115
Add a comment
You must be logged in to be able to post comments!
Create my account Sign in
Top comments
Comments
Reply

too bad you're not in Louisiana. Napoleonic code states that if a tree falls on a house, it's the homeowner's responsibility; regardless if its the neighbor's tree or not. I know from experience.

Reply

aww, i thought selena was going to say something funnier. xD just tell them there were some, afterwinds.? hahaha, you got this. :D

Reply

it's funny because you were trying to prevent the tree from falling on your house but it fell on your neighbors and you got sued

Reply

Legonut, shut up, you are not cool. And we don't need to know that "it's funny because". Don't act like a little kid. And why the hell is this in love?

Reply

25- would that still apply considering OP actually had an influence over wherethe tree fell, intentionally or not?

Reply

YDI for deciding to clear up some storm damage. You carefully cut a tree that was threatening to fall on your house. It fell on your neighbor's house instead. He's taking you to court for damages.

Reply

53 - I guess it's not applicable if you directly influence the fall of the tree. it'll be for the courts to decide. OP is screwed

Reply

no you don't, 43. you hire a contractor to do it, so if the tree falls on your neighbours house, the contractor gets taken to court, and not you

Reply

27 just stated that she's that one bitch at the lunch table who argues about picking something up because she "didn't do it"

Reply

well duh either pay for the damages or make a claim on your homeowners insurance. no need to get sued over it dummy.

Reply

ydi for a botched diy. dont they have professionals to do that sort of thing? next time call them.

Too many negative votes, comment buried. Show the comment

Reply

8 - because nature tends to make precise cuts when taking trees down. I'm sure insurance companies won't investigate that or anything.

Reply

Here you're liable if a tree on your property falls and causes damage to another person's property, regardless if it fell of its own volition or not.

Too many negative votes, comment buried. Show the comment

Reply

It is not really obvious that you were actually kidding. Some people are serious when they say something like that.. Can't blame her for not noticing. - peace -

Reply

I agree with George Bush, even though he's snacking on a kitty kat. Silly Dubya, that's a kitty kat, not a Kit Kat

Reply

I thought that was funny. Some people just don't understand sarcasm. If you lay it on thick enough it should be clear even through the Internet... Sorry if I upset anyone...

Loading data…