the halakhic permission to eat meat is a temporary leniency for those who are not ready yet to accept the vegetarian diet.[144]

Having ties with both ancient Judaism and Christianity, members of the ancient Essene religious group practiced strict vegetarianism sharing a similar belief with the Hindus'/Jains' idea of Ahimsa or "harmlessness".[145]

Translation of the Torah's Ten Commandments state "thou shalt not murder."[146][147] Some people argue that this can also be taken as meaning not to kill at all, animals nor humans, or at least "that one shall not kill unnecessarily," in the same manner that onerous restrictions on slavery in the Bible have been interpreted by modern theologians as to suggest banning the practice.[148] Although it should be noted that the very same Torah also commands people to ritually slaughter animals when killing them, and goes into precise detail on the rituals of animal sacrifices.

While it is neither required nor prohibited for Jews to eat meat, the choice must be made in regard to the ethics and ideals of Judaism"The Vegetarian Mitzvah". http://www.brook.com/jveg.
[edit] Classical Greek and Roman Thought

Ancient Greek philosophy has a long tradition of vegetarianism. Pythagoras was reportedly vegetarian (and studied at Mt. Carmel, where some historians say there was a vegetarian community), as his followers were expected to be. Socrates was reportedly vegetarian, and in his dialogue of what people, or at least Philosopher-rulers, in an ideal republic should eat, he described only vegetarian food. He specified that if meat-eating was allowed, then society would require more doctors.[149]

Roman writer Ovid concluded his magnum opus Metamorphoses, in part, with the impassioned argument (uttered by the character of Pythagoras) that in order for humanity to change, or metamorphose, into a better, more harmonious species, it must strive towards more humane tendencies. He cited vegetarianism as the crucial decision in this metamorphosis, explaining his belief that human life and animal life are so entwined that to kill an animal is virtually the same as killing a fellow human.

Everything changes; nothing dies; the soul roams to and fro, now here, now there, and takes what frame it will, passing from beast to man, from our own form to beast and never dies...Therefore lest appetite and greed destroy the bonds of love and duty, heed my message! Abstain! Never by slaughter dispossess souls that are kin and nourish blood with blood![150]

[edit] Christianity
Main article: Christian vegetarianism

Jesus ordered his apostles to catch and prepare meals with fish[151] and he famously fed 5000 people with five loaves of bread and two fish.[152] Since no other kind of meat is mentioned, and since some of the apostles (and possibly Jesus) may have taken the Nazarite vow, it is surmised that Jesus was a pescetarian.[153]

While vegetarianism is not a common practice in current Christian culture, except by traditional monastics and by other Orthodox at least during 'fast' times,[154] the concept and practice have scriptural and historical support. According to the Bible, in the beginning, humans and animals were vegetarian.(Genesis 1:29–30) Immediately after the Flood, God permitted the eating of meat. (Genesis 9:3)

There is also a strong association between the Quaker tradition within Christianity and vegetarianism dating back at least to the 18th century. The association grew in prominence during the 19th century, coupled with growing Quaker concerns in connection with alcohol consumption, vivisection and social purity. The association between the Quaker tradition and vegetarianism, however, becomes most significant with the founding of the Friends' Vegetarian Society in 1902 "to spread a kindlier way of living amongst the Society of Friends."[155]
[edit] Islam
See also: Islam and animals

Followers of Islam, or Muslims, have the freedom of choice to be vegetarian for medical reasons or if they do not personally like the taste of meat. However, the choice to become vegetarian for non-medical reasons can sometimes be controversial. Though some more traditional Muslims may keep quiet about their vegetarian diet, the number of vegetarian Muslims is increasing.[156]

Vegetarianism has been practiced by some influential Muslims including the Iraqi theologian, female mystic and poet Râbi‘ah al-‘Adawîyah of Basrah, who died in the year 801, and the Sri Lankan sufi master Bawa Muhaiyaddeen who established The Bawa Muhaiyaddeen Fellowship of North America in Philadelphia.[157]

In January 1996, The International Vegetarian Union announced the formation of the Muslim Vegetarian/Vegan Society.[158]

Many omnivore Muslims will select vegetarian options when dining in non-halal restaurants. However, this is a matter of not having the right kind of meat rather than preferring not to eat meat on the whole.[156]
[edit] Rastafari

