112
By UptoHERE - / Thursday 4 February 2010 03:18 / Canada
Add a comment
You must be logged in to be able to post comments!
Create my account Sign in
Top comments
By  null_fml  |  27

So the door to a gas station washroom was watertight, eh? And it opened out, rather than opening in? And the water in the bathroom was much much higher than your knees, since you were outside the bathroom upon opening it? And no employees nor visitors had opened that door for however many hours it would have taken for that much water to build up? And you opened the door wide enough to actually be hit with the majority of the water flow, fast enough that you didn't notice the problem in time? Okay, I believe you. Just checking.

Comments
Reply
  wordgirl  |  6

metalfan: Because no one had discovered it until the OP opened the door, duuuuuuh. I think it took you exactly zero seconds to think before you typed. :D

Reply
  masquerade08  |  6

Yep, I agree. Ditch the pants. Even if you don't have spares. I'd do it. Even though I know any guys on the trip would be staring. Unless you're going comando. Then take a pair of sissors and cut em-off. Better than smelling like shit the entire car ride.

By  Sabre300  |  5

third and that sucks. I once accidently kicked over a canister full of moldy water and soaked my pants. the kicker was I was 3 hrs from home and a fresh pair of pants

Reply
  null_fml  |  5

#6: Interpreting the sentence, "I was 3 hrs from home and a fresh pair of pants"... You're assuming: "I was [3 hrs from home] and [a fresh pair of pants]" Failing to assume "I was 3 hrs from [home and a fresh pair of pants]" was your own elementary-school-level fault, not the fault of the commenter you were criticizing.

Reply
  babybubz  |  5

you fail at being funny.. but win at being obnoxious. you don't need to ruin EVERY single FML with your stupid comments on other people's errors.. they're just little stories for entertainment ..not a fucking English exam.

Reply
  null_fml  |  5

#45: So you're saying you recognized #4's intent and chose to ignore it in order to be a jackass for no good reason, then implying that I didn't do exactly the same? Heh.. I think you're a little lacking in the logic department.

Reply

Cmon, Snickerdoodles [were] just having some fun... Don't make a grammar exercise out of FML, retard. If you're that good at linguistics, go to one of those super nerdy seminars in your average community college and keep that kinda shit to yourself instead of shitting on people here. Oh and by the way, you talk like an arrogant douche. Not cool.

Reply
  null_fml  |  5

#52: You seem to be under the impression that sarcasm exempts you from the responsibility of a dumb decision. Of course you recognized what #4 MEANT, but the problem is that the comment you think was a "joke" (#6) just doesn't work when the grammar you're trying to make fun of had nothing wrong with it. To put it in other words, you were calling #4 out for ambiguity, but ambiguity in that type of phrase is normal and prevalent (because anyone with a brain can choose the correct interpretation based on context). That leaves your comment as unfunny, unprovoked, and just plain rude.

Reply
  rexmaxus  |  36

If you ate serious: I hate you. if you are kidding: I still hate you. That "joke" validates the actions of others to "sue for damages". Yeah, sometimes it's valid, but most of the time it's just money grabbing.

By  thrice324  |  12

Go back there, go to the washroom again and (if you don't get splashed with shit water again) excrete your body waste all over their floor and walls. And leave the water running.

Loading data…