By notinflammable - 27/06/2009 04:41 - United States
By notinflammable - 27/06/2009 04:41 - United States
By FMLFMLFMLFML - 29/05/2009 17:52 - United States
By ilovesocks - 20/01/2010 06:17 - United States
By pmek - 26/03/2012 09:11 - Australia - Collingwood
By Anonymous - 16/07/2024 05:00 - United States - Bakersfield
By nnniii - 16/11/2015 04:55 - United States - Seattle
By SpiderMan - 12/03/2009 00:23 - United States
By blocked_by_fire - 17/04/2012 18:13 - United States - Pullman
By batsu - 27/01/2012 06:48 - Canada
By Colton - 20/12/2011 02:29 - United States
By BubbaYoshi117 - 07/01/2020 20:00 - United States - Kirkland
YDI. I don't really believe the semen all over the room thing though, how much can you jack out anyway?
First off maybe #231 needs to help you too. Not inflammable is definitely not a double negative since the prefix in- is not negative. Here, let me simplify it for you: not inflammable = not flammable. Okay? Also, everyone who keeps stating the flammable and inflammable is the same and that the guy is a moron, first off, get another synonym for moron, and secondly, WE UNDERSTAND THAT FLAMMABLE AND INFLAMMABLE IS THE SAME THING. By the way, I hope #231 is proud of me. Oh, and you spell inflammable, well inflammable, not inflamable. Thank you.
Inflammable means that the gases an object produces can catch fire. Idiot.
it was the sock that was on fire not the semen
Keywords
why on earth did you think this was a good idea in the first place?
You know that "flammable" and "inflammable" mean the same thing right? Inflammable things catch fire???