97
By Anonymous - / Tuesday 29 September 2009 17:29 / Australia
Add a comment
You must be logged in to be able to post comments!
Create my account Sign in
Top comments
Comments
Reply
  crayfish  |  5

he was making a point saying that if you read it the way the op wrote it, then it meant that the cop was driving without a license. Obviously he meant that it was his girlfriend, but he was pointing out the error.

Reply
  kukopia  |  6

Dumbest reply ever. It's ovbious that she's dumb, so dumb she drove a car w/o a lics right in front of a cop. Ie., dumb enough for him to coerce her into doing 'things'. Duhhhh Now he's got 28 days worth of new 'reasons' for her to do 'things' for him.

Reply
  Bumlove89  |  6

Well if the OP dumps her, you should definitely grab her since dumb girls are obviously your style. Im sure you two would make brilliant babies.

By  lem0n_fml  |  7

I don't see how that's immature. I mean. Yeah, maybe since she didn't have her license, and yeah, she must've done something else the OP didn't mention in order for a cop to be in the equation at all, but since when does trying to confuse someone make you immature?

Loading data…