76
By AnxietyGirl / Monday 24 September 2012 07:18 / United States - Parker
Add a comment
You must be logged in to be able to post comments!
Create my account Sign in
Top comments
By  123man  |  33

Lots of people avoid eye contact. I hope there's more to it than that to make you say you need medication. You could have left off the first sentence and had a perfectly valid FML.

By  DocBastard  |  47

Too many negative votes, comment buried. Show the comment

Comments
By  123man  |  33

Lots of people avoid eye contact. I hope there's more to it than that to make you say you need medication. You could have left off the first sentence and had a perfectly valid FML.

Reply
  lacespace  |  33

I agree with you. ^ I dated a guy who was put on medication very young and he grew up with a lot of resentment towards doctors who jump directly to drugs as a quick fix.

Reply

Some people really do need meds. My parents actually ended up taking me to the hospital twice because of my anxiety. I'd start freaking out really bad. And usually I felt better at school but eventually it got so bad that I was super nervous at school too. I definitely needed meds at that point. The meds help a lot but I still have anxiety, although its definitely better than before. Its not a huge problem but I'm always worried that will happen to me. I try avoiding eye contact too sometimes and when I get anxiety I know I probably look a bit odd. But that only makes me more nervous, thinking about how I probably look suspicious.

Reply
  wooboo608  |  41

Sometimes medication isn't the best option. Side effects can cause new problems, plus no one wants to be dependent on a pill to function properly in society. In cases like this it might be worth looking into some counseling before going straight for the drugs option

Reply
  Doortje  |  41

Oh I definitely agree. It sounded to me like the option was already given to the OP (by a doctor or psychologist) and that she now had to admit it might be indeed a good idea. But if that's not the case it would definitely be better to talk to someone first.

Reply
  niallo  |  33

Unless they see you put something into your pocket, they have no right to assume anything. You now have a case against the store for false accusation.

By  perdix  |  37

Too many negative votes, comment buried. Show the comment

Reply

OCD is a mental disorder that falls under the anxiety umbrella. I know this because my little brother has severe OCD. He is on anti-anxiety medication because when his OCD thoughts and behavior act up, he will even tell you the first thing he feels is anxious and then that leads into other emotions like anger and frustration. Then he acts out in a way that anyone could tell its really anxiety.

Reply
  perdix  |  37

#37, Yeah, but who says where the cop's gloves have been? Are they fancy-pants cops who open a new, sterile pair of gloves each time, or normal ones who pat you down with the same mitts they recently used to perform a cavity search on a hobo? Now, I'm starting to get anxious.

Reply

Um.. If any cop kept a glove that they used to do a cavity search on a hobo... I'd be more worried about the police then germs... Germs you can wash off and get rid of.. Fucked up police are harder to take care of...

By  DocBastard  |  47

Too many negative votes, comment buried. Show the comment

Reply
  Dilwann  |  14

What kind of advice is that? The management did nothing wrong, it's those persons' job to pat people down. If anyone would sue, you don't even have a case. Please, think logically.

Reply
  TahoeFMler  |  14

I agree. You can't be patted down legally (even by the police) unless they saw you put something in a pocket or have you on camera. Looking sketchy isn't enough.

Reply
  Fishinaddict22  |  14

19- In your logic you could be cavity searched because you look suspicious. The law suit is on the grounds of harassment. Because of situations like this companies are instructed to let the person leave and check the security tapes. Said person technically has not shoplifted until they leave the store. At that point they are off store property and running them down would be grounds for assault. Not saying this is right by any means but sadly it's how things work these days.

Loading data…