why is it that the parents walk in at the worst moment possible? And people, leaving a three-year-old alone in the living room for 30 seconds generally doesn't lead to the child passing out on the floor. Everybody leaves small children unsupervised for short periods of time. Relax. This was just very, very bad luck.

Anybody screaming about "OMG!! How could you leave a baby all alone" or whatever OBVIOUSLY has no knowledge of kids. A 3 year old is walking, talking, able to climb up or down on chairs, sit in a bathtub....basically, a kid that age needs to be monitored, but not watched like a frickin' hawk. It's perfectly reasonable to leave the kid in the living room while you go to their bedroom to find pajamas. I have two kids of my own (4 and 1), who often play in the living room while I'm in another room, but always within ear shot, and always able to check in on them. And they will both find a way to make a mess of the most mess-proof foods (you wouldn't believe what a 1 year old can do with dry Fruit Loops).

If the kid spilled jello on his TOP, why did you have to remove all his clothes? I mean, even if his pajama pants were also spilled on, was removing his underwear truly necessary?

Wrong order, get new clothes before taking off the old ones so the kid isn't alone and naked. FML anyway.

this is why i would never babysit

"now my name and photo are on a special web-site" haha.

#23 i absolutely agree. Its easy to say in hindsight "you should have been watching him!" but please. This boy is 3 years old. As for the PJs, I know many 3 year olds that wear 1 piece pjs which you have to remove entirely. fml? fyl..

LOL that is just simply hilarious!

ya, i know before finishing this story, then the parents walk in.......

uhm even if the kid was wearing one piece pjs, kids usually wear underwear. so there shouldn't have been a reason for him being naked.