By -bird-poop- - / Saturday 10 October 2009 12:52 / Germany
You could also like
Add a comment
You must be logged in to be able to post comments!
Create my account Sign in
Top comments
  Sun_Kissed18  |  25

It might not be too early for them. Who knows how old they are? If they are older and know what they want then there is no problem with that. Also, they could have been friends before they started dating so they might have known each other for longer than 7 months.

  americayay  |  0

Yes, different people deal with things differently. Just because they might be older, though, doesn't mean marriage is any more acceptable after 7 months than if they were 18. It's about knowing eachother and knowing what you're getting into.

And 46, just because your girlfriend was a whore and YOU didn't know what you'd be getting into, doesn't mean other people can't have an good idea at the same age.

  Puolukka  |  4

Yea, but getting engaged after 7 months≠getting married after 7 months. My husband proposed to me after 3 months of dating and I said yes, but we didn't get married until 2.5 years later. And now we've been married for 2 years so...yea...some people do know that early on in a relationship.

  farhil  |  14

My parents were married within 4 months of meeting eachother and have an extremely healthy relationship. But they were mature enough to handle it, unlike most idiots these days.

  Morokea  |  0

"Shat" is an acceptable past tense form of "shit." Although I don't think there's any sort of formal rule for this...

And yes, that sucks. It's a sign to wait more than 7 months!

  GalaxyShots  |  21

1.) 'Shitted' isn't a word whatsoever.
2.) 'Shat' is, in fact, the past tense of shit.
3.) Stop being a grammar Nazi. You have no clue what you're talking about.