I'm saying it is morally right to have sex with those you love. I'm not saying those people are bad who don't but I think it says a lot about our society when we call people with traditional morals "narrow-minded". Really unfortunate really. You disagree with me correct?

Just.. lol.

Intelligence on the Internet. So rare.

im only basing it off of first hand accounts of the effects of promiscuous sex. I simply feel people have not really thought about the very real possibilities sex can bring and it's detriment. I know good people who don't have relationships with those they have sex with and I know they are good people I just don't believe they have considered all possibilities. That being said I'm not entirely sure I consider them to be "inferior" and no I certainly do not intend to be a "troll".

So believing in something you don't makes me the "dumb bastard" but you resorting to calling names? If your criteria makes me hypocritical then you are as well. Today, I had an argument with an asshole incapable of an intelligent conversation. FML

176 - Pretty sure she did whoop your ass in this discussion. Go back up and read. She resorted to calling you names because you are a dumb bastard and couldn't comprehend her point.

Yeah I did read it and if you read carefully I addressed the points and I even said I don't find anyone inferior. What I find so interesting is how your considered a "dumb bastard" for not agreeing with someone. If I remember correctly my initial discussion was stating that sex should be done with those you love. Let me clarify that I did not ever call anyone inferior and frankly I didn't realize my point was about winning or losing. Apparently that means im open to personal attacks. The maturity is the true hypocrisy here.

Boomer I see what your saying. Kay has built quite a fan base, but not everyone of them actually know what's going on. Even the most uneducated person can simply agree with a stranger without actually understanding their logic, or lack thereof. You weren't implying double standards at all. While you basically stated (in my own words) that you believe that sex should be shared between two intimate lovers, you never said that you would judge someone who has sex with no attachment. And you're right, it doesn't make them inferior, it's their choice. Kay is reading it all wrong and throwing intimidating accusations your way, ignoring you when you maturely proved the fact that she misunderstood. Those who agreed with Kay obviously got lost in her confusing word combinations, also known as sentences (had to clarify for the sake of her followers, bless their hearts). As far as I'm concerned her level of intelligence dropped when she sunk low enough to resort to name calling.

Thank you very much. I'm glad that was clarified. I apologize to anyone who believed I was accusing anyone of inferiority. I was really only bothered that alternate view points appeared to be an excuse to excoriate others as being outdated because they have culturally traditional views.

Well I calmly explained I'm sorry for the misunderstanding yet you continue to argue which proves that your neither mature or reasonable. You have demonstrated that you are simply argumentative even when there is no longer an argument. I've read and enjoyed your posts in the past and I'm very disappointed that despite your intelligence, you are so egotistical. Since you are still apparently stuck on this debate, you should know that at this point the name calling and unwillingness to stop has destroyed the validity of your beliefs regardless if you are right or wrong. Stating ones opinion is not self-serving but fighting with someone who has no intention to fight back just for the sake of conflict is below even your level.

279 - "Since you are still apparently stuck on this debate, you should know that at this point the name calling and unwillingness to stop has destroyed the validity of your beliefs regardless if you are right or wrong." Um, pardon me if I'm interrupting your thought process, but you're doing the very thing you're complaining about. You're still stuck on this 'debate', AND you're unwilling to stop since you keep replying. I'm sorry your so butt-hurt, but if you've apologized and whatnot, why carry it on? Why are you still going on about this if it's 'over', according to you? The fact you haven't stopped, once again stated by you, destroys the validity of your argument.

Excuse me I'm no longer saying I'm right or wrong in regards to my original post and I'm discussing Kays disrespectful nature when responding to peoples comments. Therefore there is no longer a debate. Perhaps you should read the content of my comments instead of skimming it for your needs.

To answer your second question I am replying for the same reason you felt the need to get involved. If anything, the fact that you felt the need to post a less than constructive comment along the lines of saying I got my assed whooped tells me that you have taken offense to something I said. Ironically if I'm "butt-hurt" it's because of the "stupidity" brought about by the backlash of my original post which you claim to dislike. You are a walking contradictory. That being said I AM willing to end this conversation if you are. Your response to my comments would prove the hypocrisy of your last comment.

285 - Perhaps you should not assume I didn't read the whole thing. While I agree that sometimes Kay's comments are a little harsh, most of the time they are deserved (such as in this case).

