94
By usmcgirl - / Wednesday 18 November 2009 03:18 / United States
Add a comment
You must be logged in to be able to post comments!
Create my account Sign in
Top comments
Comments
Reply

#29, the statement while not stating specifically that they were related, implied that they probably where and then said the situation was nasty, thus confirming that #9 thinks the two might be family. It's the same trick the media pulls, they imply without saying and then attack based on an implication, but they're justified because nobody made any ACTUAL accusations. That is why #14 felt the need to argue.

Reply
  mj2123  |  0

It's....a chicken? I think you mean "foul." And plenty of people have flowergirls who are the children of friends of the family - or from the other side of the family (i.e. could have been the bride's relative).

By  ny1996  |  0

your dad owns, you are owned. your dad owns your world now. you have been owned.

Loading data…