By BobbyHutchinson - 20/10/2009 15:57 - Australia
Add a comment - Reply to : #
Lack of your fingerprints on the knife should show that you're innocent. I mean, it sucks. But at least they won't be lasting charges. :)
Even if the mugger claims he whiped the fingerprints off, there's still a little thing called "innocent untill proven guilty". All the guy has to do is give his side of the story and it'd be his word against yours, and since he's the accuser, he has to provide evidence of your guilt other than the obvious "I say he did it". The mugger has to PROVE that he did it.
Actually, you're the ones who have failed to recognize satire. The OP was saying "themself" and "their" to refer to a singular subject. I was making fun of his poor English by first joking about people getting confused between Austria and Australia, and then suggesting he was running away from a woman. 38 = selfpwned, moron 65 = selfpwned, moron 68 = selfpwned, moron 71 = selfpwned, moron
i never get why some people put YDI. There is no way that this person deserves it. So yeah. FYL.
1) This is prbly fake 2) Why are you even worried? Your fingerprints aren't on the knife, so they can't prove anything.
The part of his life that's fucked is that someone chased him with a knife, trying to rob him, the guy fell, and told the police that OP did it. Not only is OP dealing with the shock of almost being mugged and possibly seriously injured, but then there's the questioning and waiting....