Within the Afro-Caribbean community, a minority are Rastafarian and follow the dietary regulations with varying degrees of strictness. The most orthodox eat only Ital or natural foods, in which the matching of herbs or spices with vegetables is the result of long and skillfully laid down tradition originating from the African ancestry and cultural heritage of Rastafari.[159] Most Rastafarians are vegetarian. Utensils made from natural material such as stone or earthenware are preferred.
[edit] Environmental
Main article: Environmental vegetarianism

Environmental vegetarianism is based on the concern that the production of meat and animal products for mass consumption, especially through factory farming, is environmentally unsustainable. According to a 2006 United Nations initiative, the livestock industry is one of the largest contributors to environmental degradation worldwide, and modern practices of raising animals for food contributes on a "massive scale" to air and water pollution, land degradation, climate change, and loss of biodiversity. The initiative concluded that "the livestock sector emerges as one of the top two or three most significant contributors to the most serious environmental problems, at every scale from local to global."[160]

In July 2009 Nike and Timberland stopped buying leather from deforested Amazon Rainforest [161] a few weeks after Greenpeace report demonstrated the destruction caused by Amazon cattle ranchers. According to Arnold Newman every hamburger sold results in destruction of 6.25m2 of rain forest.[162]

In addition, animal agriculture is a large source of greenhouse gases and is responsible for 18 percent of the world's greenhouse gas emissions as measured in CO2 equivalents. By comparison, all of the world's transportation (including all cars, trucks, buses, trains, ships, and planes) emits 13.5 percent of the CO2. Animal farming produces 65 percent of human-related nitrous oxide and 37 percent of all human-induced methane. Methane has about 21 times more Global Warming Potential (GWP) than carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide has 296 times the GWP of CO2.[163]

Animals fed on grain, and those that rely on grazing, need far more water than grain crops.[164] According to the USDA, growing the crops necessary to feed farmed animals requires nearly half of the United States' water supply and 80 percent of its agricultural land. Additionally, animals raised for food in the U.S. consume 90 percent of the soy crop, 80 percent of the corn crop, and a total of 70 percent of its grain.[165]

When tracking food animal production from the feed trough to consumption, the inefficiencies of meat, milk and egg production range from 4:1 up to 54:1 energy input to protein output ratio. This firstly because the feed first needs to be grown before it is eaten by the cattle, and secondly because warm-blooded vertebrates need to use a lot of calories just to stay warm (unlike plants or insects).[166] An index which can be used as a measure is the efficiency of conversion of ingested food to body substance, which indicates, for example, that only 10% is converted to body substance by beef cattle, versus 19–31% by silkworms and 44% by German cockroaches.[166] Ecology professor David Pimentel has claimed, "If all the grain currently fed to livestock in the United States were consumed directly by people, the number of people who could be fed would be nearly 800 million."[167] To produce animal based food seems to be, according to these studies, typically much less efficient than the harvesting of grains, vegetables, legumes, seeds and fruits. However, this would not apply to animals that are grazed rather than fed, especially those grazed on land that could not be used for other purposes. Nor would it apply to cultivation of insects for food, which may be more environmentally sustainable than eating food coming from cattle farming.[166] Meat produced in a laboratory (called in vitro meat) may be also more environmentally sustainable than regularly produced meat.[168]

According to the theory of trophic dynamics, it requires 10 times as many crops to feed animals being bred for meat production as it would to feed the same number of people on a vegetarian diet. Currently, 70 percent of all the wheat, corn, and other grain produced is fed to farmed animals.[169] This has led many proponents of vegetarianism to believe that it is ecologically irresponsible to consume meat.[170] Rearing a relatively small number grazing animals is often beneficial, as observed by the Food Climate Research Network at Surrey University, which reports, "A little bit of livestock production is probably a good thing for the environment".[171]
“ The UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) has estimated that direct emissions from meat production account for about 18% of the world's total greenhouse gas emissions. So I want to highlight the fact that among options for mitigating climate change, changing diets is something one should consider. ”

— Rajendra Pachauri,[172] Chairman, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

In May 2009, Ghent was reported to be "the first [city] in the world to go vegetarian at least once a week" for environmental reasons, when local authorities decided to implement a "weekly meatless day". Civil servants would eat vegetarian meals one day per week, in recognition of the United Nations' report. Posters were put up by local authorities to encourage the population to take part on vegetarian days, and "veggie street maps" were printed to highlight vegetarian restaurants. In September 2009, schools in Ghent are due to have a weekly veggiedag ("vegetarian day") too.[173]
[edit] Labour conditions

