104
By ZG_Rules - / Friday 20 March 2015 14:38 / Netherlands - Wageningen
Add a comment
You must be logged in to be able to post comments!
Create my account Sign in
Top comments
By  TheBookWyrm  |  26

Who cares? Publish it. Scientific advancement is more important than a job, and if you can disprove theories made by older and more experienced scientists, I'm sure you could find work elsewhere. Props for doing that, by the way.

By  Joshwarrior  |  45

Publish it, discredit him, and take his job. I understand that respect is important, but you will make a name for yourself if you do, and regret it if you don't. #1 beat me to it haha but plus why would you want to continue working for such an Asshole?

Comments
By  TheBookWyrm  |  26

Who cares? Publish it. Scientific advancement is more important than a job, and if you can disprove theories made by older and more experienced scientists, I'm sure you could find work elsewhere. Props for doing that, by the way.

Reply
  ElizaWy  |  26

Well... quite a few people probably care, actually. The scientific community is fraught with politics... to the point where if you disprove popular theories (or theories that may have provided you funding) you could be black-balled from the profession altogether.

Reply
  heftysmash253  |  26

Easy to say that when it's not your job on the line. Yes, scientific advancement is important, but so is having a job to support yourself. It is possible he could get some sort of reward for this new theory, but it could be a hit or miss.

Reply
  Enslaved  |  26

The scientific community is bias towards good evidence, reality and have very strict standards that can withstand peer reviews as an acceptable science. If one could overturn (or disprove) a popular scientific theory, they would earn Noble prizes and huge grants.

Reply
  tantanpanda  |  26

if you get your journals and credible theories published, you'd get many job openings. if you become well known for it and you get fired all of the sudden, people will wonder.

Reply
  migmit  |  26

True, but if you can tolerate working with a douchebag who doesn't appreciate being proven wrong and pulls rank on you instead, you are not a real scientist.

Reply
  devildog562  |  26

If you do decide to publish It, you had better make damn sure your data is repeatable and correct. You may want to sit on it for a little bit and discuss it with him and perhaps his superior .

Reply
  ZG_Rules  |  26

OP here, I am already working on getting my research published but that can take a while. The problem is that the research team I am working for has been built around this theory and we are probably going to lose our funding now. Well, time go looking for another project I guess. Still, although my boss is not happy, his boss will write me a letter of recommendation so I will be alright.

By  Joshwarrior  |  45

Publish it, discredit him, and take his job. I understand that respect is important, but you will make a name for yourself if you do, and regret it if you don't. #1 beat me to it haha but plus why would you want to continue working for such an Asshole?

Reply
  Voij  |  45

All things considered, it might just be that the supervisor is trying to get OP involved in the project, then publish the discreditation himself and shove all responsibility of failure off to OP. It'd probably be the easiest way for the supervisor to save his ass... and he even has OP as the perfect scapegoat.

By  garf3265  |  25

Too many negative votes, comment buried. Show the comment

By  briang959  |  51

If you publish it, just be warned that your supervisor may try and take credit. It's a slipper slope but there are ways to protect yourself. Make sure your supervisor doesn't try to steal your work and publish ahead of you.

Loading data…