By Anonymous - / Wednesday 18 November 2009 03:43 / United States
Add a comment
You must be logged in to be able to post comments!
Create my account Sign in
Top comments

You can use fishes as a plural, it's just not used often. 'fish n. , pl. , fish , or fishes . Any of numerous cold-blooded aquatic vertebrates of the superclass Pisces, characteristically having fins, gills'. It says it in the dictionary, and if that's not right, I don't know what is.


it's only fishs if your talking about different species of fish, 3 gold fish or 3 fishes depending if maybe one was a coi or something.


i know people will hate on me for this but i know you all thought the same so i'll say it: "wow, first black guy to know good grammar!"

hahahah made my day. might have been nice names, but sounded stupid when associated to fish ... i dont see any problem here

You do realise that the plural for fish is not fishes right, were you trying to be funny? the plural for fish is also just fish its the same as the plural form of sheep is still sheep


No, I wasn't just being funny. I know how language works, and it is in the oxford dictionary, it's just a very old way of saying the plural. It's just that language has changed, but it can be used, and is an acceptable way of pluralising fish.

Loading data…