By Anonymous - 18/11/2009 03:43 - United States

Today, me, a coworker, and my manager were looking at random advertisements. One ad was a picture of three fishes. My coworker named the three fishes what I thought were completely random names. I said "those are stupid names." Turns out those are my manager's kid's names. FML
I agree, your life sucks 9 587
You deserved it 32 324
Work
Previous FML Next FML

Add a comment

You must be logged in to be able to post comments!

Create my account Sign in

Top comments

crzyry 6

Ydi for being a dumbass. "Fish" is a singular and plural word.

68 4
Reply Report
akiranozaki 0
Send a private message

YDI for being judgmental.

50 4
Reply Report
Next

Comments

akiranozaki 0
Send a private message

YDI for being judgmental.

50 4
Reply Report
admad_fml 1
Send a private message

#1 Whats judgmental about stating a fact? lol FYL for not understanding basic words :D

2 1
Reply Report
mushoo_fml 0
Send a private message

OP could've covered it up by saying "I mean, for fish."

14 0
Reply Report
brutallyhonest24 0
Send a private message

i was gunna say that #25...

0 6
Reply Report
teebonehead 0

this guy works with a total butt kisser !

0 3
Reply Report
dannnn_fml 0
Send a private message

awww trout, bass and salmon are manly/pretty names! not judgmental..,,

2 3
Reply Report
newmxr 0

lol agreed wit 25

0 4
Reply Report
Sakke 4
Send a private message

That is why you shouldn't bash at random.

29 0
Reply Report
sesquipedalian44 0

looks like your going to be job hunting :)

12 1
Reply Report
viral_fml 0
Send a private message

Say they're strange names for fish. No FML here.

18 0
Reply Report
KarelessKitten 0
Send a private message

wtf?! and I've wanted to say this for awhile....FAIL! Lame FML.

0 0
Reply Report
wrigglezeus 0
Send a private message

sleepy, sneezy and bashful the fish?

4 0
Reply Report
crzyry 6

Ydi for being a dumbass. "Fish" is a singular and plural word.

68 4
Reply Report
Intellectualist 0

You can use fishes as a plural, it's just not used often. 'fish n. , pl. , fish , or fishes . Any of numerous cold-blooded aquatic vertebrates of the superclass Pisces, characteristically having fins, gills'. It says it in the dictionary, and if that's not right, I don't know what is.

0 0
Reply Report
Tossup 0
Send a private message

You're right, both are technically acceptable.

7 0
Reply Report
BeeSkwaird 0
Send a private message

Still, the OP's grammar is still awful! Look at the rest of the post!

5 0
Reply Report
Intellectualist 0

I never said it wasn't, but, fishes is acceptable. Depends on the context.

0 0
Reply Report
liveBabylon 0

it's only fishs if your talking about different species of fish, 3 gold fish or 3 fishes depending if maybe one was a coi or something.

1 11
Reply Report
every1luvspuns 0
Send a private message

i know people will hate on me for this but i know you all thought the same so i'll say it: "wow, first black guy to know good grammar!"

0 0
Reply Report
blindwhisper 0

hahahah made my day. might have been nice names, but sounded stupid when associated to fish ... i dont see any problem here

5 0
Reply Report
soccer_lover_714 4
Send a private message

The problem is his grammar...

5 0
Reply Report
whhy_fml 1

You do realise that the plural for fish is not fishes right, were you trying to be funny? the plural for fish is also just fish its the same as the plural form of sheep is still sheep

5 4
Reply Report
Intellectualist 0

No, I wasn't just being funny. I know how language works, and it is in the oxford dictionary, it's just a very old way of saying the plural. It's just that language has changed, but it can be used, and is an acceptable way of pluralising fish.

0 0
Reply Report
i_is_a_tr00l 0

"...For fish." Idiot.

0 0
Reply Report
Next