77
By ramis182 / Tuesday 27 March 2012 00:17 / United States - Federal Way
Add a comment
You must be logged in to be able to post comments!
Create my account Sign in
Top comments
Comments
Reply
  rotflqtms_  |  7

Or maybe OP doesn't like walking in public with a bouncer uniform on to attract unnecessary attention. Some people change at work because they don't feel like (if he takes public transportation) riding a bus suited up in a bouncer uniform...

Reply
  brownkity  |  3

Yeah, I'd hate walking outside in my work uniform & Something happens & people look to me like, "hey, you're a bouncer, isn't it your job to stop fights?" Thy stop fights because They're paid to stop them. Why get in unnecessary scuffles if you don't need to? Dangerous Or what if some drunk decides to just stabs them because they hate some bouncer who didn't let them into a club the night before, & I have a target on him/her saying, "Hey, look! I'm the reason you can't get into clubs! Haha!" I have been attacked by crazies because of my job before, so I don't advertise what I do anymore. It's just not worth it.

Reply
  brownkity  |  3

*they* not thy. "He/she", not I I had everything in first person, & tried to edit it to make the top part in third person, but missed a couple...and ran out of editing time.

Reply
  marinus_fml  |  19

#25, You're actually right, speaking to a violent person is the best way to calm the situation. Even the marines that caught Osama merely spoke to him, he listened and obeyed every command. Also, most of the battles that were ever fought in world war two, saw opposing nations verbally settle the argument across the trenches by yelling at each other across land-mine torn fields.

Reply
  Vash_41288  |  10

@30 I agree sometimes talking is just not an available option unless you're a spy trained in the art of conversational manipulation even then a fight is unavoidable

Reply
  Awahso  |  25

Less than lethal force. Better then cops swinging their batons and breaking bones right? While it may kill every now and then, 99% it is quick, effective, and non lethal.

Reply
  bwhahaha_fml  |  10

50 I bet if your relative was in the 1% your view would change drastically. Judging from what op said the cops were in danger at no time therefore use of tasers was not needed.

Reply
  desireev  |  17

I know!... That's too bad! I watt to be able to help him! Ways to help him are just buzzing through my brain.. But I'm still waiting for my lightbulb to flicker on! He should definitely switch into his uniform next time though! :)

Loading data…