43
By Anonymous / Saturday 22 August 2015 00:29 / United States - Bonita Springs
Add a comment
You must be logged in to be able to post comments!
Create my account Sign in
Top comments
Comments
Reply
  rileyrae0000  |  23

I was thinking the same thing. I'm sure both of you don't want to be stuck in the same position and not get promoted. So if it wasn't you, it would be your sister which would be unfortunate as well.

By  whassallt26  |  13

I would think It all depends on the job really, if there was a lot of pressure on the manager to get staff to meet targets, then I would rather work somewhere else than resent my sibling while working

Reply
  KK3137  |  31

It's probably an effort to prevent nepotism within the store, i.e. you're the manager and you hire and give benefits to your sibling because you're related, OR it's so that there are no problems with one sibling being higher up and maybe giving orders to the other sibling.

Reply
  Murilirum  |  23

Exactly this. It's a policy that's got well-rooted intentions but it seems like more of a pain in my ass than anything when I promote someone of a department then find out one of their relatives is now reporting to them. It makes enforcing professionalism marginally harder for relatives with a closer connection but letting someone go is just unacceptable.

Reply
  elusiveshame  |  22

We have the same policy at work, and it's a government entity. Generally it's okay if a family member is in another department and not a direct report, but these policies exist to prevent major headaches and lawsuits. Sucks you lost your job, op, but if it's in the policies, you should've been aware of that and been prepared for the worst.

Loading data…