You soo deserve it, you ignorant bi-ya-tch

Too many negative votes, comment buried. Show the comment.

omgomgomgomgomg

I so totally knew when i was clicking this FML that some witty fml poster would come up with something as clever as...

YDI for having an "online boyfriend"

FYL









O and this is officialy the THIRD comment viewable on this FML.....


Someone tell me im wrong?





Thankyou

Too many negative votes, comment buried. Show the comment.

This is my favorite FML ever.

EVER.

You must be ugly

sexual harassment... PANDA!

LOL Was gonna start singing that famous song by Loverboy "PIG AND ELEPHANT DNA JUST WON'T SPLICE!"

YES! DO THIS! That would be freaking sweet.

Tarynkd^^^THIS!

1) You don't EVER trust anyone you meet online, at least not without looking into their background and making sure they really are who they say they are. I don't care if the relationship is platonic (friendship) or romantic (lover), you don't just go around believing everything a person says to you!
2) How can a guy be your boyfriend if you've only talked online? That's just unbelievably immature, and considering that you're only a year away from adulthood, one would THINK you'd have a bit more common sense than that. First you start with friendship and casual conversation. Then, IF YOU'RE A MATURE AND RESPONSIBLE ADULT, you can arrange to talk over the phone, and eventually meet up (in a safe and public place) after getting to know each other and verifying certain facts. But you're not an adult. You're a crazy little kid from Cali. And do you know what that means? That means that YOU DON'T START FORMING "RELATIONSHIPS" WITH PEOPLE YOU MEET ON THE INTERNET.
3) Didn't your Mommy and Daddy teach you to never give out your personal information to strangers? Such as your PHONE NUMBER?
4) I'm wondering how old you told him YOU were. Knowing how girls like you act online, I'll hazard a guess that you didn't tell him YOUR real age either.
5) Let's face it. There's usually only one thing a 58 year old man wants from an underage girl: cybersex. He gets you to flash your tits and puss all over the internet, talk dirty to him a few nights a week, and he promises you his undying love, that you'll always be together, that he'll take care of you, blah blah blah. Well, now your vagina is plastered all over the internet, you have no self-respect left, AND you've probably broken up a marriage. Nice going.

YDI. Next time try keeping your cyber-coot in your cyber-panties.

I've heard e-peen but never cyber-coot. Makes sense really. I like.

Um...it was online. She'd never met him, apparently. She didn't know he was fifty-eight, and it couldn't have gotten physical, since they'd never met in person.

Too many negative votes, comment buried. Show the comment.

and that makes the fact that she was having an online 'relationship'-if you can call it that, which I don't- ok? These weird people don't need to meet you, they don't need you to GIVE them your address, they just need dumb young girls. O.o

Erm...
Where in my post did you read that I thought it was okay?
Kindly don't put words in my mouth, thanks.

Well from the way you said "they had never met"....as if the fact that they hadn't met-yet- meant that it wouldn't get physical...

It just came across as "kids it's ok to talk to strangers on the internet and refer to them as your "boyfriend" as long as you don't meet them". and that's really not true .. these people are weird, they have ways of tricking information out of you. Plus, if OP trusted him enough to be calling him her "boyfriend", it was probably only a matter of time before they did meet up.

The point is-it's a bad idea to talk to strangers, because they COULD be 58. Not knowing that they are lying won't save you...avoiding speaking to them will

The post I was replying to was completely inaccurate. He thought the OP had met the guy and knew he was 58. I was just correcting him.

If it makes you feel any better I understood what you meant at first. How it wouldn't get physical just simple because they haven't met. I think it was as simple as that. Some people feel the need to continue to argue over a computer, instead of just saying, "Oh, that makes sense." to make themselves feel better.

Haha, thanks, Hennessy! :]

Agreed. My boyfriend and I met through a forum we were both members of. But we started out as friends and then went from there...we didn't even discuss the whole boyfriend/girlfriend thing until after we'd known each other for a while and met several times. I don't even understand how a girl can call someone her boyfriend if all she does is talk to him online (and possibly "show him things" online, as current whore-culture dictates). I just..don't get it.

It must be a teen thing. -___-

I think most people would be thankful your not their parent. At 17 I'm pretty sure she's old enough to be on the computer and I don't think most parents would be overly upset at their kid loving someone for their personality alone.

She did not love him just for his personality, this is not a romance novel. He was a 58 year old married man with two children who lied to a teenage girl because he's perverted. Seriously. If you want to get it on with a 58 year old man online then you have fun with that but good parents wouldn't want their kids being so stupid and irresponsible.

On the other hand, most parents would be upset to find out that their 17 year old daughter was camwhoring for a 58 year old man, one whom she called her "boyfriend" even when he simply thinks of her as some hot online vagina.
Who ever said love was involved? Most likely, she thought of him as her "boyfriend" and he thought of her as his "bit of fun on the side". Girls can be stupid like that, especially when they have no self-esteem and start talking to random men online.