Some groups, such as PETA, promote vegetarianism as a way to offset poor treatment and working conditions of workers in the contemporary meat industry.[174] These groups cite studies showing the psychological damage caused by working in the meat industry, especially in factory and industrialised settings, and argue that the meat industry violates its labourers' human rights by assigning difficult and distressing tasks without adequate counselling, training and debriefing.[175][176][177][178] However, the working conditions of agricultural workers as a whole, particularly non-permanent workers, remain poor and well below conditions prevailing in other economic sectors.[179] Accidents, including pesticide poisoning, among farmers and plantation workers contribute to increased health risks, including increased mortality.[180] In fact, according to the International Labour Organization, agriculture is one of the three most dangerous jobs in the world.[181]
[edit] Economical

Similar to environmental vegetarianism is the concept of economic vegetarianism. An economic vegetarian is someone who practices vegetarianism from either the philosophical viewpoint concerning issues such as public health and curbing world starvation, the belief that the consumption of meat is economically unsound, part of a conscious simple living strategy or just out of necessity. According to the WorldWatch Institute, "Massive reductions in meat consumption in industrial nations will ease their health care burden while improving public health; declining livestock herds will take pressure off rangelands and grainlands, allowing the agricultural resource base to rejuvenate. As populations grow, lowering meat consumption worldwide will allow more efficient use of declining per capita land and water resources, while at the same time making grain more affordable to the world's chronically hungry."[182]
[edit] Psychological

The "Appeal to nature" logical fallacy invites one to believe that something is good or right because it is natural.[183]

A metaphor has been presented by Douglas Dunn: that if one gives a young child an apple and a live chicken, the child would instinctively play with the chicken and eat the apple, whereas if a cat were presented with the same choices, its natural impulse would be the opposite.[184] Omnivorous and comparatively human-like species such as chimpanzees' offspring may not instinctively kill a prey animal, such as a Senegal Bushbaby, when presented with one and a piece of fruit either.[185] In a similar assertion, vegetarian Scott Adams wrote humorously: "...a live cow makes a lion salivate, whereas a human just wants to say 'moo' and see if the cow responds."[186]

This same non-predatory inter-species interaction can be seen in adult chimpanzees, which have been seen toying with other animals without regarding them as prey and even occasionally socialising with other species.[187]
[edit] Cultural
Taiwanese Buddhist cuisine

People may choose vegetarianism because they were raised in a vegetarian household or because of a vegetarian partner, family member, or friend.

Limited vegetarianism has appeal for some young people in Western societies. A 2007 University of Michigan Medical School experiment on the diffusion of memes included an attempt to encourage limited vegetarianism.
[edit] Demographics
[edit] Gender

A 1992 market research study conducted by the Yankelovich research organisation claimed that "of the 12.4 million people [in the US] who call themselves vegetarian, 68 percent are female while only 32 percent are male."[188]

At least one study indicates that vegetarian women are more likely to have female babies. A study of 6,000 pregnant women in 1998 "found that while the national average in Britain is 106 boys born to every 100 girls, for vegetarian mothers the ratio was just 85 boys to 100 girls."[189] Catherine Collins of the British Dietetic Association has dismissed this as a "statistical fluke".[189]

There is speculation that diets high in soy, due to high isoflavone content, can have a feminising effect on human infants due to their action as phytoestrogens. Proponents of this theory claim that diets high in isoflavones promote earlier onset of female puberty and delayed male puberty.[190] However, a 2001 study conducted by the University of Pennsylvania found no significant differences in the later onset of puberty between infants raised on soy-based formula and cow milk formula.[191]
[edit] Country-specific information
Labeling used in India to distinguish vegetarian products (left) from non-vegetarian ones (right).
Main article: Vegetarianism in specific countries

Vegetarianism is viewed in different ways around the world. In some areas there is cultural and even legal support, but in others the diet is poorly understood or even frowned upon. In many countries food labelling is in place that makes it easier for vegetarians to identify foods compatible with their diets.

