161
By some_girl_19 - / Wednesday 5 August 2009 13:04 / United States
Add a comment
You must be logged in to be able to post comments!
Create my account Sign in
Top comments
Comments
Reply
  CL41RE  |  6

Anyone else notice, in the submit your fml it says they try to get fresh stories, with tons of topics, but all the fmls posted these days are: Today, my boyfriend, or Today, my girlfriend, or today, I was having sex with...? Something along those lines.

Reply
  fmlfmlfml15  |  5

Too many negative votes, comment buried. Show the comment

Reply
  Plumppotato  |  5

he didnt know what the emergency was till he got there. so yes. it could have been a real emergency. for example, if someone broke into your house to rob and kill you. or if the house is on fire. or if someone was hurt, or dying. is sex more important than that? maybe....

By  someone2love  |  6

Too many negative votes, comment buried. Show the comment

Reply
  genius_man16  |  5

Agreed, that's pretty fucked up. I mean, I can sort of deal with people doing it when their parents are home (it's still idiotic) but little sister? You guys have issues.

Reply
  Moemoemoe_fml  |  5

Are you three out of your minds or just didn't grow up and find out about the adult world yet?? "Never do it with a kid in the house"?! What?? By your logic, no one with children could EVER have sex again. (So, all families would have only one kid too anyway, since there's no way to have sex and 'make more babies' after the first...hahaha.) You might want to know your parents had and are still having sex with you in the house, smartassses. The OP and her boyfriend weren't doing anything wrong, they were in the room, presumably behind a locked door, and were doing it discreetly enough that the kid didn't even know what they were doing. (Otherwise, it's doubtful whether she'd still have called them out to replace her batteries... Possible, but the likelihood she didn't know they were having sex is higher.)

Reply
  splitsides  |  5

#74, I agree to an extent. If it was just the three of them in the house and they were babysitting her, they should NOT have left her alone to have sex. That's just neglectful and selfish.

Reply
  Moemoemoe_fml  |  5

#75, while I agree with you if it had been the case, I don't think they were there for the sake of babysitting her, since the OP didn't imply anything to make us think that. I'd go as far as say kids old enough to play with a wii don't need constant supervision, but that might be because in my family we only let kids get into video games when not too young. Still, it didn't sound to me like they were skipping on babysitting stuff, they seemed to just be in the same house and that's it.

Reply
  elphie0709  |  5

It's different if parents are doing it while their kids are in bed. This sounds like he was babysitting his little sister, and they handed her a Wii remote, said "Knock yourself out.", and headed off to the bedroom. If he had to run and help her, obviously there was no one else in the house that could have. Sounds pretty irresponsible to me.

Reply
  MittenKitten  |  5

I'm pretty sure they meant it's disgusting because his LITTLE SISTER was downstairs, not children. When you have children and have sex (at appropriate times like when they are sleeping) then that's fine, not when your younger siblings are awake and seems like your supposed to be babysitting.

Loading data…