Tary - They only knew each other online. They weren't "getting it on". All you know from the OP is that she talked to him online. Anything else is complete assumption, so it's ridiculous to say she wasn't in love with him for his personality. It's all you know she knew about him. Personality does not = age.

mf_yf - Who ever said cam whoring was involved? Certainly not the OP. All I'm saying is you can't make assumptions and all you know is that she talked to him and hadn't met him. It's more likely she loved the person she thought she was talking to for their conversations and his personality.

If you're saying I shouldn't make assumptions, don't make any yourself. Jesus Christ...hypocrisy much? You're ASSUMING this teenage girl has an emotional depth rivaling that of a kiddie pool in the drought season...which is pretty uncommon for teenage girls these days.
So how about we each have our own assumptions, yes? Okay then. :D

I hate people who say age doesn't matter or it's just a number. Um no. Age fucking matters. If a girl is 12 and a guy is 34 it matters. The girl was 17 and the guy was 58. She called him her boyfriend. That's not okay. You're trying to make yourself out to be this super mature person but by saying in this case she loved him for his personality when she didn't even know him (so you can guess he lied about other things as well) that just makes you look childish. A MATURE person knows you shouldn't date people you've never met and doesn't give out ANY type of information online, like their phone number. Because they KNOW better. If he lied about being married, his age, and having kids how could she like him for his personality? He made someone up who wasn't actually him. She believed something a stranger told her on the internet. That is not mature. Being mature includes having common sense and listening to logic and reason rather then your hormone riddled teenage emotions (and I'm a teen too so I have those emotions but I know enough not to trust people on the internet)

mf_yf - I'm not making assumptions. I've only said it's just as likely it was a relationship based on personality rather than cam whoring, like your comments assume she was. Perhaps you should have worked harder on your reading comprehension in school instead of camwhoring online if you think this is the norm for teenage girls. Unless you're only thinking this is the norm so you could tell yourself you were an oh so special and unique little snowflake?

Ahhh, your arrogance, Twinklestar, amuses me greatly. No, I wasn't a camwhore back in my teenage years. I just know that in the culture we live in today, young girls are taught through songs and television that sex is what will get them the most attention. So a great many teenager girls equate sex with positive attention, and some equate positive sexual attention with love.
I'm simply being realistic. So I'll thank you to take a big sharp pin to that ASTOUNDING ego of yours, okay? Thanks, darling!

Your profile says 21. Your "teenage years" were hardly any different. It's not arrogance to point out you're reading comprehension is failing you if you can't understand that I haven't made any assumptions here.

You've assumed that the girl remained sweet, innocent, and chaste while speaking to this man. You've assumed that they have an emotional connection to each other. And you've assumed that I am somehow inferior to you because of the assumptions I hold, making you not only a hypocrite, but an arrogant one at that.
Great job making yourself look like a jackass. GREAT job!

No. I simply said you don't know that she didn't and that your assumptions are baseless. Go away and work on your reading comprehension.

At any rate, I just took a look at your profile, and you're only a grand two years older than I. So if you're going to reference my teenage years, for any good it might do you, you might as well be talking about your own.


Anyways, you've started to bore me with your holier-than thou drivel and poorly-framed and thinly-veiled insults, so I'm gong to go laugh at some other FMLs and let you rant on and on and on like the arrogant twat you truly are.

Your assumptions are also baseless. We've both extrapolated and formed opinions based on what little information the original post provides. OH MY GARSH, that means that you and I are in the same boat!!!
Have fun with your hypocrisy.

I can only imagine what HIS FML would read like...
Probably something along the lines of "Today, I found out that the hot, 120 pound, 5'8", 28 year old woman I've been talking to online is really an ugly, 250 pound, 5'1", 17 year old girl. Also, my wife called the little bitch and now wants a divorce. FML."

You, my friend, myfriend_youfail, not do fail, because that was awesome! ;)

If he had the extra space, he could have written, "I had felt bad that I told her I was 55 and informally separated."

Then she called my wife to let her kno that I am the father of he baby, I swear I never touched the bitch!

I say it's a YDI simply because she swallowed all the lies he threw at her and because she revealed personal information to someone she met on the internet. Go watch Dateline NBC's "To Catch a Predator". That sort of thing actually happened to a girl in my home state recently. She started talking to some guy she found on the internet, and she gave him her phone number. After talking on the phone for a while, they agreed to meet up in a public park in her area. Once they met up, he dragged her off to a deserted area and raped her.
In today's culture, people often confuse sex with love. Most online "relationships", especially those involving underage individuals, often involve nude or otherwise inappropriate pictures being pasted all over the Internet. So not only is there the risk of being physically and sexually assaulted of he gets his hands on any personal information, there's also the chance of having some VERY shameful pictures left up on the internet for everyone in the world to view.
Kids shouldn't be "dating" people online. Period. I don't care how nice and safe the person on the other end of the interwebs seems, it's not an activity that emotionally undeveloped children should be participating in.
Though really, I could also blame the OP's parents for this one. Parents should teach their children Internet safety.

