172
Add a comment
You must be logged in to be able to post comments!
Create my account Sign in
Top comments
Comments
Reply
  R34luver  |  5

its actually safer to drive through because it less likely to lose control of the vehical...if you slam on the brakes its a hell of a lot more dangrous

Reply

It says a dead animal. It could have been a deer, bear, large wild cat, moose, coyote, etc. I recently swerved to avoid a very large deer because I didn't want my car or person to get pwnt.

Reply
  Daralea  |  21

No, but OP deserves it for not looking at where he was swerving. "I know I ran over that child officer, but if I hit that deer the damage to my car would have been significantly more expensive to fix.

By  lylasgurgur  |  12

Too many negative votes, comment buried. Show the comment

Reply
  LilaBear  |  1

#14 - while it's a fair enough assumption that the OP did kill the animal that was alive, he doesn't actually say that. So the question is valid.

Reply
  marpay  |  11

Op could of hit a large animal and totaled their car, possibly ended up in the hospital. That would be worse than hitting a small animal.

By  NoNotTheFace  |  8

Tell the truth, you just didn't want your rims all messed up by dead animal guts so you swerved. Now somewhere, a creepy taxidermist's senses are tingling... He's on his way. Thanks to you.

Loading data…