Sorry, my time ran out while I attempted to edit my comment. I felt the need to get involved to help you better understand the situation. Apparently that didn't work... Also, I added my two cents giving you insight as to why Kay said what she said. While it's not really constructive, it helps in some way and does pertain to your comment. It wasn't pointless. I haven't taken offense to anything you said; rather, it's quite the opposite. I'm not sure where you got that idea, but you really need to stop assuming. It literally won't get you anywhere. The only stupidity in this thread is seen in your posts. That's it, that's all. Sorry to offend. The only reason I'm responding now is to once more attempt to reason with you and allow you to see what's really going on. Since that didn't work, I am asking myself why I'm here. I've got better things to do than sit around laughing at your comments, despite the fact they are ridiculous. I will be back sometime tonight and for your sake, I hope you've a) taken the stick out of your ass and b) realized it's pointless to continue whining.

Well considering I'm not whining nor do I have a "stick up my ass" i'm a little unsure what your post meant. You apparently still fail to realize that my argument is over and I'm currently trying to understand what your problem is. Since you have blindly gotten involved and won't even read an entire comment it goes to show your intellectual debate skills are in need of improvement. First rule of debate is to be respectful and listen to anothers point of view which you have not. The very fact i'm forced to assume your point shows that you have a less than fully developed points or proper communication skills. Considering i've already apologized to anyone who took my post in the wrong way, it would seem counterproductive to continue trying to fight and "assume" I'm whining or "butt-hurt" or that I require further disrespectful comments on your part. As you can see I would rather the conversation end here but I also believe you will reply as to ensure me that your not through trying to create immature conflict and argue a point that i'm no longer debating. As far as I can tell i've still done nothing wrong and the fact that you feel a need to become part of this thread supports my theory that you simply like conflict. Up to this point your responses suggest nothing less.

well considering my point was completely relevant to the story I find it hard to believe that's trolling. In addition you have apparently also neglected to read my comment which clearly states that I am in no way disregarding your opinion but I believe that if your as intelligent as you and even I hope, YOU would be open to other beliefs but your not and go as far as labeling me as a troll because of it. You, Kay, have showed your true colors but being unable to be civil. I in the other hand have stated numerous times that I am. Your frustration towards me because of my refusal to speak to you like an adolescent is really quite astonishing. Since you do not understand civility your disrespectful comments are also unconstructive. Thus this would now make YOU a troll.

Well I would like to thank you for proving my last message by not even attempting to challenge my points. How dare I oppose the beliefs of Kay right? Since you have failed to debunk my points regarding your lack of respectful etiquette, it would appear that I've had the last word for quite some time now. I must agree my original post may have seemed harsh and despite the fact that my original post was calmly and respectfully explained and I even apologized, it's not enough for Kay. To receive respect give respect Kay, and judging on your disrespect I'm very convinced you are only given respect on your "witty" comments. That being said your responses just seem to show how unreasonable and egotistical you are. I thank you genuinely for expressing your ignorance, your disrespect, and confrontational nature. It took great effort and courage I'm sure. I look foward to your predictable "your a dumb bastard", "your a troll", "give up now" response that shows how ignorant you are and how problematic your communication skills are. Until then I suggest you ask the nearest adolescent how you should proceed with your next "innovative" personal insult to shift the attention away from your inability to have a decent civil conversation.

290 - Wait, so now you're assuming I can't read, nor have I read an entire comment? I wouldn't be responding if I hadn't. I respond to things of value, and since most parts of your comments are unimportant, I see no use in responding to that particular area and wasting more of the precious FML forum space. In case you didn't notice, I did respond to your comments, having read them and all, and simply ignored the unimportant parts. I'm not going to lie, this time I did skim your comment (290) since it was a pointless, worthless piece of crap. I took into account everything you said and I don't see how any of it makes sense. Unfortunately, you're complaining I'm not taking into account what you said when in reality you're doing the same thing you're complaining about. Just because I don't agree with you doesn't mean I haven't considered or read what you said, moron. Anyway, there are no points Kay (or I) need to refer to or respond to since you're blowing shit out of your mouth. Do you even know the definition of whining? You're whining about shit a) no one cares about and b) that doesn't even need to be whined about. Honestly, you're a sore loser if this is the way you act upon losing a debate, which ended what - a day ago now? About ten posts ago? Just let it go. If you think I'm a moron in your illogical little head, that's fine by me. Go ahead and think that. If you think Kay's the same, fine by me. I don't think it bothers her either. But we're going to have our opinions about you too, and that's just something you're going to have to deal with. Just a little side note: If you want to excel at debating or arguing, consider the other side and accept opinions even if you don't agree with them.

