By Awkward - 04/12/2013 22:29 - United States - Redmond
By Tonya - 28/06/2009 03:01 - United States
By jend - 23/05/2009 20:20 - United States
By Furi - 28/05/2021 11:01
By Anonymous - 07/11/2009 16:24 - United States
By joe1234 - 17/07/2009 02:28 - United States
By taylor_b22 - 13/09/2021 11:01
By Anonymoose - 08/09/2015 19:12 - United States - West Long Branch
By Anonymous - 21/11/2010 23:14 - United States
By poohanne - 12/01/2013 06:36 - United States - Ville Platte
By paulinapo - 28/03/2013 13:52 - United States - Staten Island
By Anonymous - 16/05/2020 05:00
By Anonymous - 26/05/2020 05:00
By Chandra - 12/05/2019 10:00 - Canada - Brampton
By satanworshipper - 18/10/2012 04:58 - United States - Hollywood
By Anonymous - 03/05/2013 15:00 - United States
By wetandhungry - 06/10/2016 13:11 - United States - Houston
By Noname - 21/02/2009 07:34 - United States
By Anonymous - 20/08/2014 21:03 - Canada - Toronto
By goodbye sweet internet - 06/07/2013 18:23 - Greece - Athens
By peetime - 24/07/2021 02:01 - United States
By it's v - 17/03/2018 08:00 - United States - Denver
By E.B. - 27/06/2014 00:07 - United States - Grenada
By fail - 05/12/2010 06:35 - United States
By Anonymous - 26/08/2019 12:01 - United Kingdom - London
By Anonymous - 13/08/2019 20:00
By qwertyasdfghzxcv - 11/02/2009 22:05 - Canada
By SummerGirl0009 - 23/08/2009 22:24 - United States
By in love with an idiot - 20/11/2016 11:47 - Angola - Luanda
By Anonymous - 20/11/2014 20:15 - United States - San Francisco
By Julia - 04/10/2011 03:22 - United States
By Anonymous - 29/12/2018 12:00
By RIPLife - 24/03/2016 14:03 - Switzerland - Carouge
By gentileman - 16/03/2009 17:11 - United States
By Anonymous - 21/07/2019 16:15
By Anonymous - 22/10/2021 11:00
By Anonymous - 30/11/2010 15:23 - United States
By Anonymous - 25/12/2010 07:08 - United States
By deflated - 09/08/2009 16:54 - Ireland
By Anonymous - 27/09/2010 15:51 - United Kingdom
By immature - 18/09/2014 19:20 - United Kingdom - Reading
Add a comment - Reply to : #
Actually no, he would still have to take it down. There are rules that you have to follow when doing things like putting up a fence and stuff. Plus the fact is any random kid could not realise what it is and get badly hurt, and it would fall on the neighbour's shoulders. And I..I can't really see what a five year old could do that would be so bad to warrant that. OP should keep a better eye on their kid anyways.
so if you had a five year old son who was electrocuted by touching (not climbing, not pushing, Touching) a fence, you would say: "its his own damn fault!" no, no you wouldn't, you would blame the man who put up the fence, because through his actions your son came to harm. plus electrocution isn't common, it is entirely likely that your five year old wouldn't know the ramifications of touching it. and yes, i realize that the kid shouldn't be unattended, but you cant watch them at all times. having a fence is fine, in fact it is a good idea, but having a electric fence is dangerous and stupid. please, think before you go blaming five year olds for getting hurt by something they most likely don't understand
yes, I have, and they do "hurt", admittedly not badly but it is still painful. also I assume you are fully grown, in witch case you have no ground to stand on, as the person most at risk is FIVE. to elaborate, electricity has less of an effect on you the older,and subsequently larger, you are so at five it will be much more hazardous. I doubt the child will be seriously injured, but all the same the fence should not be electric, a fence alone will do just as well
"so if you had a five year old son who was electrocuted by touching (not climbing, not pushing, Touching) a fence, you would say: "its his own damn fault!"" No, you would say 'It's my fault'. "you would blame the man who put up the fence, because through his actions your son came to harm" No, you not watching your kid is what caused him 'harm' "it is entirely likely that your five year old wouldn't know the ramifications of touching it" That's why parents exist. To teach them not to touch things they shouldn't. "but you cant watch them at all times." It's a five year old OUTSIDE. Yes, you very much SHOULD be watching them at ALL times when outside at that age. That mild shocking fence could just as easily be fucking car. I hope if you ever decide to have kids, you stop and rethink your perspective on blaming the world any time they get hurt rather than watching them and educating them.
5 - I don't think we know enough to know if it's overkill or not. If OP has repeatedly been asked to keep their offspring out of the neighbor's yard because they're doing damage of some kind, I don't see this as overkill at all. Court/lawsuits can't be everyone's first stop in conflict resolution.
That's unfortunate. I'd keep my son well away from it if I was you.
My neighbors had a six year old girl. She crawled in through our dog door, got into our backyard, and ripped up $300 worth of flowers. We had security cameras up from the last owners, and when we caught them the mother played it off as "oh, she is just a child." We were putting in a pool, so by law we had to get a fence. We decided just to keep everyone out by getting a six foot fence with a huge lock on it. The mother had the nerve to complain that her daughter now had nowhere else to run around on because we had blocked off our property and she was not doing damage to her mother's yard. Then asked to use it.
I think her exact words were, somewhere along the lines of, "I think this is just so rude of you to do. Where is my daughter supposed to run around now? She needs space or she starts to damage property." Then she wanted to know when would be a good time to bring her daughter over to use the pool. Mind you, there is a part literally a block from her house. She was just too lazy to take her kid out. Some people just assume because their kid is young, that the world should to tolerate them. I am sure Op is not as psycho as my chain-smoking, whore of a neighbor... but obviously the kid did something to the neighbor for them to purchase an electric fence. It might have been to prevent any arguments or damage, but people don't usually spend tons of money to keep someone out unless that person is being an annoyance.
The real question is why is he in your neighbors lawn in the first place?
When I was young we lived in a neighborhood with houses really close together. We never had problems with keeping unwanted people off our property. This is just a lack of the parents parenting. Tell your child "no" and actually punish them when they don't listen, and you wouldn't have this problem.