49
By car trouble / Friday 14 October 2016 08:12 / New Zealand
Add a comment
You must be logged in to be able to post comments!
Create my account Sign in
Top comments

A 3 min walk would be a 1 min drive as opposed to 90 min walk. So maybe he was too lazy to drive that far? Regardless, that's really sad and frustrating.

Comments
Reply

Too many negative votes, comment buried. Show the comment

A 3 min walk would be a 1 min drive as opposed to 90 min walk. So maybe he was too lazy to drive that far? Regardless, that's really sad and frustrating.

Reply

It takes 90 minutes to walk to my school from my house but it only takes 5 minutes to drive to my school. It could not have been that far.

Reply

#17, are you walking through tall corn mazes and thick mud? On what earth does a 90 minute walk, which I'm assuming would be on the same roads you take that 5 minute drive in, turn into a 5 minute walk? Even with zero cars on the road, it should be at least 15, or you're over exaggerating the walking time.

Reply

#19, that's a bit harsh. My school is 5 miles away so it takes about 5 minutes to get there, but walking would take almost an hour.

Reply

Think about it in terms of speed. If you walk 2 mph and someone drives 30 mph, then they're going 15x faster. That means it takes then roughly 6℅ of the time make the trip.

Reply

#19 You're assuming a lot. My school was 5 miles away, which was an 8 min drive and a 90 min walk. When you drive you can use the freeway, when you walk you have to do so on the side roads.

Reply

Except that making a kid walk for an hour and a half is bullshit. The average person walks about five MPH from what I've observed- that's a seven mile walk, roughly. And OP wasn't planning, or have any reason to expect to have to, walk that distance. Meaning they very likely had no water, no sunscreen, and that if anything had happened to them, it very likely would have taken HOURS for the father to even notice they were missing, and it would slow down search efforts because they'd have to check

Reply

Too many negative votes, comment buried. Show the comment

Too many negative votes, comment buried. Show the comment

are you the older sibling, OP? there's sort of a double standard with younger siblings, parents will go out of their way to help the younger one and in this case leave the older one to walk.

While it does suck for you, I think this all depends on how old your sister is. Even if her friend's house is a 3 minute walk away, if she's aged 4-6, I can understand why your dad would go get her, because we live in a time where young children can easily get kidnapped if they're seen outside alone.

Reply

I dont know why but i know that this comment will get thumbed down, i totally agree that her age is important in this situation

Reply

Maybe because the dad could have easily picked OP up and VERY easily been home with time to spare before picking up the younger sibling? Thus, it wasn't a matter of having to choose who to pick up, but the dad being either a jerk or an idiot.

Reply

And, during OP's hour and a half walk home, what if she had been kidnapped by someone? Or what if she was raped? Or murdered? Anything could have happened to OP, too.

Reply

True, anything can happen to anyone, but I can imagine that children are more vulnerable to those sort of things when they're alone in public, which I guess depends on where they live specifically.

Reply

The point is that it wasn't a matter of having to choose who to pick up. He endangered OP- who, having walked a longer path, alone, was in MORE danger because he didn't feel like picking them up. And then picked up their younger sibling when he easily could have picked them both up.

Loading data…