In India, which has more vegetarians than the rest of the world combined (399 million as of 2006),[192] not only is there food labelling, but many restaurants are marketed and signed as being either "Vegetarian" or "Non-Vegetarian". People who are vegetarian in India are usually Lacto-vegetarians, and therefore, to cater for this market, the majority of vegetarian restaurants in India do serve dairy products while eschewing egg products. Most Western vegetarian restaurants, in comparison, do serve eggs and egg-based products.
[edit] See also

* Fruitarian
* List of diets
* List of vegetarians
* Meat-free day
* Veganarchism
* Vegetarian cuisine
* Vegetarian Diet Pyramid
* Vegetarian or vegan cat food
* Template:User Vegetarian

I...I think I love you, 203.

No one gives a shit; do something useful with tour time instead of annoying people.

When I say Hilshire You Say Farm! HILSHIRE...FARM....GO MEAT!!!! (haha...sorry i LOVE that commercial...and your MEAT in all caps reminded me of it! )

The milk would go to the source it was intended for- their calves. Do humans produce milk when they haven't given birth? No. Cows don't either. Dairy cows are kept pregnant all of the time and their offspring are either used to produce milk if they're female or are raised for veal if male. It's not as if cows produce this neverending supply of milk and we're doing them a favor by drinking it. Farmers keep cows pregnant, therefore they keep producing milk. That's how it works.

Humans can lactate without giving birth, and indefinitely if they keep feeding. They don't need to be kept pregnant to keep lactating.

True, but they also don't need to keep lactating to be allowed to survive. The average dairy cow lasts 4-5 years before slaughter. Sounds like quite fun life!

Cows produce way More milk than the cav needs...And a cow produces milk for many months after birth. some can even continue to lactate for 18 months. And true dairy farmers are never cruel to thier animals...i have many friends and relatives who are dairy farmers...including my gradnparents...In fact...dariy cows are probablly the most well treated animals on the planet asside from dogs. Each farmer has an entire team of vets and workers assigned to thier cows. We as a country have doen this to ourselves for huminizing animals...we have too many cartoons and such where cows and other animals act as humans. And the Chick-fil-a cows dont help. Ive grown up around it...i would know. I told a friend of mine who happens to own a ranch about some of these things the other day...i thought he was going to die laughing..."the modern world is ignorant of what goes on our farms" READ JAMES HARRIOT PEOPLE ...greatest books ever.

Milk does go to the calves, dairy cows produce more milk then their calves could ever drink, so instead of letting the mother be with the calf and have her produce tons of milk that the calf can't keep up with, and subsquently allow the cow the be in pain from her udder being so full and ultimately get an infection they are milked so that humans can have thier milk.

jj79242 Make sure your text complies with our rules
http://www.fmylife.com/comments/rules

Kind people like you?
Are you pointing out that:

a. You are a kind person
b. All vegetarians are kind
c. Those who aren't vegetarians are not kind

No option d) there Boddmon, but can I phone a friend please?

I'll be your friend, you can phone me ;)

LOL, thanks most kindly, but you set the question so I can't!

That's okay you can call me anyway.
;)

For all the homophones out there reading this.. NEWS FLASH: I'M ONLY KIDDING!

OP is not a vegetable just a vegetarian.

hehe

mmmmmmm humannn..

no. just no. McDonald's burgers are beef. soy costs more than mass produced beef, and the ingredients are listed as beef. Its simply more cost effective to use beef than soy. Not to mention the potential law suits from using soy and calling it 100% beef would be devastating. Get your facts straight or at least use your brain before opening your mouth.

Although I won't get too deep into debate about this since this website isn't for that, I will say that every little bit can help. It's not about the animals, necessarily, it can be about health or the environment. Any nutrients and vitamins most people need can come from many sources other than meat. But the biggest issue I see vegetarian helping is the environmental one. We use countless more resources to raise and produce meat than we do to grow crops. It's just economically sound to be a vegetarian or vegan.

Don't get me wrong, I can understand vegetarianism/veganism and am not against them or anything. I'm questioning more of why people who are vegetarian for moral reasons choose to not eat meat, but eat eggs/milk/butter/anything coming from an animal that isn't meat instead of the other way around. I wonder if it were better to not support the animals they abuse and keep alive (for milk/eggs/butter/etc) than the animals they abuse and kill (meat).
Does that make sense?

I like how you mention the difference in resources used. That's a good point, I never thought about that. :D

Right? It's like someone dumped a bucket of raw meat on this thread -.-