Oh wait! Skimming led me to one more thing. "Since you have failed to debunk my points..." Uh, they were refuted and debunked within one or two posts. Why go back to it if it's already done? Apologies for the long rant ^.

It's odd that your still too ignorant to respond to a post without name calling. Your so unintelligent that I apologized for a misunderstanding yet your still taking my opinion personally. Ma'am I would appreciate dropping the subject especially because you can either not read or because you having reading comprehension problems. Again I would like to mention again that because I apologized and my point was adressed with civility, it should be noted I'm simply discussing the etiquette on this forum which you may lack even more than Kay. Why you ASSUME your so wise and intelligent is beyond me when you can not even read. You are the most ignorant person in this thread and frankly your not even the person I'm I was debating. Show off your ignorance to people who are impressed. While your at it learn reading comprehension. I'm sure I'm on deaf ears since you have demonstrated past difficulties of reading or comprehending. Your ignorance is glaring even for FML.

By the way you debunked nothing. You simply said my ass was whooped. You can not even conduct a debate without looking foolish. I was "debunked" because you disagreed. Hard to debunk my belief in traditional values. It's just how i preceive morality. Proving me wrong is like proving a culture wrong. Its not easy to accomplish. Im not calling you wrong either nor do did I call you inferior so your wasted emotion somewhere else. Do not be sorry for the rant but rather apologize for the unreasonable nature of your posts and the disrespect. You won't because your immaturity doesn't permit it.

Why should I reiterate what Kay said to debunk your original comment if it had already been said? You moron. Please, for the love of god, think. In saying Kay 'whooped your ass' as I believe I put it, I was agreeing with her and what she had said. Why should I have to retype what she said just to get the point across if everyone else on here can understand that's what I was agreeing with? I'm more intelligent than you are; I can guarantee that. How am I taking anything personally? Did I whine like you're still doing, saying "Oh woe is me, this Boomer kid's upsetting me and I don't know what to do about it wahwahwah..."? Nope. I'm sorry you're mistaking my amusement for "upset". It was already suggested to you to drop the subject yet you've kept going for another full day. Any particular reason you're telling us to do what you were already told to do? I'm not ignoring your apology; I did see it when it was posted. I'm placing no value on it because you've continued to argue this far. It's very obvious you're not "sorry" for wasting our time. I would apologize if I had been in the wrong. Unfortunately you're too dumb to realize you were in the wrong. How many posts on this thread alone have told you just that, and you still don't get it? Yes, I agree, I am harsh. That doesn't make me a moron and I only display ignorance to those who show it first. Kindly stop posting as you're wasting your own time (assuming you have other things to do), my time, Kay's time and the FML community's space.

@Boomer21: This entire thread is a waste of space, but if all you will do is attack other users and ignore their real comments, it really is trolling. This is stupid, so please everyone stop now.

If you knew how to read you would know ive been referring to your ETIQUETTE for like the past 10 comments. Since you still fail to comment with respect you admit your immaturity. Do you realize I've lost interest in my original post? By the way telling me that I got my ass whooped isn't bunking genius. The very fact that you apparently have no idea what this argument is about now proves your lack of intelligence. Every post is "moron this" and "idiot that". If name calling is what you do for amusement then you have issues. Intelligent people dont have to name call like a 5 year old. Try more formal schooling and maybe stop being arrogant and stop assuming your smart. Just TRY to comprehend. WE AREN'T TALKING ABOUT MY ORIGINAL POST. IT WAS ALREADY CALMLY EXPLAINED SO IT'S OVER. Just stop arguing for the sake of arguing. We are arguing the fact that your acting like a Cuntish Bitch.

I'm the one attacking people yet they are the ones calling people names after an apology. Please quote my attack because I'm incredibly interested.

I shop a walmart all the time. Your comment was grotesquely offensive, not to mention judgmental and moronic. There is nothing embarrassing about shopping at walmart. However, some of the less fortunate men and women might not be your cup of tea, but they are still human. Get over yourself, you're so blatantly judgmental. Where did you find the balls to make such a statement when your potbelly is so large that you haven't seen your balls in ages?