117
By not_trained_for_this - / Wednesday 18 November 2009 06:05 / United States
Add a comment
You must be logged in to be able to post comments!
Create my account Sign in
Top comments
By  RufusCade  |  7

"Hello, Mrs Doe! This is the principal at John's school. We had to cut his pants again since he couldn't unzip them himself..." "/.../" "No, you are well aware of that we are allowed to touch the children's hips, but not the behind or front." "/.../" "Yes, we used scissors." "/.../" "No, we didn't hurt him with the scissors as we accidentally did the last time." "/.../" "If you say so, Mrs. Doe, we can let him spend the day in his peed pants, but I want that in writing from you and your husband." I really think that the fear of pedophiles has taken monstrouous proportions. Why not tdress the kids up in Burqa to protect them from peeping?

Comments
Reply
  DameGreyWulf  |  0

Well, Robin, though not proper, it's easier to type "it" than "he/she" or "(s)he." Not trying to dehumanize, as it is a gender-neutral term, just being lazy. Anyway... OP, you should have just done it. Poor kid.

By  vapors  |  0

I'd rather say its the kids FML. I bet you laugh about it, sadistic bastard! Mo-ahahaha!

Reply
  lace_belmort  |  1

It's the parents' fault for sending the kid to school in pants he can't take off on his own. Let him go home in the pee-soaked pants and maybe they'll learn their lesson.

Reply

It's not his fault, so he shouldn't be punished just so the parents buy him different pants. Although they should find him different pants. Anyone make elastic only pants for kids he could wear?

Reply
  ThUrSdAy13th  |  0

Comment moderated or buried due to negative votes. Show the comment

Reply

OK, so you say she should have helped him. Then what? The school is slapped with a lawsuit from the kid's parents claiming that that OP touched their child inappropriately. The OP would be fired and never allowed to teach again, and be labeled as a pedophile. The kid's family, meanwhile, would take millions of local tax dollars for themselves and live in luxury. It seems like these ordinances are partly due to overprotective parents, and partly due to the hope that, with so many rules in place, SOMEONE will mess up and the "victim" will strike it rich. Yeah, it's a stupid ordinance. OP would do better to fight it by letting the kid's parents deal with a piss-covered child than by changing his pants. Make the voters hate the ordinance, don't make them think "oh, good thing that pedophile was caught!"

Reply
  Sun_Kissed18  |  25

And have the kid go home and say "I PEED MY PANTS AND MRS. SMITH HELPED ME WITH MY ZIPPER" "She did what?" "She touched my pee pee because I asked her to help me!"??? Can you say lawsuit?

Reply
  TheDog6  |  23

When I first read this I thought they kid zipped IT while he was zipping his pants and then urinated while crying in pain. You guys made it a heck of a clearer.

By  RufusCade  |  7

"Hello, Mrs Doe! This is the principal at John's school. We had to cut his pants again since he couldn't unzip them himself..." "/.../" "No, you are well aware of that we are allowed to touch the children's hips, but not the behind or front." "/.../" "Yes, we used scissors." "/.../" "No, we didn't hurt him with the scissors as we accidentally did the last time." "/.../" "If you say so, Mrs. Doe, we can let him spend the day in his peed pants, but I want that in writing from you and your husband." I really think that the fear of pedophiles has taken monstrouous proportions. Why not tdress the kids up in Burqa to protect them from peeping?

Reply
  ShockwaveXIII  |  8

^ Promise me you'll never have kids...

By  perdix  |  29

Don't worry, you didn't fall for that old trick. I used to do it again and again at school to get the pretty teachers to touch my dick. (That's before all those "policies" showed up. Damn policies!) They said I had to stop because it was no longer cute. . . In my junior year. . . Of college.

By  febag  |  0

Comment moderated or buried due to negative votes. Show the comment

Similar
Loading data…