Seems reasonable

By Anonymous - 04/04/2026 03:00 - United States

Today, my husband kicked me out because I told him I'm having an abortion. He just doesn't understand that with the way our country is right now, and how bad the economy is, it's just not a good idea to have kids at the present time. FML
I agree, your life sucks 313
You deserved it 433

Same thing different taste

Top comments

Lots of comments in this section blaming the OP for deciding not to subject a child to a recession instead of condemning the rich elites causing this stress on a global scale. Friendly reminder that protection is not 100% infallible, and that people in the middle ages had as many kids as possible because there was a good chance they would not survive infancy and that if they did, they were to be an extra farmhand, not exactly the picture of great parenthood.

Contraceptives are not perfect, and nor are the people using it. And men have been known to sabotage the birth control to baby-trap their wives/girlfriends. And it won't be a baby until it's born.

Comments

Comment moderated for rule-breaking.

Show it anyway

Having a child is beyond a lifetime commitment. Political cycles and economic cycles come and go. If kids don't fit into your life right now, then yeah, maybe not have kids, but the condition of the world and the nature of the country shouldn't affect your decision.

There will always be reasons not to have kids. Life will never be perfect, If you didnt want kids you should have used protection. Not waited to get pregnant so you could virtue signal to get an abortion.

Right! "Oh, I am SO sensitive and wonderful that I would rather kill a tiny baby than allow that baby a ...maybe...not perfect life in a civilized country." OP is a miserable puke and should have used ******* the reliable birth control that is available these day. Virtue signalers are so gross.

Contraceptives are not perfect, and nor are the people using it. And men have been known to sabotage the birth control to baby-trap their wives/girlfriends. And it won't be a baby until it's born.

If people had babies all through the middle ages, you can't claim that now the "Economy is so bad." WTF is wrong with you.

Lots of comments in this section blaming the OP for deciding not to subject a child to a recession instead of condemning the rich elites causing this stress on a global scale. Friendly reminder that protection is not 100% infallible, and that people in the middle ages had as many kids as possible because there was a good chance they would not survive infancy and that if they did, they were to be an extra farmhand, not exactly the picture of great parenthood.