Actually, calling someone you only know on the internet your boyfriend and 'loving them' is not more mature, or mature at all. It's extremely childish and immature. I would rather date someone because I think they're cute and have it be shallow then try to justify falling in love with someone you've never met face to face and act like I'm so much better because I'm putting my life at risk. To add to horror stories involving this type of thing, there was this 13 year old girl who had started talking to a guy who said he was 17 online. She gave him her phone number and they would talk on the phone when the girl's dad wasn't around because she knew he would make her stop. She gave the 'boy' her address, and he came to her house, kidnapped her, raped her, took her to a storage facility type place, and shot her then himself, killing both of them. He was actually a 50-something year old man. That wasn't mature of her, it was a mistake. You shouldn't do stuff like that when you're so young.

You don't know what he told her, and for all you know he only lied about was his age and marital status. Those aren't difficult things to lie about. Also, you have no idea if she gave him too much personal information. All he had was her phone number and most people's facebook or myspace pages have more dangerous personal information on them than a phone number. At 17 she's hardly still a kid. A lot of 17 year old's here are living on their own and at university. Sure, there are plenty of horror stories of people who abuse the internet like this guy was obviously doing, but there are a lot more where people just have genuine relationships based on falling for the other persons personality online, and no one in this thread knows which case is true for the OP, just like you don't know whether or not they exchanged any photo's. You've probably spent too much time in dodgy chatrooms if you think this is the only kind of interaction people have with each other in online relationships. It's not her fault he lied, and the people saying nothing more than "online bf=ydi" are being a bit ridiculous and judgmental without enough information to be.

In this technological era, a phone number is enough to find out a person's entire name and address for about $10. That dangerous enough for you?

As I posted earlier, I DID meet my current boyfriend online. But we were both mature and emotionally capable ADULTS. This is an underage girl and a much older adult. Can ya see the difference there???

And if you'd actually read the entire thread, you'd know that I have several reasons for thinking this girl is an idiot. Lern2Eengrish. Thanks.

Tary - Saying it's not mature without giving a reason doesn't actually make it true. If you think it's preferable to date people for shallow reasons and not just their personality that's entirely up to you, but just because that's your preference doesn't mean it should be anyone else's or that it's more mature. She didn't put her life in danger. He had her phone number. As I said above, most people have more dangerous information that could allow anyone on the internet to find them on their facebook or myspaces (full name and school or workplace is plenty to find someone irl if you really want to, but you can't do much with a phone number). Yes, there are plenty of internet horror stories. But there are also far more of people who met irl. Just like there are far more internet relationships that work out and where neither of the people lie to each other. Perhaps you should think your opinions through a little more before judging others and repeating the same lines you hear everyone else saying without giving any reasoning behind them.

Cell phone numbers don't require an address and name to register and therefor can't be traced like that. It's also entirely free to get far more information on someone who simply has a myspace page or a website (when you register a domain name in most cases your making your full name and address easily accessible to anyone aware of your webpage to find in about 20 seconds).

And underage for what? She's certainly not underage for using the internet. Or for having a bf. These are the only things you know about her. In most countries, 16 is the legal age for sex and many students are already living away from home and at university at this age so saying she shouldn't have because she's a "kid" is a bit ridiculous.

It's not a thread, it's a comments section and not wanting to read all your boring comments doesn't mean I need to "L2eengrish".

*facedesk*
A phone number isn't enough to find a person? *repeated facedesk*

Okay, let me make this simple for you. Google "reverse search telephone directory (cell numbers included)". Click any given website that fits those parameters. Enter your phone number. A free result will yield the city, state/province, and country the number is located in, based on public records. A small fee will then give you the specific address, and often the name of the account holder.
This is useful in finding restaurants and places of business.
But since most websites do not only limit the search to business numbers, it is also QUITE handy for finding out where any given person lives.

"Underage" in this case, means "someone who is not yet legally an adult". And an underage individual getting involved with a married overage individual may, based on the evidence, constitute an emotional affair. If she EVER sent him inappropriate pictures or "talked dirty" with him, criminal charges of sexual misconduct may be applied. Additional charges may or may not be brought against the overage individual if his wife decides to take him to court for divorce.

As for our "boring comments", I suggest you read them before making sweeping generalizations about them, so you don't end up looking like a fool who didn't read before speaking.

Both replies are below. Sigh.

But it pays so well!

I just looked at your profile pic and I want to give you my credit card number right now! ;)

Old dudes don't know how to use MySpace!

Hahahaha!

Again with your holier-than-thou attitude. My oh my, I haven't seen an ego this size since I left my mother's house and stopped looking at my brother's smug face on a daily basis. Get over yourself.

What I stated was based on the assumption that the owner of the phone provided their name and address. I didn't think it necessary to say "if you didn't give out that information, it wouldn't be available", because I don't like to state the obvious.

So again, if you're quite finished acting like you shit gold and piss holy water, let's get back to the actual FML.

Your "assumption she provided her name and address"... My point was, don't make ridiculous and baseless assumptions. Most people don't and chances are she didn't, so to assume she did is just stupid. And don't really care about your issues with your family aye, so wanna keep your life story out of this?

I'll only keep my family out of it if you pretty please deflate your ego a bit. ;) Bitch.