Today, I had to give a presentation about Adolf Hitler. I wanted to point out that he was a good speaker, and could incite passion in a crowd. Instead, what came out was, "Hitler's oral skills made everyone go wild with excitement." FML
Hitler was brilliant. He was an evil evil man but he was brilliant. An idiot wouldn't have been able to get the same support. He was able to take over a good part of Europe because he was a brilliant military strategist. In fact one of the reasons that America was able to win the war was because he started taking drugs for Parkinson (I think that's what disease he had) and they ****** with his mind and became reckless. He was terrible though so don't flip out at me.
You assume that double meaning isn't true.
So did your oral skills titillate the student body?